Cargando…
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520 |
_version_ | 1783625226964172800 |
---|---|
author | Dobke, Lothar Schmechel Bonadiman, João Artur Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão Saggin, Paulo Renato Israel, Charles Leonardo Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas |
author_facet | Dobke, Lothar Schmechel Bonadiman, João Artur Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão Saggin, Paulo Renato Israel, Charles Leonardo Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas |
author_sort | Dobke, Lothar Schmechel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups ( p < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7748938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77489382020-12-22 Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees Dobke, Lothar Schmechel Bonadiman, João Artur Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão Saggin, Paulo Renato Israel, Charles Leonardo Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups ( p < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2020-12 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7748938/ /pubmed/33364658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dobke, Lothar Schmechel Bonadiman, João Artur Lopes Jr, Osmar Valadão Saggin, Paulo Renato Israel, Charles Leonardo Spinelli, Leandro de Freitas Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees |
title |
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
|
title_full |
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
|
title_fullStr |
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
|
title_short |
Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
|
title_sort | biomechanical study of different femoral fixation devices in the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in porcine knees |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7748938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dobkelotharschmechel biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees AT bonadimanjoaoartur biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees AT lopesjrosmarvaladao biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees AT sagginpaulorenato biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees AT israelcharlesleonardo biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees AT spinellileandrodefreitas biomechanicalstudyofdifferentfemoralfixationdevicesinthereconstructionofthemedialpatellofemoralligamentinporcineknees |