Cargando…
A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants
BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147 |
_version_ | 1783625059940696064 |
---|---|
author | Christensen, Bryce R. Becnel, Chad M. Chan, Leland P. Minetos, Paul D. Clarke, John F. Kahn, Marc J. |
author_facet | Christensen, Bryce R. Becnel, Chad M. Chan, Leland P. Minetos, Paul D. Clarke, John F. Kahn, Marc J. |
author_sort | Christensen, Bryce R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes. METHODS: Utilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017–2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student’s t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Compared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7748145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77481452020-12-31 A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants Christensen, Bryce R. Becnel, Chad M. Chan, Leland P. Minetos, Paul D. Clarke, John F. Kahn, Marc J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Dual degrees combining and MD with another professional degree (MPH, MBA, or PhD) are becoming more common in an attempt to increase an applicant’s competitivity for a residency. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess differences in MD-only and dual degree MD applicants with respect to applicant characteristics and match outcomes. METHODS: Utilizing the voluntarily-reported publicly available 2017–2019 Texas STAR database, we assessed applicants from 115 medical schools. Texas STAR indicates that over this time period, there were 18,224 responses for a response rate of 43.8%. Comparisons were made between groups using student’s t-test and chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: Compared to MD only students, MD/MPH applicants had a higher propensity towards primary care specialties. MD/PhD applicants did not differ versus MD only applicants in their selection of primary care specialties, or of competitive specialties. MD/MBA applicants chose more competitive specialties and less primary care specialties. Despite all these differences, match rates were not different comparing MD only and dual-degree students. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing popularity of combined MD programs, such programs do not appear to increase applicant match competitivity. Public Library of Science 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7748145/ /pubmed/33338062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Christensen, Bryce R. Becnel, Chad M. Chan, Leland P. Minetos, Paul D. Clarke, John F. Kahn, Marc J. A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title | A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title_full | A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title_fullStr | A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title_short | A comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
title_sort | comparison of match outcomes between traditional medical degree and dual-degree applicants |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christensenbrycer acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT becnelchadm acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT chanlelandp acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT minetospauld acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT clarkejohnf acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT kahnmarcj acomparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT christensenbrycer comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT becnelchadm comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT chanlelandp comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT minetospauld comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT clarkejohnf comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants AT kahnmarcj comparisonofmatchoutcomesbetweentraditionalmedicaldegreeanddualdegreeapplicants |