Cargando…

Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation

INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnsrud, Kjersti, Seierstad, Therese, Russell, David, Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941
_version_ 1783624926514642944
author Johnsrud, Kjersti
Seierstad, Therese
Russell, David
Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
author_facet Johnsrud, Kjersti
Seierstad, Therese
Russell, David
Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
author_sort Johnsrud, Kjersti
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique to quantify plaque inflammation, but a consensus on the methodology has not been established. High inter-reader agreement is essential if (18)F-FDG PET/CT is to be used as a clinical tool for the assessment of unstable plaques and stroke risk. METHODS: We assessed the inter-reader variability of different methods for quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake in 43 patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥70%. Two independent readers delineated the plaque and collected maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) from all axial PET slices containing the atherosclerotic plaque. RESULTS: Uptake values with and without background correction were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients were highest for uncorrected uptake values (0.97–0.98) followed by those background corrected by subtraction (0.89–0.94) and lowest for those background corrected by division (0.74–0.79). CONCLUSION: Quantification methods without background correction have the highest inter-reader agreement for (18)F-FDG PET of carotid artery plaque inflammation. The use of the single highest uptake value (max SUV(max)) from the plaque will facilitate the method’s clinical utility in stroke prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7747113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77471132021-01-04 Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation Johnsrud, Kjersti Seierstad, Therese Russell, David Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Original Article INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Inflammation is a key feature of plaque instability. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)-fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is a promising technique to quantify plaque inflammation, but a consensus on the methodology has not been established. High inter-reader agreement is essential if (18)F-FDG PET/CT is to be used as a clinical tool for the assessment of unstable plaques and stroke risk. METHODS: We assessed the inter-reader variability of different methods for quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake in 43 patients with carotid artery stenosis ≥70%. Two independent readers delineated the plaque and collected maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) from all axial PET slices containing the atherosclerotic plaque. RESULTS: Uptake values with and without background correction were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients were highest for uncorrected uptake values (0.97–0.98) followed by those background corrected by subtraction (0.89–0.94) and lowest for those background corrected by division (0.74–0.79). CONCLUSION: Quantification methods without background correction have the highest inter-reader agreement for (18)F-FDG PET of carotid artery plaque inflammation. The use of the single highest uptake value (max SUV(max)) from the plaque will facilitate the method’s clinical utility in stroke prevention. SAGE Publications 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7747113/ /pubmed/33403110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Johnsrud, Kjersti
Seierstad, Therese
Russell, David
Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title_full Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title_fullStr Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title_full_unstemmed Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title_short Inter-reader agreement of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
title_sort inter-reader agreement of (18)f-fdg pet/ct for the quantification of carotid artery plaque inflammation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020980941
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsrudkjersti interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation
AT seierstadtherese interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation
AT russelldavid interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation
AT revheimmonaelisabeth interreaderagreementof18ffdgpetctforthequantificationofcarotidarteryplaqueinflammation