Cargando…
Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573 |
_version_ | 1783625039777628160 |
---|---|
author | Bonde, Jesper Bottari, Fabio Iacobone, Anna D. Cocuzza, Clementina E. Sandri, Maria-Teresa Bogliatto, Fabrizio Khan, Khalid S. Ejegod, Ditte M. Gary, Devin S. Andrews, Jeffrey C. |
author_facet | Bonde, Jesper Bottari, Fabio Iacobone, Anna D. Cocuzza, Clementina E. Sandri, Maria-Teresa Bogliatto, Fabrizio Khan, Khalid S. Ejegod, Ditte M. Gary, Devin S. Andrews, Jeffrey C. |
author_sort | Bonde, Jesper |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [GS]), clearance of HPV infection, or acquisition of a new HPV infection after a negative infection status, during a follow-up testing subsequent to abnormal screening results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to July 2019 for prospective controlled trials and observational studies of women and retrospective studies using HPV assays with extended- or full-genotype reporting. The primary outcome was high-grade CIN after at least 2 rounds of testing. Overall quality of evidence for the risk estimate outcomes was assessed. Of the 830 identified abstracts, 66 full-text articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the synthesis. The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018091093). RESULTS: Continued HPV-positive women falls in 2 equally large groups: SGTP and GS. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio of SGTP were significantly higher than for GS. Human papillomavirus genotypes may be ranked into 3 tiers (immediate colposcopy, follow-up testing, return to routine screening), according to associated risk of persistence for high-grade CIN and to prevailing clinical action thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderately high-quality evidence to support the clinical utility of SGTP to improve risk discrimination for high-grade CIN compared with qualitative HPV testing without genotype-specific information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7748037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77480372020-12-22 Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review Bonde, Jesper Bottari, Fabio Iacobone, Anna D. Cocuzza, Clementina E. Sandri, Maria-Teresa Bogliatto, Fabrizio Khan, Khalid S. Ejegod, Ditte M. Gary, Devin S. Andrews, Jeffrey C. J Low Genit Tract Dis Screening and Treatment OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [GS]), clearance of HPV infection, or acquisition of a new HPV infection after a negative infection status, during a follow-up testing subsequent to abnormal screening results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to July 2019 for prospective controlled trials and observational studies of women and retrospective studies using HPV assays with extended- or full-genotype reporting. The primary outcome was high-grade CIN after at least 2 rounds of testing. Overall quality of evidence for the risk estimate outcomes was assessed. Of the 830 identified abstracts, 66 full-text articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the synthesis. The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018091093). RESULTS: Continued HPV-positive women falls in 2 equally large groups: SGTP and GS. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio of SGTP were significantly higher than for GS. Human papillomavirus genotypes may be ranked into 3 tiers (immediate colposcopy, follow-up testing, return to routine screening), according to associated risk of persistence for high-grade CIN and to prevailing clinical action thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderately high-quality evidence to support the clinical utility of SGTP to improve risk discrimination for high-grade CIN compared with qualitative HPV testing without genotype-specific information. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7748037/ /pubmed/33105450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Screening and Treatment Bonde, Jesper Bottari, Fabio Iacobone, Anna D. Cocuzza, Clementina E. Sandri, Maria-Teresa Bogliatto, Fabrizio Khan, Khalid S. Ejegod, Ditte M. Gary, Devin S. Andrews, Jeffrey C. Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title | Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | human papillomavirus same genotype persistence and risk: a systematic review |
topic | Screening and Treatment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bondejesper humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT bottarifabio humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT iacoboneannad humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT cocuzzaclementinae humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT sandrimariateresa humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT bogliattofabrizio humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT khankhalids humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT ejegoddittem humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT garydevins humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview AT andrewsjeffreyc humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview |