Cargando…

Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale

BACKGROUND: Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) is an advanced cannulation method for accessing common bile duct (CBD) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). If CBD cannulation is difficult, an endoscopist can open the septum between the pancreatic and biliary duct with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskensalo, Vilja, Udd, Marianne, Rainio, Mia, Halttunen, Jorma, Sipilä, Matias, Lindström, Outi, Kylänpää, Leena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07364-y
_version_ 1783624823841226752
author Koskensalo, Vilja
Udd, Marianne
Rainio, Mia
Halttunen, Jorma
Sipilä, Matias
Lindström, Outi
Kylänpää, Leena
author_facet Koskensalo, Vilja
Udd, Marianne
Rainio, Mia
Halttunen, Jorma
Sipilä, Matias
Lindström, Outi
Kylänpää, Leena
author_sort Koskensalo, Vilja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) is an advanced cannulation method for accessing common bile duct (CBD) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). If CBD cannulation is difficult, an endoscopist can open the septum between the pancreatic and biliary duct with a sphincterotome to gain access. Long-term results of this procedure are unclear. We wanted to evaluate the short- and long-term complications of TPBS on patients with native papilla and benign indication for ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ERCPs performed in Helsinki University Hospital between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. The study group comprised 143 consecutive patients with TPBS and 140 controls (CG). Data were collected from patient records and a phone survey was performed as a follow-up ≥ 4 years after the index ERCP. RESULTS: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) developed in seven patients (4.9%) in TPBS and one patient (0.7%) in CG (p = 0.067). The rates of other acute complications were similar between the groups. ERCP ended with no access to CBD in four cases (2.8%) in TPBS. The median length of follow-up was 6 years in TPBS and 7 years in CG. During this period, three patients (2.1%) in TPBS and six patients (4.3%) in CG suffered from acute pancreatitis (AP) (p = 0.238). One (0.7%) patient in CG and none in TPBS developed chronic pancreatitis (CP). Abdominal pain was suffered by ten patients (6.9%) in TPBS and twelve patients (8.6%) in CG daily, whereas by six patients (4.2%) in TPBS and twelve patients (8.6%) in CG weekly. CONCLUSION: TPBS is a useful procedure, with acceptable complication rates. No significant difference occurred between the groups when evaluating the short-term or long-term complications with a follow-up period of four to 10 years. Additionally, no significant differences occurred in upper abdominal pain, episodes of AP, or development of CP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77465582020-12-21 Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale Koskensalo, Vilja Udd, Marianne Rainio, Mia Halttunen, Jorma Sipilä, Matias Lindström, Outi Kylänpää, Leena Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy (TPBS) is an advanced cannulation method for accessing common bile duct (CBD) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). If CBD cannulation is difficult, an endoscopist can open the septum between the pancreatic and biliary duct with a sphincterotome to gain access. Long-term results of this procedure are unclear. We wanted to evaluate the short- and long-term complications of TPBS on patients with native papilla and benign indication for ERCP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ERCPs performed in Helsinki University Hospital between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. The study group comprised 143 consecutive patients with TPBS and 140 controls (CG). Data were collected from patient records and a phone survey was performed as a follow-up ≥ 4 years after the index ERCP. RESULTS: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) developed in seven patients (4.9%) in TPBS and one patient (0.7%) in CG (p = 0.067). The rates of other acute complications were similar between the groups. ERCP ended with no access to CBD in four cases (2.8%) in TPBS. The median length of follow-up was 6 years in TPBS and 7 years in CG. During this period, three patients (2.1%) in TPBS and six patients (4.3%) in CG suffered from acute pancreatitis (AP) (p = 0.238). One (0.7%) patient in CG and none in TPBS developed chronic pancreatitis (CP). Abdominal pain was suffered by ten patients (6.9%) in TPBS and twelve patients (8.6%) in CG daily, whereas by six patients (4.2%) in TPBS and twelve patients (8.6%) in CG weekly. CONCLUSION: TPBS is a useful procedure, with acceptable complication rates. No significant difference occurred between the groups when evaluating the short-term or long-term complications with a follow-up period of four to 10 years. Additionally, no significant differences occurred in upper abdominal pain, episodes of AP, or development of CP. Springer US 2020-01-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7746558/ /pubmed/31993817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07364-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Koskensalo, Vilja
Udd, Marianne
Rainio, Mia
Halttunen, Jorma
Sipilä, Matias
Lindström, Outi
Kylänpää, Leena
Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title_full Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title_fullStr Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title_full_unstemmed Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title_short Transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
title_sort transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy for biliary access is safe also on a long-term scale
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07364-y
work_keys_str_mv AT koskensalovilja transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT uddmarianne transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT rainiomia transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT halttunenjorma transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT sipilamatias transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT lindstromouti transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale
AT kylanpaaleena transpancreaticbiliarysphincterotomyforbiliaryaccessissafealsoonalongtermscale