Cargando…
A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects
OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20 |
_version_ | 1783625305644072960 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Shaima Skrobola, Mike Obamiyi, Samuel Feng, Changyong Wang, Zhihui Rossouw, P. Emile Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios |
author_facet | Malik, Shaima Skrobola, Mike Obamiyi, Samuel Feng, Changyong Wang, Zhihui Rossouw, P. Emile Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios |
author_sort | Malik, Shaima |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and females. Each group was divided equally into 7 chronological age-groups, ranging from 9 to 15 years. Dental age was determined from panoramic radiographs as primary, early mixed, late mixed, or permanent dentition (scored as 1-4). Skeletal age was calculated from hand-wrist radiographs using Fishman's Skeletal Maturation Index (SMI 1-11). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were used to compare skeletal and dental ages among AA, C and H subjects; and AA, C and H subjects in each chronological age-group. The two-sample t-test was used to compare SMI and dental age among females and males. RESULTS: Skeletal and dental age were not significantly different between AA, C and H subjects. Mean SMI was higher in females than males; and there were no significant gender differences regarding dental age. Mean SMI and dental age were significantly different among AA, C and H subjects in the 12-year-old and 11-year-old age groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dental and skeletal maturation are fairly similar among AA, C and H subjects (aged 9 to 15 years). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7749452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77494522020-12-21 A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects Malik, Shaima Skrobola, Mike Obamiyi, Samuel Feng, Changyong Wang, Zhihui Rossouw, P. Emile Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare dental and skeletal ages among African American (AA), Caucasian (C) and Hispanic (H) subjects (chronological ages 9 to 15-years). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 subjects (9 to 15 years old) were equally divided into AA, C, and H groups, with an equal number of males and females. Each group was divided equally into 7 chronological age-groups, ranging from 9 to 15 years. Dental age was determined from panoramic radiographs as primary, early mixed, late mixed, or permanent dentition (scored as 1-4). Skeletal age was calculated from hand-wrist radiographs using Fishman's Skeletal Maturation Index (SMI 1-11). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were used to compare skeletal and dental ages among AA, C and H subjects; and AA, C and H subjects in each chronological age-group. The two-sample t-test was used to compare SMI and dental age among females and males. RESULTS: Skeletal and dental age were not significantly different between AA, C and H subjects. Mean SMI was higher in females than males; and there were no significant gender differences regarding dental age. Mean SMI and dental age were significantly different among AA, C and H subjects in the 12-year-old and 11-year-old age groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dental and skeletal maturation are fairly similar among AA, C and H subjects (aged 9 to 15 years). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7749452/ /pubmed/33354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Malik, Shaima Skrobola, Mike Obamiyi, Samuel Feng, Changyong Wang, Zhihui Rossouw, P. Emile Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title | A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title_full | A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title_fullStr | A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title_short | A retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic subjects |
title_sort | retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal ages between african american, caucasian, and hispanic subjects |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354537 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_2_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikshaima aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT skrobolamike aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT obamiyisamuel aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT fengchangyong aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT wangzhihui aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT rossouwpemile aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT michelogiannakisdimitrios aretrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT malikshaima retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT skrobolamike retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT obamiyisamuel retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT fengchangyong retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT wangzhihui retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT rossouwpemile retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects AT michelogiannakisdimitrios retrospectivecomparisonofdentalandskeletalagesbetweenafricanamericancaucasianandhispanicsubjects |