Cargando…
Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States
BACKGROUND: There are limited contemporary data on the influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of insurance status on STEMI outcomes. METHODS: Adult (>18 years) STEMI admissions were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243810 |
_version_ | 1783625101316456448 |
---|---|
author | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Kumar, Vinayak Sundaragiri, Pranathi R. Cheungpasitporn, Wisit Bell, Malcolm R. Singh, Mandeep Jaffe, Allan S. Barsness, Gregory W. |
author_facet | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Kumar, Vinayak Sundaragiri, Pranathi R. Cheungpasitporn, Wisit Bell, Malcolm R. Singh, Mandeep Jaffe, Allan S. Barsness, Gregory W. |
author_sort | Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are limited contemporary data on the influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of insurance status on STEMI outcomes. METHODS: Adult (>18 years) STEMI admissions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database (2000–2017). Expected primary payer was classified into Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured and others. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), hospitalization costs, hospital length of stay and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of the 4,310,703 STEMI admissions, Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured and other insurances were noted in 49.0%, 6.3%, 34.4%, 7.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Compared to the others, the Medicare cohort was older (75 vs. 53–57 years), more often female (46% vs. 20–36%), of white race, and with higher comorbidity (all p<0.001). The Medicare and Medicaid population had higher rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. The Medicare cohort had higher in-hospital mortality (14.2%) compared to the other groups (4.1–6.7%), p<0.001. In a multivariable analysis (Medicare referent), in-hospital mortality was higher in uninsured (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.14 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.11–1.16]), and lower in Medicaid (aOR 0.96 [95% CI 0.94–0.99]; p = 0.002), privately insured (aOR 0.73 [95% CI 0.72–0.75]) and other insurance (aOR 0.91 [95% CI 0.88–0.94]); all p<0.001. Coronary angiography (60% vs. 77–82%) and PCI (45% vs. 63–70%) were used less frequently in the Medicare population compared to others. The Medicare and Medicaid populations had longer lengths of hospital stay, and the Medicare population had the lowest hospitalization costs and fewer discharges to home. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other types of primary payers, STEMI admissions with Medicare insurance had lower use of coronary angiography and PCI, and higher in-hospital mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7748387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77483872021-01-07 Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Kumar, Vinayak Sundaragiri, Pranathi R. Cheungpasitporn, Wisit Bell, Malcolm R. Singh, Mandeep Jaffe, Allan S. Barsness, Gregory W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There are limited contemporary data on the influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of insurance status on STEMI outcomes. METHODS: Adult (>18 years) STEMI admissions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database (2000–2017). Expected primary payer was classified into Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured and others. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), hospitalization costs, hospital length of stay and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Of the 4,310,703 STEMI admissions, Medicare, Medicaid, private, uninsured and other insurances were noted in 49.0%, 6.3%, 34.4%, 7.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Compared to the others, the Medicare cohort was older (75 vs. 53–57 years), more often female (46% vs. 20–36%), of white race, and with higher comorbidity (all p<0.001). The Medicare and Medicaid population had higher rates of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. The Medicare cohort had higher in-hospital mortality (14.2%) compared to the other groups (4.1–6.7%), p<0.001. In a multivariable analysis (Medicare referent), in-hospital mortality was higher in uninsured (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.14 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.11–1.16]), and lower in Medicaid (aOR 0.96 [95% CI 0.94–0.99]; p = 0.002), privately insured (aOR 0.73 [95% CI 0.72–0.75]) and other insurance (aOR 0.91 [95% CI 0.88–0.94]); all p<0.001. Coronary angiography (60% vs. 77–82%) and PCI (45% vs. 63–70%) were used less frequently in the Medicare population compared to others. The Medicare and Medicaid populations had longer lengths of hospital stay, and the Medicare population had the lowest hospitalization costs and fewer discharges to home. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other types of primary payers, STEMI admissions with Medicare insurance had lower use of coronary angiography and PCI, and higher in-hospital mortality. Public Library of Science 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7748387/ /pubmed/33338071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243810 Text en © 2020 Vallabhajosyula et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra Kumar, Vinayak Sundaragiri, Pranathi R. Cheungpasitporn, Wisit Bell, Malcolm R. Singh, Mandeep Jaffe, Allan S. Barsness, Gregory W. Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title | Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title_full | Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title_fullStr | Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title_short | Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States |
title_sort | influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of st-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the united states |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vallabhajosyulasaraschandra influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT kumarvinayak influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT sundaragiripranathir influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT cheungpasitpornwisit influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT bellmalcolmr influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT singhmandeep influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT jaffeallans influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates AT barsnessgregoryw influenceofprimarypayerstatusonthemanagementandoutcomesofstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionintheunitedstates |