Cargando…

Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment

BACKGROUND: Bone loss after stroke escalates the risk of fractures, mainly in the hip, leading to further disability in individuals with stroke. We aimed to investigate the skeletal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) based on the duration of onset of stroke, compare the BMD of the paretic and non-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hoo Young, Park, Jung Hyun, Lee, Hyanglim, Kim, Tae-Woo, Yoo, Seung Don
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317227
http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2020.27.4.237
_version_ 1783624806674989056
author Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Lee, Hyanglim
Kim, Tae-Woo
Yoo, Seung Don
author_facet Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Lee, Hyanglim
Kim, Tae-Woo
Yoo, Seung Don
author_sort Lee, Hoo Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone loss after stroke escalates the risk of fractures, mainly in the hip, leading to further disability in individuals with stroke. We aimed to investigate the skeletal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) based on the duration of onset of stroke, compare the BMD of the paretic and non-paretic sides, and elucidate the relationship between BMD and disability variables. METHODS: The 31 male hemiplegic stroke patients between 20 and 70 years of age with cerebral infarction or hemorrhage were considered in this study. Subacute and chronic cases included 13 and 18 patients with lag time from the onset of 1 to 6 months and beyond 6 months, respectively. BMD in the lumbar, paretic, and non-paretic hip as well as the disability variables were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The subacute group showed a significant reduction in the femoral neck BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.013). Bone loss was significantly correlated with lower limb muscle strength and overall physical impairment (P<0.05). The chronic group demonstrated significant reduction in femur neck and total femur BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). T-scores of BMD in the chronic phase were not significantly associated with the clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Early screening of bilateral hip BMD in the early stages after stroke, monitoring, and timely implementation of prevention strategies are important to minimize subsequent bone loss and prevent possible complications in patients who experience stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77464772020-12-31 Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment Lee, Hoo Young Park, Jung Hyun Lee, Hyanglim Kim, Tae-Woo Yoo, Seung Don J Bone Metab Original Article BACKGROUND: Bone loss after stroke escalates the risk of fractures, mainly in the hip, leading to further disability in individuals with stroke. We aimed to investigate the skeletal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) based on the duration of onset of stroke, compare the BMD of the paretic and non-paretic sides, and elucidate the relationship between BMD and disability variables. METHODS: The 31 male hemiplegic stroke patients between 20 and 70 years of age with cerebral infarction or hemorrhage were considered in this study. Subacute and chronic cases included 13 and 18 patients with lag time from the onset of 1 to 6 months and beyond 6 months, respectively. BMD in the lumbar, paretic, and non-paretic hip as well as the disability variables were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The subacute group showed a significant reduction in the femoral neck BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.013). Bone loss was significantly correlated with lower limb muscle strength and overall physical impairment (P<0.05). The chronic group demonstrated significant reduction in femur neck and total femur BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). T-scores of BMD in the chronic phase were not significantly associated with the clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Early screening of bilateral hip BMD in the early stages after stroke, monitoring, and timely implementation of prevention strategies are important to minimize subsequent bone loss and prevent possible complications in patients who experience stroke. The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2020-11 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7746477/ /pubmed/33317227 http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2020.27.4.237 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hoo Young
Park, Jung Hyun
Lee, Hyanglim
Kim, Tae-Woo
Yoo, Seung Don
Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title_full Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title_fullStr Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title_full_unstemmed Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title_short Does Hip Bone Density Differ between Paretic and Non-Paretic Sides in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients? and Its Relationship with Physical Impairment
title_sort does hip bone density differ between paretic and non-paretic sides in hemiplegic stroke patients? and its relationship with physical impairment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317227
http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2020.27.4.237
work_keys_str_mv AT leehooyoung doeshipbonedensitydifferbetweenpareticandnonpareticsidesinhemiplegicstrokepatientsanditsrelationshipwithphysicalimpairment
AT parkjunghyun doeshipbonedensitydifferbetweenpareticandnonpareticsidesinhemiplegicstrokepatientsanditsrelationshipwithphysicalimpairment
AT leehyanglim doeshipbonedensitydifferbetweenpareticandnonpareticsidesinhemiplegicstrokepatientsanditsrelationshipwithphysicalimpairment
AT kimtaewoo doeshipbonedensitydifferbetweenpareticandnonpareticsidesinhemiplegicstrokepatientsanditsrelationshipwithphysicalimpairment
AT yooseungdon doeshipbonedensitydifferbetweenpareticandnonpareticsidesinhemiplegicstrokepatientsanditsrelationshipwithphysicalimpairment