Cargando…

A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects

OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Shaima, Skrobola, Mike, Obamiyi, Samuel, Feng, Changyong, Wang, Zhihui, Rossouw, P. Emile, Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20
_version_ 1783625305644072960
author Malik, Shaima
Skrobola, Mike
Obamiyi, Samuel
Feng, Changyong
Wang, Zhihui
Rossouw, P. Emile
Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios
author_facet Malik, Shaima
Skrobola, Mike
Obamiyi, Samuel
Feng, Changyong
Wang, Zhihui
Rossouw, P. Emile
Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios
author_sort Malik, Shaima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and females. Each group was divided equally into 7 chronological age-groups, ranging from 9 to 15 years. Dental age was determined from panoramic radiographs as primary, early mixed, late mixed, or permanent dentition (scored as 1-4). Skeletal age was calculated from hand-wrist radiographs using Fishman's Skeletal Maturation Index (SMI 1-11). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were used to compare skeletal and dental ages among AA, C and H subjects; and AA, C and H subjects in each chronological age-group. The two-sample t-test was used to compare SMI and dental age among females and males. RESULTS: Skeletal and dental age were not significantly different between AA, C and H subjects. Mean SMI was higher in females than males; and there were no significant gender differences regarding dental age. Mean SMI and dental age were significantly different among AA, C and H subjects in the 12-year-old and 11-year-old age groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dental and skeletal maturation are fairly similar among AA, C and H subjects (aged 9 to 15 years).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77494522020-12-21 A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects Malik, Shaima Skrobola, Mike Obamiyi, Samuel Feng, Changyong Wang, Zhihui Rossouw, P. Emile Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and females. Each group was divided equally into 7 chronological age-groups, ranging from 9 to 15 years. Dental age was determined from panoramic radiographs as primary, early mixed, late mixed, or permanent dentition (scored as 1-4). Skeletal age was calculated from hand-wrist radiographs using Fishman's Skeletal Maturation Index (SMI 1-11). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were used to compare skeletal and dental ages among AA, C and H subjects; and AA, C and H subjects in each chronological age-group. The two-sample t-test was used to compare SMI and dental age among females and males. RESULTS: Skeletal and dental age were not significantly different between AA, C and H subjects. Mean SMI was higher in females than males; and there were no significant gender differences regarding dental age. Mean SMI and dental age were significantly different among AA, C and H subjects in the 12-year-old and 11-year-old age groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dental and skeletal maturation are fairly similar among AA, C and H subjects (aged 9 to 15 years). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7749452/ /pubmed/33354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malik, Shaima
Skrobola, Mike
Obamiyi, Samuel
Feng, Changyong
Wang, Zhihui
Rossouw, P. Emile
Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios
A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title_full A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title_fullStr A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title_short A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
title_sort retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between african american, caucasian, and hispanic subjects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354537
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20
work_keys_str_mv AT malikshaima aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT skrobolamike aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT obamiyisamuel aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT fengchangyong aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT wangzhihui aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT rossouwpemile aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT michelogiannakisdimitrios aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT malikshaima retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT skrobolamike retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT obamiyisamuel retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT fengchangyong retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT wangzhihui retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT rossouwpemile retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects
AT michelogiannakisdimitrios retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects