Cargando…
Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941 |
_version_ | 1783624926514642944 |
---|---|
author | Johnsrud, Kjersti Seierstad, Therese Russell, David Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth |
author_facet | Johnsrud, Kjersti Seierstad, Therese Russell, David Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth |
author_sort | Johnsrud, Kjersti |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique to quantify plaque inflammation, but a consensus on the methodology has not been established. High inter-reader agreement is essential if (18)F-FDG PET/CT is to be used as a clinical tool for the assessment of unstable plaques and stroke risk. METHODS: We assessed the inter-reader variability of different methods for quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake in 43 patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥70%. Two independent readers delineated the plaque and collected maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) from all axial PET slices containing the atherosclerotic plaque. RESULTS: Uptake values with and without background correction were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients were highest for uncorrected uptake values (0.97–0.98) followed by those background corrected by subtraction (0.89–0.94) and lowest for those background corrected by division (0.74–0.79). CONCLUSION: Quantification methods without background correction have the highest inter-reader agreement for (18)F-FDG PET of carotid artery plaque inflammation. The use of the single highest uptake value (max SUV(max)) from the plaque will facilitate the method’s clinical utility in stroke prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7747113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77471132021-01-04 Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation Johnsrud, Kjersti Seierstad, Therese Russell, David Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Original Article INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique to quantify plaque inflammation, but a consensus on the methodology has not been established. High inter-reader agreement is essential if (18)F-FDG PET/CT is to be used as a clinical tool for the assessment of unstable plaques and stroke risk. METHODS: We assessed the inter-reader variability of different methods for quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake in 43 patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥70%. Two independent readers delineated the plaque and collected maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) from all axial PET slices containing the atherosclerotic plaque. RESULTS: Uptake values with and without background correction were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients were highest for uncorrected uptake values (0.97–0.98) followed by those background corrected by subtraction (0.89–0.94) and lowest for those background corrected by division (0.74–0.79). CONCLUSION: Quantification methods without background correction have the highest inter-reader agreement for (18)F-FDG PET of carotid artery plaque inflammation. The use of the single highest uptake value (max SUV(max)) from the plaque will facilitate the method’s clinical utility in stroke prevention. SAGE Publications 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7747113/ /pubmed/33403110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Johnsrud, Kjersti Seierstad, Therese Russell, David Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title | Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title_full | Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title_fullStr | Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title_short | Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
title_sort | inter-reader agreement of (18)f-fdg pet/ct for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsrudkjersti interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation AT seierstadtherese interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation AT russelldavid interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation AT revheimmonaelisabeth interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation |