Cargando…

Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Vaquero, María Pilar, Barbado, David, Juan-Recio, Casto, López-Valenciano, Alejandro, Vera-Garcia, Francisco J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai University of Sport 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011
_version_ 1783625266933792768
author García-Vaquero, María Pilar
Barbado, David
Juan-Recio, Casto
López-Valenciano, Alejandro
Vera-Garcia, Francisco J.
author_facet García-Vaquero, María Pilar
Barbado, David
Juan-Recio, Casto
López-Valenciano, Alejandro
Vera-Garcia, Francisco J.
author_sort García-Vaquero, María Pilar
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examined. METHODS: Fifty-seven healthy and physically active young men (n = 28) and women (n = 29) performed the isokinetic protocol 5 times, separated by a week between each of the first 4 sessions and by a month between the last 2 sessions. The protocol consisted of performing 4 trials of 15 maximum flexion–extension concentric exertions at 120°/s (range of trunk motion = 50°). The absolute and relative peak torque and total work were calculated to assess trunk flexion and extension strength. In addition, endurance ratio, modified endurance ratio, fatigue final ratio, recovery ratio, and modified recovery ratio variables were used for the assessment of trunk muscle endurance in both directions. RESULTS: Regarding the absolute reliability, no relevant changes were found between paired-comparison sessions for most strength and endurance variables, except for total work and relative total work variables in the flexion movement in both sexes. In addition, the typical error of the isokinetic variables was lower than 10% in both males and females, and minimum detectable changes ranged from 7% to 20%, with a tendency to be higher in females and in endurance variables. The strength variables showed high-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; >0.74); however, for the endurance variables only the endurance ratio and the modified endurance ratio obtained moderate-to-high ICC values (0.57 < ICC < 0.82). In addition, the analysis of the variance reported no significant differences between consecutive pairs of sessions for most variables in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Overall, these findings provide clinicians, trainers, and researchers with a 10-min single-session protocol to perform a reliable muscle strength and endurance evaluation of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, all within the same protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shanghai University of Sport
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77492122020-12-23 Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences García-Vaquero, María Pilar Barbado, David Juan-Recio, Casto López-Valenciano, Alejandro Vera-Garcia, Francisco J. J Sport Health Sci Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examined. METHODS: Fifty-seven healthy and physically active young men (n = 28) and women (n = 29) performed the isokinetic protocol 5 times, separated by a week between each of the first 4 sessions and by a month between the last 2 sessions. The protocol consisted of performing 4 trials of 15 maximum flexion–extension concentric exertions at 120°/s (range of trunk motion = 50°). The absolute and relative peak torque and total work were calculated to assess trunk flexion and extension strength. In addition, endurance ratio, modified endurance ratio, fatigue final ratio, recovery ratio, and modified recovery ratio variables were used for the assessment of trunk muscle endurance in both directions. RESULTS: Regarding the absolute reliability, no relevant changes were found between paired-comparison sessions for most strength and endurance variables, except for total work and relative total work variables in the flexion movement in both sexes. In addition, the typical error of the isokinetic variables was lower than 10% in both males and females, and minimum detectable changes ranged from 7% to 20%, with a tendency to be higher in females and in endurance variables. The strength variables showed high-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; >0.74); however, for the endurance variables only the endurance ratio and the modified endurance ratio obtained moderate-to-high ICC values (0.57 < ICC < 0.82). In addition, the analysis of the variance reported no significant differences between consecutive pairs of sessions for most variables in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Overall, these findings provide clinicians, trainers, and researchers with a 10-min single-session protocol to perform a reliable muscle strength and endurance evaluation of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, all within the same protocol. Shanghai University of Sport 2020-12 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7749212/ /pubmed/33308821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
García-Vaquero, María Pilar
Barbado, David
Juan-Recio, Casto
López-Valenciano, Alejandro
Vera-Garcia, Francisco J.
Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title_full Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title_fullStr Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title_full_unstemmed Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title_short Isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
title_sort isokinetic trunk flexion–extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.08.011
work_keys_str_mv AT garciavaqueromariapilar isokinetictrunkflexionextensionprotocoltoassesstrunkmusclestrengthandendurancereliabilitylearningeffectandsexdifferences
AT barbadodavid isokinetictrunkflexionextensionprotocoltoassesstrunkmusclestrengthandendurancereliabilitylearningeffectandsexdifferences
AT juanreciocasto isokinetictrunkflexionextensionprotocoltoassesstrunkmusclestrengthandendurancereliabilitylearningeffectandsexdifferences
AT lopezvalencianoalejandro isokinetictrunkflexionextensionprotocoltoassesstrunkmusclestrengthandendurancereliabilitylearningeffectandsexdifferences
AT veragarciafranciscoj isokinetictrunkflexionextensionprotocoltoassesstrunkmusclestrengthandendurancereliabilitylearningeffectandsexdifferences