Cargando…
Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed recent peer-reviewed literature on three categories of individual- and household-level interventions against air pollution: air purifiers, facemasks, and behavior change. RECENT FINDINGS: High-efficiency particulate air/arresting (HEPA) filter air purifier use over day...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00296-z |
_version_ | 1783625240655429632 |
---|---|
author | Allen, Ryan W. Barn, Prabjit |
author_facet | Allen, Ryan W. Barn, Prabjit |
author_sort | Allen, Ryan W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed recent peer-reviewed literature on three categories of individual- and household-level interventions against air pollution: air purifiers, facemasks, and behavior change. RECENT FINDINGS: High-efficiency particulate air/arresting (HEPA) filter air purifier use over days to weeks can substantially reduce fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) concentrations indoors and improve subclinical cardiopulmonary health. Modeling studies suggest that the population-level benefits of HEPA filter air purification would often exceed costs. Well-fitting N95 and equivalent respirators can reduce PM(2.5) exposure, with several randomized crossover studies also reporting improvements in subclinical cardiovascular health. The health benefits of other types of face coverings have not been tested and their effectiveness in reducing exposure is highly variable, depends largely on fit, and is unrelated to cost. Behavior modifications may reduce exposure, but there has been little research on health impacts. SUMMARY: There is now substantial evidence that HEPA filter air purifiers reduce indoor PM(2.5) concentrations and improve subclinical health indicators. As a result, their use is being recommended by a growing number of government and public health organizations. Several studies have also reported subclinical cardiovascular health benefits from well-fitting respirators, while evidence of health benefits from other types of facemasks and behavior changes remains very limited. In situations when emissions cannot be controlled at the source, such as during forest fires, individual- or household-level interventions may be the primary option. In most cases, however, such interventions should be supplemental to emission reduction efforts that benefit entire communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7749091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77490912020-12-21 Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature Allen, Ryan W. Barn, Prabjit Curr Environ Health Rep Air Pollution and Health (S Adar and B Hoffmann, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed recent peer-reviewed literature on three categories of individual- and household-level interventions against air pollution: air purifiers, facemasks, and behavior change. RECENT FINDINGS: High-efficiency particulate air/arresting (HEPA) filter air purifier use over days to weeks can substantially reduce fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) concentrations indoors and improve subclinical cardiopulmonary health. Modeling studies suggest that the population-level benefits of HEPA filter air purification would often exceed costs. Well-fitting N95 and equivalent respirators can reduce PM(2.5) exposure, with several randomized crossover studies also reporting improvements in subclinical cardiovascular health. The health benefits of other types of face coverings have not been tested and their effectiveness in reducing exposure is highly variable, depends largely on fit, and is unrelated to cost. Behavior modifications may reduce exposure, but there has been little research on health impacts. SUMMARY: There is now substantial evidence that HEPA filter air purifiers reduce indoor PM(2.5) concentrations and improve subclinical health indicators. As a result, their use is being recommended by a growing number of government and public health organizations. Several studies have also reported subclinical cardiovascular health benefits from well-fitting respirators, while evidence of health benefits from other types of facemasks and behavior changes remains very limited. In situations when emissions cannot be controlled at the source, such as during forest fires, individual- or household-level interventions may be the primary option. In most cases, however, such interventions should be supplemental to emission reduction efforts that benefit entire communities. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7749091/ /pubmed/33241434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00296-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Air Pollution and Health (S Adar and B Hoffmann, Section Editors) Allen, Ryan W. Barn, Prabjit Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title | Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title_full | Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title_fullStr | Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title_short | Individual- and Household-Level Interventions to Reduce Air Pollution Exposures and Health Risks: a Review of the Recent Literature |
title_sort | individual- and household-level interventions to reduce air pollution exposures and health risks: a review of the recent literature |
topic | Air Pollution and Health (S Adar and B Hoffmann, Section Editors) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00296-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenryanw individualandhouseholdlevelinterventionstoreduceairpollutionexposuresandhealthrisksareviewoftherecentliterature AT barnprabjit individualandhouseholdlevelinterventionstoreduceairpollutionexposuresandhealthrisksareviewoftherecentliterature |