Cargando…
Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453 |
_version_ | 1783624899677388800 |
---|---|
author | Cuatrecasas, Guillem de Cabo, Francisco Coves, Maria Josep Patrascioiu, Ioana Aguilar, Gerardo March, Sonia Balfegó, Mariona Bretxa, Clara Calbo, Marta Cuatrecasas, Gabriel Aranda, Gloria Orois, Aida Bové, Isabel Munoz‐Marron, Elena García‐Lorda, Pilar |
author_facet | Cuatrecasas, Guillem de Cabo, Francisco Coves, Maria Josep Patrascioiu, Ioana Aguilar, Gerardo March, Sonia Balfegó, Mariona Bretxa, Clara Calbo, Marta Cuatrecasas, Gabriel Aranda, Gloria Orois, Aida Bové, Isabel Munoz‐Marron, Elena García‐Lorda, Pilar |
author_sort | Cuatrecasas, Guillem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and profound subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental and perirenal (retroperitoneal) fat and correlate them with MS markers. METHODS: Sequential US measures of these five abdominal fat layers were done at 397 adults. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist, body fat %, HOMA‐IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), lipid profile and leptin were recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was defined according to Cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel III (ATPIII) criteria. RESULTS: Subcutaneous and omental fat were increased among people with obesity, whereas preperitoneal and perirenal fat did not show any difference according to BMI or waist. Women showed thicker subcutaneous fat (both superficial and profound), whereas men had bigger omental fat. Both postmenopausal and diabetic patients had changes in omental fat only, whereas patients with fatty liver showed thicker preperitoneal and perirenal fat, as well. MS patients showed both thicker perirenal and omental fat. A cut‐off of 54 mm in male (M)/34 mm in female (F) of omental fat and 22.5 mm (M)/12.5 mm (F) of perirenal fat could be predictive of later MS onset. CONCLUSIONS: US is a valid method to measure all different abdominal fat depots. Omental and perirenal fat measures may classify patients at risk for MS. Preperitoneal fat depot may also correlate with fatty liver disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7746969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77469692020-12-21 Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity Cuatrecasas, Guillem de Cabo, Francisco Coves, Maria Josep Patrascioiu, Ioana Aguilar, Gerardo March, Sonia Balfegó, Mariona Bretxa, Clara Calbo, Marta Cuatrecasas, Gabriel Aranda, Gloria Orois, Aida Bové, Isabel Munoz‐Marron, Elena García‐Lorda, Pilar Obes Sci Pract Original Article OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and profound subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental and perirenal (retroperitoneal) fat and correlate them with MS markers. METHODS: Sequential US measures of these five abdominal fat layers were done at 397 adults. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist, body fat %, HOMA‐IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), lipid profile and leptin were recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was defined according to Cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel III (ATPIII) criteria. RESULTS: Subcutaneous and omental fat were increased among people with obesity, whereas preperitoneal and perirenal fat did not show any difference according to BMI or waist. Women showed thicker subcutaneous fat (both superficial and profound), whereas men had bigger omental fat. Both postmenopausal and diabetic patients had changes in omental fat only, whereas patients with fatty liver showed thicker preperitoneal and perirenal fat, as well. MS patients showed both thicker perirenal and omental fat. A cut‐off of 54 mm in male (M)/34 mm in female (F) of omental fat and 22.5 mm (M)/12.5 mm (F) of perirenal fat could be predictive of later MS onset. CONCLUSIONS: US is a valid method to measure all different abdominal fat depots. Omental and perirenal fat measures may classify patients at risk for MS. Preperitoneal fat depot may also correlate with fatty liver disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7746969/ /pubmed/33354344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cuatrecasas, Guillem de Cabo, Francisco Coves, Maria Josep Patrascioiu, Ioana Aguilar, Gerardo March, Sonia Balfegó, Mariona Bretxa, Clara Calbo, Marta Cuatrecasas, Gabriel Aranda, Gloria Orois, Aida Bové, Isabel Munoz‐Marron, Elena García‐Lorda, Pilar Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title | Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title_full | Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title_short | Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
title_sort | ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuatrecasasguillem ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT decabofrancisco ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT covesmariajosep ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT patrascioiuioana ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT aguilargerardo ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT marchsonia ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT balfegomariona ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT bretxaclara ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT calbomarta ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT cuatrecasasgabriel ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT arandagloria ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT oroisaida ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT boveisabel ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT munozmarronelena ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity AT garcialordapilar ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity |