Cargando…

Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuatrecasas, Guillem, de Cabo, Francisco, Coves, Maria Josep, Patrascioiu, Ioana, Aguilar, Gerardo, March, Sonia, Balfegó, Mariona, Bretxa, Clara, Calbo, Marta, Cuatrecasas, Gabriel, Aranda, Gloria, Orois, Aida, Bové, Isabel, Munoz‐Marron, Elena, García‐Lorda, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453
_version_ 1783624899677388800
author Cuatrecasas, Guillem
de Cabo, Francisco
Coves, Maria Josep
Patrascioiu, Ioana
Aguilar, Gerardo
March, Sonia
Balfegó, Mariona
Bretxa, Clara
Calbo, Marta
Cuatrecasas, Gabriel
Aranda, Gloria
Orois, Aida
Bové, Isabel
Munoz‐Marron, Elena
García‐Lorda, Pilar
author_facet Cuatrecasas, Guillem
de Cabo, Francisco
Coves, Maria Josep
Patrascioiu, Ioana
Aguilar, Gerardo
March, Sonia
Balfegó, Mariona
Bretxa, Clara
Calbo, Marta
Cuatrecasas, Gabriel
Aranda, Gloria
Orois, Aida
Bové, Isabel
Munoz‐Marron, Elena
García‐Lorda, Pilar
author_sort Cuatrecasas, Guillem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and profound subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental and perirenal (retroperitoneal) fat and correlate them with MS markers. METHODS: Sequential US measures of these five abdominal fat layers were done at 397 adults. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist, body fat %, HOMA‐IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), lipid profile and leptin were recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was defined according to Cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel III (ATPIII) criteria. RESULTS: Subcutaneous and omental fat were increased among people with obesity, whereas preperitoneal and perirenal fat did not show any difference according to BMI or waist. Women showed thicker subcutaneous fat (both superficial and profound), whereas men had bigger omental fat. Both postmenopausal and diabetic patients had changes in omental fat only, whereas patients with fatty liver showed thicker preperitoneal and perirenal fat, as well. MS patients showed both thicker perirenal and omental fat. A cut‐off of 54 mm in male (M)/34 mm in female (F) of omental fat and 22.5 mm (M)/12.5 mm (F) of perirenal fat could be predictive of later MS onset. CONCLUSIONS: US is a valid method to measure all different abdominal fat depots. Omental and perirenal fat measures may classify patients at risk for MS. Preperitoneal fat depot may also correlate with fatty liver disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7746969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77469692020-12-21 Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity Cuatrecasas, Guillem de Cabo, Francisco Coves, Maria Josep Patrascioiu, Ioana Aguilar, Gerardo March, Sonia Balfegó, Mariona Bretxa, Clara Calbo, Marta Cuatrecasas, Gabriel Aranda, Gloria Orois, Aida Bové, Isabel Munoz‐Marron, Elena García‐Lorda, Pilar Obes Sci Pract Original Article OBJECTIVE: Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and profound subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental and perirenal (retroperitoneal) fat and correlate them with MS markers. METHODS: Sequential US measures of these five abdominal fat layers were done at 397 adults. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist, body fat %, HOMA‐IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), lipid profile and leptin were recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was defined according to Cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel III (ATPIII) criteria. RESULTS: Subcutaneous and omental fat were increased among people with obesity, whereas preperitoneal and perirenal fat did not show any difference according to BMI or waist. Women showed thicker subcutaneous fat (both superficial and profound), whereas men had bigger omental fat. Both postmenopausal and diabetic patients had changes in omental fat only, whereas patients with fatty liver showed thicker preperitoneal and perirenal fat, as well. MS patients showed both thicker perirenal and omental fat. A cut‐off of 54 mm in male (M)/34 mm in female (F) of omental fat and 22.5 mm (M)/12.5 mm (F) of perirenal fat could be predictive of later MS onset. CONCLUSIONS: US is a valid method to measure all different abdominal fat depots. Omental and perirenal fat measures may classify patients at risk for MS. Preperitoneal fat depot may also correlate with fatty liver disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7746969/ /pubmed/33354344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cuatrecasas, Guillem
de Cabo, Francisco
Coves, Maria Josep
Patrascioiu, Ioana
Aguilar, Gerardo
March, Sonia
Balfegó, Mariona
Bretxa, Clara
Calbo, Marta
Cuatrecasas, Gabriel
Aranda, Gloria
Orois, Aida
Bové, Isabel
Munoz‐Marron, Elena
García‐Lorda, Pilar
Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title_full Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title_fullStr Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title_short Ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
title_sort ultrasound measures of abdominal fat layers correlate with metabolic syndrome features in patients with obesity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.453
work_keys_str_mv AT cuatrecasasguillem ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT decabofrancisco ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT covesmariajosep ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT patrascioiuioana ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT aguilargerardo ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT marchsonia ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT balfegomariona ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT bretxaclara ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT calbomarta ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT cuatrecasasgabriel ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT arandagloria ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT oroisaida ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT boveisabel ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT munozmarronelena ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity
AT garcialordapilar ultrasoundmeasuresofabdominalfatlayerscorrelatewithmetabolicsyndromefeaturesinpatientswithobesity