Cargando…

Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients with cirrhosis up to date with vaccinations and associations of vaccination with age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, and type of provider follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in Rochester and Mayo Cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmmad, Eimad M., Roberts, Lewis R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.06.007
_version_ 1783625276267167744
author Ahmmad, Eimad M.
Roberts, Lewis R.
author_facet Ahmmad, Eimad M.
Roberts, Lewis R.
author_sort Ahmmad, Eimad M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients with cirrhosis up to date with vaccinations and associations of vaccination with age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, and type of provider follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System in Minnesota from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009, were followed up from diagnosis until May 31, 2015. Data were abstracted from Mayo Clinic and Minnesota State records. Factors determining vaccination coverage were assessed. RESULTS: At the end of the study period (8 years follow-up), 26.4% (95 of 360), 24.7% (82 of 332), 63.2% (180 of 285), and 25.5% (54 of 212) of patients with cirrhosis were up to date with hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus, pneumococcal pneumonia (PN), and herpes zoster vaccinations, respectively. Influenza (FLU) vaccine coverage increased from 36.1% (57 of 158) in 2007 to 2008 to 65.8% (106 of 161) in 2014 to 2015. Of those unvaccinated for HAV and hepatitis B virus before cirrhosis diagnosis, 18.6% (59 of 318) and 23.4% (71 of 304) completed vaccination. For HAV, more whites than nonwhites (28.3% [91 of 322] vs 10.5% [4 of 38]; odds ratio [OR], 3.35; 95% CI, 1.29 to 11.45; P=.02) and more non-Hispanics than Hispanics (27.4% [95 of 347] vs 0% [0 of 13]; OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.43; P=.03) were vaccinated. For PN, more younger than elderly people (66.8% [135 of 202] vs 54.2% [45 of 83]; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.87; P=.04) and married vs single people (56.8% [100 of 176] vs 73.4% [80 of 109]; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.56; P=.005) were vaccinated. For FLU, in 2013 to 2014, more elderly (72.0% [54 of 75] vs 58.0% [69 of 119]; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.99; P=.05); in 2008 to 2009, more Hispanics (100% [4 of 4] vs 41.6% [116 of 279]; OR, ∞; 95% CI, 2.25 to ∞; P=.02); and in 2011 to 2012, more married people (62.4% [101 of 162] vs 50.5% [56 of 111]; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.1.0 to 2.66; P=.05) were vaccinated. For FLU in 2008 to 2009, coverage was higher in the primary care than the specialist setting (55.8% [48 of 86] vs 36.6% [72 of 197]; P=.003). CONCLUSION: Except for PN and FLU, vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis falls short of Healthy People 2020 target. Specific interventions are needed to improve vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77492612020-12-22 Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage Ahmmad, Eimad M. Roberts, Lewis R. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients with cirrhosis up to date with vaccinations and associations of vaccination with age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, and type of provider follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System in Minnesota from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009, were followed up from diagnosis until May 31, 2015. Data were abstracted from Mayo Clinic and Minnesota State records. Factors determining vaccination coverage were assessed. RESULTS: At the end of the study period (8 years follow-up), 26.4% (95 of 360), 24.7% (82 of 332), 63.2% (180 of 285), and 25.5% (54 of 212) of patients with cirrhosis were up to date with hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus, pneumococcal pneumonia (PN), and herpes zoster vaccinations, respectively. Influenza (FLU) vaccine coverage increased from 36.1% (57 of 158) in 2007 to 2008 to 65.8% (106 of 161) in 2014 to 2015. Of those unvaccinated for HAV and hepatitis B virus before cirrhosis diagnosis, 18.6% (59 of 318) and 23.4% (71 of 304) completed vaccination. For HAV, more whites than nonwhites (28.3% [91 of 322] vs 10.5% [4 of 38]; odds ratio [OR], 3.35; 95% CI, 1.29 to 11.45; P=.02) and more non-Hispanics than Hispanics (27.4% [95 of 347] vs 0% [0 of 13]; OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.43; P=.03) were vaccinated. For PN, more younger than elderly people (66.8% [135 of 202] vs 54.2% [45 of 83]; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.87; P=.04) and married vs single people (56.8% [100 of 176] vs 73.4% [80 of 109]; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.56; P=.005) were vaccinated. For FLU, in 2013 to 2014, more elderly (72.0% [54 of 75] vs 58.0% [69 of 119]; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.99; P=.05); in 2008 to 2009, more Hispanics (100% [4 of 4] vs 41.6% [116 of 279]; OR, ∞; 95% CI, 2.25 to ∞; P=.02); and in 2011 to 2012, more married people (62.4% [101 of 162] vs 50.5% [56 of 111]; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.1.0 to 2.66; P=.05) were vaccinated. For FLU in 2008 to 2009, coverage was higher in the primary care than the specialist setting (55.8% [48 of 86] vs 36.6% [72 of 197]; P=.003). CONCLUSION: Except for PN and FLU, vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis falls short of Healthy People 2020 target. Specific interventions are needed to improve vaccination coverage in patients with cirrhosis. Elsevier 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7749261/ /pubmed/33367212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.06.007 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmmad, Eimad M.
Roberts, Lewis R.
Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title_full Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title_fullStr Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title_short Quality of Care in Patients With Cirrhosis: Trends in Recommended Adult Vaccination Coverage
title_sort quality of care in patients with cirrhosis: trends in recommended adult vaccination coverage
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.06.007
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmmadeimadm qualityofcareinpatientswithcirrhosistrendsinrecommendedadultvaccinationcoverage
AT robertslewisr qualityofcareinpatientswithcirrhosistrendsinrecommendedadultvaccinationcoverage