Cargando…

A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants

BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Bryce R., Becnel, Chad M., Chan, Leland P., Minetos, Paul D., Clarke, John F., Kahn, Marc J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147
_version_ 1783625059940696064
author Christensen, Bryce R.
Becnel, Chad M.
Chan, Leland P.
Minetos, Paul D.
Clarke, John F.
Kahn, Marc J.
author_facet Christensen, Bryce R.
Becnel, Chad M.
Chan, Leland P.
Minetos, Paul D.
Clarke, John F.
Kahn, Marc J.
author_sort Christensen, Bryce R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes. METHODS: Utilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017–2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student’s t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Compared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7748145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77481452020-12-31 A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants Christensen, Bryce R. Becnel, Chad M. Chan, Leland P. Minetos, Paul D. Clarke, John F. Kahn, Marc J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes. METHODS: Utilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017–2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student’s t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Compared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity. Public Library of Science 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7748145/ /pubmed/33338062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christensen, Bryce R.
Becnel, Chad M.
Chan, Leland P.
Minetos, Paul D.
Clarke, John F.
Kahn, Marc J.
A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title_full A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title_fullStr A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title_short A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
title_sort comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenbrycer acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT becnelchadm acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT chanlelandp acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT minetospauld acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT clarkejohnf acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT kahnmarcj acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT christensenbrycer comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT becnelchadm comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT chanlelandp comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT minetospauld comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT clarkejohnf comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants
AT kahnmarcj comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants