Cargando…
Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the orthodontic treatment outcome among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study comprised a sample of 80 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (39 males and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354543 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20 |
_version_ | 1783625306842595328 |
---|---|
author | Tintodana, Komil Verma, Sanjeev Singh, Satinder P. Kumar, Vinay Verma, Raj K. Bhupali, Nameksh R. |
author_facet | Tintodana, Komil Verma, Sanjeev Singh, Satinder P. Kumar, Vinay Verma, Raj K. Bhupali, Nameksh R. |
author_sort | Tintodana, Komil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the orthodontic treatment outcome among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study comprised a sample of 80 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (39 males and 41 females) with complete pretreatment and posttreatment orthodontic records. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities. Group 1 (n = 55), nonsurgical (consisted of patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics) and Group 2 (n = 25), surgical (with presurgical orthodontics followed by maxillary advancement orthognathic surgery). PAR score was evaluated on pretreatment and posttreatment study models for both groups. RESULTS: The mean percentage change for the weighted PAR score of Group 1 and Group 2 was 76.79 ± 20.27% and 82.37 ± 11.38%, respectively. Out of the total sample of 80 cases; 62 (77.5%) cases were “greatly improved,” 16 (20%) cases were “improved,” and 2 (2.5%) showed “worse/no improvement.” Nearly 72.5% of cases in Group 1 and 88% in Group 2 were greatly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in PAR score in both groups was satisfactory as more than 70% of the patients were in the greatly improved category. The results of the PAR index revealed a high occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment rendered by the department for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7749457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77494572020-12-21 Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate Tintodana, Komil Verma, Sanjeev Singh, Satinder P. Kumar, Vinay Verma, Raj K. Bhupali, Nameksh R. J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the orthodontic treatment outcome among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study comprised a sample of 80 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (39 males and 41 females) with complete pretreatment and posttreatment orthodontic records. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment modalities. Group 1 (n = 55), nonsurgical (consisted of patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics) and Group 2 (n = 25), surgical (with presurgical orthodontics followed by maxillary advancement orthognathic surgery). PAR score was evaluated on pretreatment and posttreatment study models for both groups. RESULTS: The mean percentage change for the weighted PAR score of Group 1 and Group 2 was 76.79 ± 20.27% and 82.37 ± 11.38%, respectively. Out of the total sample of 80 cases; 62 (77.5%) cases were “greatly improved,” 16 (20%) cases were “improved,” and 2 (2.5%) showed “worse/no improvement.” Nearly 72.5% of cases in Group 1 and 88% in Group 2 were greatly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in PAR score in both groups was satisfactory as more than 70% of the patients were in the greatly improved category. The results of the PAR index revealed a high occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment rendered by the department for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7749457/ /pubmed/33354543 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tintodana, Komil Verma, Sanjeev Singh, Satinder P. Kumar, Vinay Verma, Raj K. Bhupali, Nameksh R. Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title | Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title_full | Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title_fullStr | Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title_short | Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
title_sort | assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using peer assessment rating (par) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33354543 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_4_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tintodanakomil assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate AT vermasanjeev assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate AT singhsatinderp assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate AT kumarvinay assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate AT vermarajk assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate AT bhupalinamekshr assessmentoforthodontictreatmentoutcomeusingpeerassessmentratingparindexamongpatientswithnonsyndromicunilateralcleftlipandpalate |