Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options are limited for patients with bipolar depression. Antidepressants added to mood stabilizers even carry risks of precipitating mixed/manic episodes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a safe and effective option for these patients. METHODS: Database an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldwaser, Eric L., Daddario, Kathy, Aaronson, Scott T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1805
_version_ 1783625318296190976
author Goldwaser, Eric L.
Daddario, Kathy
Aaronson, Scott T.
author_facet Goldwaser, Eric L.
Daddario, Kathy
Aaronson, Scott T.
author_sort Goldwaser, Eric L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Treatment options are limited for patients with bipolar depression. Antidepressants added to mood stabilizers even carry risks of precipitating mixed/manic episodes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a safe and effective option for these patients. METHODS: Database analysis of the TMS Service at Sheppard Pratt Health System identified patients with bipolar disorder type I (BD1) or II (BD2) in a pure depressive phase at initiation of TMS. Records were reviewed for response and remission rates based on MADRS scores, time to effect, and adverse events, notably treatment‐emergent affective switching. All had failed at least two prior treatments for depression, were currently on at least one mood stabilizer and off antidepressants. Stimulation parameters targeted left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: 120% motor threshold, 10 pulses per second (pps) × 4s, intertrain interval (ITI) 26s, 75 trains (37.5 min/session) for 3,000 pps total, 5 sessions/week for 30 total treatments, or until remission criteria were met. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with BD were identified, representing 15% of the total TMS population. 77% of those who completed a course of TMS met response criteria, and 41% of subjects who completed at least 25 treatments met remission criteria. Subjects with BD1 were more likely to respond, remit, or suffer an adverse event than those with BD2. No patient met clinical criteria for a manic/mixed episode, but four (10%) discontinued due to concerns of activation. CONCLUSIONS: TMS is effective in the bipolar depressed population where episode focused intervention can be specifically offered. Risk of psychomotor agitation must be closely monitored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77495112020-12-23 A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation Goldwaser, Eric L. Daddario, Kathy Aaronson, Scott T. Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Treatment options are limited for patients with bipolar depression. Antidepressants added to mood stabilizers even carry risks of precipitating mixed/manic episodes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a safe and effective option for these patients. METHODS: Database analysis of the TMS Service at Sheppard Pratt Health System identified patients with bipolar disorder type I (BD1) or II (BD2) in a pure depressive phase at initiation of TMS. Records were reviewed for response and remission rates based on MADRS scores, time to effect, and adverse events, notably treatment‐emergent affective switching. All had failed at least two prior treatments for depression, were currently on at least one mood stabilizer and off antidepressants. Stimulation parameters targeted left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: 120% motor threshold, 10 pulses per second (pps) × 4s, intertrain interval (ITI) 26s, 75 trains (37.5 min/session) for 3,000 pps total, 5 sessions/week for 30 total treatments, or until remission criteria were met. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with BD were identified, representing 15% of the total TMS population. 77% of those who completed a course of TMS met response criteria, and 41% of subjects who completed at least 25 treatments met remission criteria. Subjects with BD1 were more likely to respond, remit, or suffer an adverse event than those with BD2. No patient met clinical criteria for a manic/mixed episode, but four (10%) discontinued due to concerns of activation. CONCLUSIONS: TMS is effective in the bipolar depressed population where episode focused intervention can be specifically offered. Risk of psychomotor agitation must be closely monitored. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7749511/ /pubmed/33169946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1805 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Goldwaser, Eric L.
Daddario, Kathy
Aaronson, Scott T.
A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_short A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_sort retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1805
work_keys_str_mv AT goldwaserericl aretrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT daddariokathy aretrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT aaronsonscottt aretrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT goldwaserericl retrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT daddariokathy retrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT aaronsonscottt retrospectiveanalysisofbipolardepressiontreatedwithtranscranialmagneticstimulation