Cargando…

Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that foveal cone topography is symmetrical between contralateral eyes. METHODS: We used adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy to acquire images of the foveal cone mosaic in each eye of 58 subjects with normal vision (35 female, 23 male). Cones were semiautomat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cava, Jenna A., Allphin, Mitchell T., Mastey, Rebecca R., Gaffney, Mina, Linderman, Rachel E., Cooper, Robert F., Carroll, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33331861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.14.23
_version_ 1783624897583382528
author Cava, Jenna A.
Allphin, Mitchell T.
Mastey, Rebecca R.
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
author_facet Cava, Jenna A.
Allphin, Mitchell T.
Mastey, Rebecca R.
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
author_sort Cava, Jenna A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that foveal cone topography is symmetrical between contralateral eyes. METHODS: We used adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy to acquire images of the foveal cone mosaic in each eye of 58 subjects with normal vision (35 female, 23 male). Cones were semiautomatically identified over a 300 × 300-µm foveal area. From these cone coordinates, maps of cone density were derived, and we extracted estimates of peak cone density from each map. Mosaic regularity was assessed using Voronoi cell area regularity (VCAR). Average roundness and average area of the 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, and 90% of peak density isodensity contours were evaluated. RESULTS: The average peak cone density for right eyes was 180,286 cones/mm(2) (n = 49) and for left eyes was 182,397 cones/mm(2) (n = 45), with a mean absolute difference of 6363 cones/mm(2) (n = 43). Peak density, cone spacing, VCAR, and average area within the isodensity contours of fellow eyes were not significantly different (P = 0.60, P = 0.83, P = 0.30, and P = 0.39, respectively). However, the average roundness of the isodensity contours was 2% more circular in the right eyes than in the left eyes (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There is interocular symmetry of peak foveal cone density, mosaic regularity, and area encompassing the most densely packed cells in subjects with normal vision. The origin and significance of the observed interocular difference in average roundness of the isodensity contours are unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77469602020-12-23 Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic Cava, Jenna A. Allphin, Mitchell T. Mastey, Rebecca R. Gaffney, Mina Linderman, Rachel E. Cooper, Robert F. Carroll, Joseph Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Retina PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that foveal cone topography is symmetrical between contralateral eyes. METHODS: We used adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy to acquire images of the foveal cone mosaic in each eye of 58 subjects with normal vision (35 female, 23 male). Cones were semiautomatically identified over a 300 × 300-µm foveal area. From these cone coordinates, maps of cone density were derived, and we extracted estimates of peak cone density from each map. Mosaic regularity was assessed using Voronoi cell area regularity (VCAR). Average roundness and average area of the 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, and 90% of peak density isodensity contours were evaluated. RESULTS: The average peak cone density for right eyes was 180,286 cones/mm(2) (n = 49) and for left eyes was 182,397 cones/mm(2) (n = 45), with a mean absolute difference of 6363 cones/mm(2) (n = 43). Peak density, cone spacing, VCAR, and average area within the isodensity contours of fellow eyes were not significantly different (P = 0.60, P = 0.83, P = 0.30, and P = 0.39, respectively). However, the average roundness of the isodensity contours was 2% more circular in the right eyes than in the left eyes (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There is interocular symmetry of peak foveal cone density, mosaic regularity, and area encompassing the most densely packed cells in subjects with normal vision. The origin and significance of the observed interocular difference in average roundness of the isodensity contours are unclear. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7746960/ /pubmed/33331861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.14.23 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Retina
Cava, Jenna A.
Allphin, Mitchell T.
Mastey, Rebecca R.
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title_full Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title_fullStr Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title_short Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic
title_sort assessing interocular symmetry of the foveal cone mosaic
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33331861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.14.23
work_keys_str_mv AT cavajennaa assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT allphinmitchellt assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT masteyrebeccar assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT gaffneymina assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT lindermanrachele assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT cooperrobertf assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic
AT carrolljoseph assessinginterocularsymmetryofthefovealconemosaic