Cargando…

Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonde, Jesper, Bottari, Fabio, Iacobone, Anna D., Cocuzza, Clementina E., Sandri, Maria-Teresa, Bogliatto, Fabrizio, Khan, Khalid S., Ejegod, Ditte M., Gary, Devin S., Andrews, Jeffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573
_version_ 1783625039777628160
author Bonde, Jesper
Bottari, Fabio
Iacobone, Anna D.
Cocuzza, Clementina E.
Sandri, Maria-Teresa
Bogliatto, Fabrizio
Khan, Khalid S.
Ejegod, Ditte M.
Gary, Devin S.
Andrews, Jeffrey C.
author_facet Bonde, Jesper
Bottari, Fabio
Iacobone, Anna D.
Cocuzza, Clementina E.
Sandri, Maria-Teresa
Bogliatto, Fabrizio
Khan, Khalid S.
Ejegod, Ditte M.
Gary, Devin S.
Andrews, Jeffrey C.
author_sort Bonde, Jesper
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [GS]), clearance of HPV infection, or acquisition of a new HPV infection after a negative infection status, during a follow-up testing subsequent to abnormal screening results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to July 2019 for prospective controlled trials and observational studies of women and retrospective studies using HPV assays with extended- or full-genotype reporting. The primary outcome was high-grade CIN after at least 2 rounds of testing. Overall quality of evidence for the risk estimate outcomes was assessed. Of the 830 identified abstracts, 66 full-text articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the synthesis. The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018091093). RESULTS: Continued HPV-positive women falls in 2 equally large groups: SGTP and GS. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio of SGTP were significantly higher than for GS. Human papillomavirus genotypes may be ranked into 3 tiers (immediate colposcopy, follow-up testing, return to routine screening), according to associated risk of persistence for high-grade CIN and to prevailing clinical action thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderately high-quality evidence to support the clinical utility of SGTP to improve risk discrimination for high-grade CIN compared with qualitative HPV testing without genotype-specific information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7748037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77480372020-12-22 Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review Bonde, Jesper Bottari, Fabio Iacobone, Anna D. Cocuzza, Clementina E. Sandri, Maria-Teresa Bogliatto, Fabrizio Khan, Khalid S. Ejegod, Ditte M. Gary, Devin S. Andrews, Jeffrey C. J Low Genit Tract Dis Screening and Treatment OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine whether high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was more closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) same-genotype persistence (SGTP) versus clearance of prior infection with a subsequent infection by a new genotype (genotype switch [GS]), clearance of HPV infection, or acquisition of a new HPV infection after a negative infection status, during a follow-up testing subsequent to abnormal screening results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to July 2019 for prospective controlled trials and observational studies of women and retrospective studies using HPV assays with extended- or full-genotype reporting. The primary outcome was high-grade CIN after at least 2 rounds of testing. Overall quality of evidence for the risk estimate outcomes was assessed. Of the 830 identified abstracts, 66 full-text articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the synthesis. The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018091093). RESULTS: Continued HPV-positive women falls in 2 equally large groups: SGTP and GS. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio of SGTP were significantly higher than for GS. Human papillomavirus genotypes may be ranked into 3 tiers (immediate colposcopy, follow-up testing, return to routine screening), according to associated risk of persistence for high-grade CIN and to prevailing clinical action thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: There is moderately high-quality evidence to support the clinical utility of SGTP to improve risk discrimination for high-grade CIN compared with qualitative HPV testing without genotype-specific information. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7748037/ /pubmed/33105450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Screening and Treatment
Bonde, Jesper
Bottari, Fabio
Iacobone, Anna D.
Cocuzza, Clementina E.
Sandri, Maria-Teresa
Bogliatto, Fabrizio
Khan, Khalid S.
Ejegod, Ditte M.
Gary, Devin S.
Andrews, Jeffrey C.
Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title_full Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title_short Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk: A Systematic Review
title_sort human papillomavirus same genotype persistence and risk: a systematic review
topic Screening and Treatment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000573
work_keys_str_mv AT bondejesper humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT bottarifabio humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT iacoboneannad humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT cocuzzaclementinae humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT sandrimariateresa humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT bogliattofabrizio humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT khankhalids humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT ejegoddittem humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT garydevins humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview
AT andrewsjeffreyc humanpapillomavirussamegenotypepersistenceandriskasystematicreview