Cargando…

Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study

The aim was to compare short-term results of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES (NSR) with traditional laparoscopic technique in sigmoid resection (LSR) in cases of diverticulitis. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery has been evolved as a minimally invasive procedure to reduce the operative traum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derstadt, Marie, Thomaidis, Panagiotis, Seefeldt, Claudia S., Lange, Jonas, Meyer, Jurgen, Ströhlein, Michael A., Heiss, Markus M., Bulian, Dirk R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33339895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79461-1
_version_ 1783625243372290048
author Derstadt, Marie
Thomaidis, Panagiotis
Seefeldt, Claudia S.
Lange, Jonas
Meyer, Jurgen
Ströhlein, Michael A.
Heiss, Markus M.
Bulian, Dirk R.
author_facet Derstadt, Marie
Thomaidis, Panagiotis
Seefeldt, Claudia S.
Lange, Jonas
Meyer, Jurgen
Ströhlein, Michael A.
Heiss, Markus M.
Bulian, Dirk R.
author_sort Derstadt, Marie
collection PubMed
description The aim was to compare short-term results of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES (NSR) with traditional laparoscopic technique in sigmoid resection (LSR) in cases of diverticulitis. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery has been evolved as a minimally invasive procedure to reduce the operative trauma due to the absence of specimen extraction through the abdominal wall causing less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. Despite the increasing use and published case series of NSR for diverticulitis as a laparoscopic procedure with transvaginal stapling and specimen extraction, there are no studies comparing this procedure with LSR. Twenty NSR patients operated at the Cologne-Merheim Medical Center have been documented and compared with 20 female LSR patients matched for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists-classification (ASA), Hansen/Stock classification, and age. To ensure comparability regarding peri- and postoperative care, only procedures performed by the same surgeon were included. Procedural time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, postoperative pain, the duration of an epidural catheter, analgesic consumption, and postoperative length of hospital stay were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the sum of pain levels (p = 0.930), length of procedure (p = 0.079), intra- and postoperative complications, as well as duration of an epidural catheter. On the contrary, there were significant positive effects for NSR on morphine requirement at day seven and eight (p = 0.019 and p = 0.035 respectively) as well as the postoperative length of hospital stay (p = 0.031). This retrospective study reveals significant positive effects for NSR compared to LSR regarding length of hospital stay as well as morphine consumption after removal of the epidural catheter, whereas there were no significant differences in complication rate and procedural time. In summary, NSR is an adequate alternative to traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection considering the surgeons experience and the patient’s personal preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77491032020-12-22 Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study Derstadt, Marie Thomaidis, Panagiotis Seefeldt, Claudia S. Lange, Jonas Meyer, Jurgen Ströhlein, Michael A. Heiss, Markus M. Bulian, Dirk R. Sci Rep Article The aim was to compare short-term results of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES (NSR) with traditional laparoscopic technique in sigmoid resection (LSR) in cases of diverticulitis. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery has been evolved as a minimally invasive procedure to reduce the operative trauma due to the absence of specimen extraction through the abdominal wall causing less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. Despite the increasing use and published case series of NSR for diverticulitis as a laparoscopic procedure with transvaginal stapling and specimen extraction, there are no studies comparing this procedure with LSR. Twenty NSR patients operated at the Cologne-Merheim Medical Center have been documented and compared with 20 female LSR patients matched for body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists-classification (ASA), Hansen/Stock classification, and age. To ensure comparability regarding peri- and postoperative care, only procedures performed by the same surgeon were included. Procedural time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, postoperative pain, the duration of an epidural catheter, analgesic consumption, and postoperative length of hospital stay were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the sum of pain levels (p = 0.930), length of procedure (p = 0.079), intra- and postoperative complications, as well as duration of an epidural catheter. On the contrary, there were significant positive effects for NSR on morphine requirement at day seven and eight (p = 0.019 and p = 0.035 respectively) as well as the postoperative length of hospital stay (p = 0.031). This retrospective study reveals significant positive effects for NSR compared to LSR regarding length of hospital stay as well as morphine consumption after removal of the epidural catheter, whereas there were no significant differences in complication rate and procedural time. In summary, NSR is an adequate alternative to traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection considering the surgeons experience and the patient’s personal preferences. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7749103/ /pubmed/33339895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79461-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Derstadt, Marie
Thomaidis, Panagiotis
Seefeldt, Claudia S.
Lange, Jonas
Meyer, Jurgen
Ströhlein, Michael A.
Heiss, Markus M.
Bulian, Dirk R.
Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title_full Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title_fullStr Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title_short Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
title_sort transvaginal hybrid-notes vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33339895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79461-1
work_keys_str_mv AT derstadtmarie transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT thomaidispanagiotis transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT seefeldtclaudias transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT langejonas transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT meyerjurgen transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT strohleinmichaela transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT heissmarkusm transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy
AT buliandirkr transvaginalhybridnotesvstraditionallaparoscopicsigmoidresectionfordiverticulitisashorttermcomparativestudy