Cargando…

Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees

Objective  To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods  Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobke, Lothar Schmechel, Bonadiman, João Artur, Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão, Saggin, Paulo Renato, Israel, Charles Leonardo, Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520
_version_ 1783625226964172800
author Dobke, Lothar Schmechel
Bonadiman, João Artur
Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão
Saggin, Paulo Renato
Israel, Charles Leonardo
Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas
author_facet Dobke, Lothar Schmechel
Bonadiman, João Artur
Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão
Saggin, Paulo Renato
Israel, Charles Leonardo
Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas
author_sort Dobke, Lothar Schmechel
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods  Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results  The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups ( p  < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion  Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7748938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77489382020-12-22 Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees Dobke, Lothar Schmechel Bonadiman, João Artur Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão Saggin, Paulo Renato Israel, Charles Leonardo Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods  Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results  The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups ( p  < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion  Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020-12 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7748938/ /pubmed/33364658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dobke, Lothar Schmechel
Bonadiman, João Artur
Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão
Saggin, Paulo Renato
Israel, Charles Leonardo
Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_full Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_fullStr Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_short Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_sort biomechanical study of different femoral fixation devices in the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in porcine knees
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520
work_keys_str_mv AT dobkelotharschmechel biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees
AT bonadimanjoaoartur biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees
AT lopesjrosmarvaladao biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees
AT sagginpaulorenato biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees
AT israelcharlesleonardo biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees
AT spinellileandrodefreitas biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees