Cargando…

Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borkar, Amol, Shah, Amit, Gudi, Anil, Homburg, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349803
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962
_version_ 1783625397678637056
author Borkar, Amol
Shah, Amit
Gudi, Anil
Homburg, Roy
author_facet Borkar, Amol
Shah, Amit
Gudi, Anil
Homburg, Roy
author_sort Borkar, Amol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7749976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77499762020-12-20 Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial Borkar, Amol Shah, Amit Gudi, Anil Homburg, Roy Int J Reprod Biomed Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer. Knowledge E 2020-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7749976/ /pubmed/33349803 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 Text en Copyright © 2020 Borkar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borkar, Amol
Shah, Amit
Gudi, Anil
Homburg, Roy
Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title_full Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title_fullStr Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title_short Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
title_sort outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first ivf cycle: a randomized control trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349803
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962
work_keys_str_mv AT borkaramol outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial
AT shahamit outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial
AT gudianil outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial
AT homburgroy outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial