Cargando…
Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)
INTRODUCTION: Methodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33334836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478 |
_version_ | 1783624960464388096 |
---|---|
author | Lawson, Daeria O Puljak, Livia Pieper, Dawid Schandelmaier, Stefan Collins, Gary S Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Moher, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A Samaan, Zainab Thombs, Brett D Nørskov, Anders K Jakobsen, Janus C Allison, David B Mayo-Wilson, Evan Young, Taryn Chan, An-Wen Briel, Matthias Guyatt, Gordon H Thabane, Lehana Mbuagbaw, Lawrence |
author_facet | Lawson, Daeria O Puljak, Livia Pieper, Dawid Schandelmaier, Stefan Collins, Gary S Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Moher, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A Samaan, Zainab Thombs, Brett D Nørskov, Anders K Jakobsen, Janus C Allison, David B Mayo-Wilson, Evan Young, Taryn Chan, An-Wen Briel, Matthias Guyatt, Gordon H Thabane, Lehana Mbuagbaw, Lawrence |
author_sort | Lawson, Daeria O |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Methodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adherence to guidelines or publication bias. As a result, methodological studies can help to identify knowledge gaps in the methodology of health research and strategies for improvement in research practices. Differences in methodological study names and a lack of reporting guidance contribute to lack of comparability across studies and difficulties in identifying relevant previous methodological studies. This paper outlines the methods we will use to develop an evidence-based tool—the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist—to harmonise naming conventions and improve the reporting of methodological studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for methodological studies in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, check reference lists and contact experts in the field. We will extract and summarise data on the study names, design and reporting features of the included methodological studies. Consensus on study terms and recommended reporting items will be achieved via video conference meetings with a panel of experts including researchers who have published methodological studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The consensus study has been exempt from ethics review by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. The results of the review and the reporting guideline will be disseminated in stakeholder meetings, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, in requests to journal editors (to endorse or make the guideline a requirement for authors), and on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and reporting guideline websites. REGISTRATION: We have registered the development of the reporting guideline with the EQUATOR Network and publicly posted this project on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io/9hgbq). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7747548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77475482020-12-28 Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) Lawson, Daeria O Puljak, Livia Pieper, Dawid Schandelmaier, Stefan Collins, Gary S Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Moher, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A Samaan, Zainab Thombs, Brett D Nørskov, Anders K Jakobsen, Janus C Allison, David B Mayo-Wilson, Evan Young, Taryn Chan, An-Wen Briel, Matthias Guyatt, Gordon H Thabane, Lehana Mbuagbaw, Lawrence BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Methodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adherence to guidelines or publication bias. As a result, methodological studies can help to identify knowledge gaps in the methodology of health research and strategies for improvement in research practices. Differences in methodological study names and a lack of reporting guidance contribute to lack of comparability across studies and difficulties in identifying relevant previous methodological studies. This paper outlines the methods we will use to develop an evidence-based tool—the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist—to harmonise naming conventions and improve the reporting of methodological studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for methodological studies in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, check reference lists and contact experts in the field. We will extract and summarise data on the study names, design and reporting features of the included methodological studies. Consensus on study terms and recommended reporting items will be achieved via video conference meetings with a panel of experts including researchers who have published methodological studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The consensus study has been exempt from ethics review by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. The results of the review and the reporting guideline will be disseminated in stakeholder meetings, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, in requests to journal editors (to endorse or make the guideline a requirement for authors), and on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and reporting guideline websites. REGISTRATION: We have registered the development of the reporting guideline with the EQUATOR Network and publicly posted this project on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io/9hgbq). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7747548/ /pubmed/33334836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Lawson, Daeria O Puljak, Livia Pieper, Dawid Schandelmaier, Stefan Collins, Gary S Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Moher, David Tugwell, Peter Welch, Vivian A Samaan, Zainab Thombs, Brett D Nørskov, Anders K Jakobsen, Janus C Allison, David B Mayo-Wilson, Evan Young, Taryn Chan, An-Wen Briel, Matthias Guyatt, Gordon H Thabane, Lehana Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title | Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title_full | Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title_fullStr | Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title_short | Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) |
title_sort | reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the methodological study reporting checklist (mistic) |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7747548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33334836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawsondaeriao reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT puljaklivia reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT pieperdawid reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT schandelmaierstefan reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT collinsgarys reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT brignardellopetersenromina reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT moherdavid reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT tugwellpeter reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT welchviviana reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT samaanzainab reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT thombsbrettd reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT nørskovandersk reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT jakobsenjanusc reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT allisondavidb reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT mayowilsonevan reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT youngtaryn reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT chananwen reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT brielmatthias reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT guyattgordonh reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT thabanelehana reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic AT mbuagbawlawrence reportingofmethodologicalstudiesinhealthresearchaprotocolforthedevelopmentofthemethodologicalstudyreportingchecklistmistic |