Cargando…

Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?

Multiple types of stem cells have been proposed for the treatment of spinal cord injury, but their comparative information remains elusive. In this study, a rat model of T10 contusion spinal cord injury was established by the impactor method. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ai-Mei, Chen, Bo-Li, Yu, Ling-Tai, Liu, Tao, Shi, Ling-Ling, Yu, Pan-Pan, Qu, Yi-Bo, So, Kwok-Fai, Zhou, Li-Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32594054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.284997
_version_ 1783625315087548416
author Liu, Ai-Mei
Chen, Bo-Li
Yu, Ling-Tai
Liu, Tao
Shi, Ling-Ling
Yu, Pan-Pan
Qu, Yi-Bo
So, Kwok-Fai
Zhou, Li-Bing
author_facet Liu, Ai-Mei
Chen, Bo-Li
Yu, Ling-Tai
Liu, Tao
Shi, Ling-Ling
Yu, Pan-Pan
Qu, Yi-Bo
So, Kwok-Fai
Zhou, Li-Bing
author_sort Liu, Ai-Mei
collection PubMed
description Multiple types of stem cells have been proposed for the treatment of spinal cord injury, but their comparative information remains elusive. In this study, a rat model of T10 contusion spinal cord injury was established by the impactor method. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) or human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) (2.5 μL/injection site, 1 × 10(5) cells/μL) was injected on rostral and caudal of the injury segment on the ninth day after injury. Rats injected with mesenchymal stem cell culture medium were used as controls. Our results show that although transplanted UCMSCs and ADMSCs failed to differentiate into neurons or glial cells in vivo, both significantly improved motor and sensory function. After spinal cord injury, UCMSCs and ADMSCs similarly promoted spinal neuron survival and axonal regeneration, decreased glial scar and lesion cavity formation, and reduced numbers of active macrophages. Bio-Plex analysis of spinal samples showed a specific increase of interleukin-10 and decrease of tumor necrosis factor α in the ADMSC group, as well as a downregulation of macrophage inflammatory protein 3α in both UCMSC and ADMSC groups at 3 days after cell transplantation. Upregulation of interleukin-10 and interleukin-13 was observed in both UCMSC and ADMSC groups at 7 days after cell transplantation. Isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation proteomics analyses showed that UCMSCs and ADMSCs induced changes of multiple genes related to axonal regeneration, neurotrophy, and cell apoptosis in common and specific manners. In conclusion, UCMSC and ADMSC transplants yielded quite similar contributions to motor and sensory recovery after spinal cord injury via anti-inflammation and improved axonal growth. However, there were some differences in cytokine and gene expression induced by these two types of transplanted cells. Animal experiments were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee at Jinan University (approval No. 20180228026) on February 28, 2018, and the application of human stem cells was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Medical College of Jinan University of China (approval No. 2016041303) on April 13, 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77494922020-12-21 Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury? Liu, Ai-Mei Chen, Bo-Li Yu, Ling-Tai Liu, Tao Shi, Ling-Ling Yu, Pan-Pan Qu, Yi-Bo So, Kwok-Fai Zhou, Li-Bing Neural Regen Res Research Article Multiple types of stem cells have been proposed for the treatment of spinal cord injury, but their comparative information remains elusive. In this study, a rat model of T10 contusion spinal cord injury was established by the impactor method. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) or human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) (2.5 μL/injection site, 1 × 10(5) cells/μL) was injected on rostral and caudal of the injury segment on the ninth day after injury. Rats injected with mesenchymal stem cell culture medium were used as controls. Our results show that although transplanted UCMSCs and ADMSCs failed to differentiate into neurons or glial cells in vivo, both significantly improved motor and sensory function. After spinal cord injury, UCMSCs and ADMSCs similarly promoted spinal neuron survival and axonal regeneration, decreased glial scar and lesion cavity formation, and reduced numbers of active macrophages. Bio-Plex analysis of spinal samples showed a specific increase of interleukin-10 and decrease of tumor necrosis factor α in the ADMSC group, as well as a downregulation of macrophage inflammatory protein 3α in both UCMSC and ADMSC groups at 3 days after cell transplantation. Upregulation of interleukin-10 and interleukin-13 was observed in both UCMSC and ADMSC groups at 7 days after cell transplantation. Isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation proteomics analyses showed that UCMSCs and ADMSCs induced changes of multiple genes related to axonal regeneration, neurotrophy, and cell apoptosis in common and specific manners. In conclusion, UCMSC and ADMSC transplants yielded quite similar contributions to motor and sensory recovery after spinal cord injury via anti-inflammation and improved axonal growth. However, there were some differences in cytokine and gene expression induced by these two types of transplanted cells. Animal experiments were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee at Jinan University (approval No. 20180228026) on February 28, 2018, and the application of human stem cells was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Medical College of Jinan University of China (approval No. 2016041303) on April 13, 2016. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7749492/ /pubmed/32594054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.284997 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Ai-Mei
Chen, Bo-Li
Yu, Ling-Tai
Liu, Tao
Shi, Ling-Ling
Yu, Pan-Pan
Qu, Yi-Bo
So, Kwok-Fai
Zhou, Li-Bing
Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title_full Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title_fullStr Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title_full_unstemmed Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title_short Human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
title_sort human adipose tissue- and umbilical cord-derived stem cells: which is a better alternative to treat spinal cord injury?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32594054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.284997
work_keys_str_mv AT liuaimei humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT chenboli humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT yulingtai humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT liutao humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT shilingling humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT yupanpan humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT quyibo humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT sokwokfai humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury
AT zhoulibing humanadiposetissueandumbilicalcordderivedstemcellswhichisabetteralternativetotreatspinalcordinjury