Cargando…

Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, the results of ASCR are still limited, and little information about retear after ASCR or subsequent treatment h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seung-Jun, Kang, Suk-Woong, Chung, Ilkwon, Jang, Hyungseo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966410
_version_ 1783624929338458112
author Lee, Seung-Jun
Kang, Suk-Woong
Chung, Ilkwon
Jang, Hyungseo
author_facet Lee, Seung-Jun
Kang, Suk-Woong
Chung, Ilkwon
Jang, Hyungseo
author_sort Lee, Seung-Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, the results of ASCR are still limited, and little information about retear after ASCR or subsequent treatment has been reported. PURPOSE: To investigate the retear rate of patients who underwent ASCR and to analyze the clinical outcomes of treatments performed for a retear. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 42 patients (46 shoulders) who underwent ASCR between March 2015 and April 2018. All patients were divided into 2 groups: those with no retear (30 shoulders) and those with retear (16 shoulders). Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiological results were compared between the 2 groups. The retear pattern and treatment outcomes of the retear group were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall incidence of retear was 35% (16/46). No difference was found in preoperative demographic or clinical data between the 2 groups. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging data showed a significant between-group difference in the preoperative Goutallier grade of the subscapularis (1.5 ± 1.1 in the no-retear group vs 2.5 ± 1.3 in the retear group; P = .016). In the retear group, there were 10 cases of lateral side tears, 3 cases of midsubstance tears, 2 cases of medial side tears, and 1 case of medial and lateral tears. Reoperation was performed in 8 patients who had lateral insertion tear. CONCLUSION: Overall, clinical scores improved after ASCR in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, 35% (16/46) of the patients showed retear, and lateral side retear occurred in 68% (11/16). The clinical outcome of the patients with preoperative subscapularis atrophy or postoperative lateral side retears was worse, and reoperation was often required. Therefore, it is important that the lateral side be firmly fixed during the ASCR procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7747125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77471252021-01-04 Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery? Lee, Seung-Jun Kang, Suk-Woong Chung, Ilkwon Jang, Hyungseo Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, the results of ASCR are still limited, and little information about retear after ASCR or subsequent treatment has been reported. PURPOSE: To investigate the retear rate of patients who underwent ASCR and to analyze the clinical outcomes of treatments performed for a retear. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 42 patients (46 shoulders) who underwent ASCR between March 2015 and April 2018. All patients were divided into 2 groups: those with no retear (30 shoulders) and those with retear (16 shoulders). Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiological results were compared between the 2 groups. The retear pattern and treatment outcomes of the retear group were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall incidence of retear was 35% (16/46). No difference was found in preoperative demographic or clinical data between the 2 groups. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging data showed a significant between-group difference in the preoperative Goutallier grade of the subscapularis (1.5 ± 1.1 in the no-retear group vs 2.5 ± 1.3 in the retear group; P = .016). In the retear group, there were 10 cases of lateral side tears, 3 cases of midsubstance tears, 2 cases of medial side tears, and 1 case of medial and lateral tears. Reoperation was performed in 8 patients who had lateral insertion tear. CONCLUSION: Overall, clinical scores improved after ASCR in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, 35% (16/46) of the patients showed retear, and lateral side retear occurred in 68% (11/16). The clinical outcome of the patients with preoperative subscapularis atrophy or postoperative lateral side retears was worse, and reoperation was often required. Therefore, it is important that the lateral side be firmly fixed during the ASCR procedure. SAGE Publications 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7747125/ /pubmed/33403209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966410 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Seung-Jun
Kang, Suk-Woong
Chung, Ilkwon
Jang, Hyungseo
Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title_full Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title_fullStr Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title_short Which Factors Influence Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsular Reconstruction Surgery?
title_sort which factors influence clinical outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction surgery?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120966410
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseungjun whichfactorsinfluenceclinicaloutcomesaftersuperiorcapsularreconstructionsurgery
AT kangsukwoong whichfactorsinfluenceclinicaloutcomesaftersuperiorcapsularreconstructionsurgery
AT chungilkwon whichfactorsinfluenceclinicaloutcomesaftersuperiorcapsularreconstructionsurgery
AT janghyungseo whichfactorsinfluenceclinicaloutcomesaftersuperiorcapsularreconstructionsurgery