Cargando…
Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier
INTRODUCTION: Prior Go/NoGo studies have localized specific regions and EEG spectra for which traditional approaches have distinguished between Go and NoGo conditions. A more detailed characterization of the spatial distribution and timing of the synchronization of frequency bands would contribute s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1902 |
_version_ | 1783625318756515840 |
---|---|
author | DeLaRosa, Bambi L. Spence, Jeffrey S. Motes, Michael A. To, Wing Vanneste, Sven Kraut, Michael A. Hart, John |
author_facet | DeLaRosa, Bambi L. Spence, Jeffrey S. Motes, Michael A. To, Wing Vanneste, Sven Kraut, Michael A. Hart, John |
author_sort | DeLaRosa, Bambi L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prior Go/NoGo studies have localized specific regions and EEG spectra for which traditional approaches have distinguished between Go and NoGo conditions. A more detailed characterization of the spatial distribution and timing of the synchronization of frequency bands would contribute substantially to the clarification of neural mechanisms that underlie performance of the Go/NoGo task. METHODS: The present study used a machine learning approach to learn the features that distinguish between ERSPs involved in selection and inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. A single‐layer neural network classifier was used to predict task conditions for each subject to characterize ERSPs associated with Go versus NoGo trials. RESULTS: The final classifier accurately identified individual task conditions at an overall rate of 92%, estimated by fivefold cross‐validation. The detailed accounting of EEG time–frequency patterns localized to brain regions (i.e., thalamus, pre‐SMA, orbitofrontal cortex, and superior parietal cortex) corroborates and also elaborates upon previous findings from fMRI and EEG studies, and expands the information about EEG power changes in multiple frequency bands (i.e., primarily theta power increase, alpha decreases, and beta increases and decreases) within these regions underlying the selection and inhibition processes engaged in the Go and NoGo trials. CONCLUSION: This time–frequency‐based classifier extends previous spatiotemporal findings and provides information about neural mechanisms underlying selection and inhibition processes engaged in Go and NoGo trials, respectively. This neural network classifier can be used to assess time–frequency patterns from an individual subject and thus may offer insight into therapeutic uses of neuromodulation in neural dysfunction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7749513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77495132020-12-23 Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier DeLaRosa, Bambi L. Spence, Jeffrey S. Motes, Michael A. To, Wing Vanneste, Sven Kraut, Michael A. Hart, John Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Prior Go/NoGo studies have localized specific regions and EEG spectra for which traditional approaches have distinguished between Go and NoGo conditions. A more detailed characterization of the spatial distribution and timing of the synchronization of frequency bands would contribute substantially to the clarification of neural mechanisms that underlie performance of the Go/NoGo task. METHODS: The present study used a machine learning approach to learn the features that distinguish between ERSPs involved in selection and inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. A single‐layer neural network classifier was used to predict task conditions for each subject to characterize ERSPs associated with Go versus NoGo trials. RESULTS: The final classifier accurately identified individual task conditions at an overall rate of 92%, estimated by fivefold cross‐validation. The detailed accounting of EEG time–frequency patterns localized to brain regions (i.e., thalamus, pre‐SMA, orbitofrontal cortex, and superior parietal cortex) corroborates and also elaborates upon previous findings from fMRI and EEG studies, and expands the information about EEG power changes in multiple frequency bands (i.e., primarily theta power increase, alpha decreases, and beta increases and decreases) within these regions underlying the selection and inhibition processes engaged in the Go and NoGo trials. CONCLUSION: This time–frequency‐based classifier extends previous spatiotemporal findings and provides information about neural mechanisms underlying selection and inhibition processes engaged in Go and NoGo trials, respectively. This neural network classifier can be used to assess time–frequency patterns from an individual subject and thus may offer insight into therapeutic uses of neuromodulation in neural dysfunction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7749513/ /pubmed/33078586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1902 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research DeLaRosa, Bambi L. Spence, Jeffrey S. Motes, Michael A. To, Wing Vanneste, Sven Kraut, Michael A. Hart, John Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title | Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title_full | Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title_fullStr | Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title_short | Identification of selection and inhibition components in a Go/NoGo task from EEG spectra using a machine learning classifier |
title_sort | identification of selection and inhibition components in a go/nogo task from eeg spectra using a machine learning classifier |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delarosabambil identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT spencejeffreys identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT motesmichaela identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT towing identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT vannestesven identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT krautmichaela identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier AT hartjohn identificationofselectionandinhibitioncomponentsinagonogotaskfromeegspectrausingamachinelearningclassifier |