Cargando…
Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Knowledge E
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349803 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 |
_version_ | 1783625397678637056 |
---|---|
author | Borkar, Amol Shah, Amit Gudi, Anil Homburg, Roy |
author_facet | Borkar, Amol Shah, Amit Gudi, Anil Homburg, Roy |
author_sort | Borkar, Amol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7749976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Knowledge E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77499762020-12-20 Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial Borkar, Amol Shah, Amit Gudi, Anil Homburg, Roy Int J Reprod Biomed Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer. Knowledge E 2020-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7749976/ /pubmed/33349803 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 Text en Copyright © 2020 Borkar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Borkar, Amol Shah, Amit Gudi, Anil Homburg, Roy Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title | Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title_full | Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title_short | Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial |
title_sort | outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first ivf cycle: a randomized control trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7749976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349803 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borkaramol outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial AT shahamit outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial AT gudianil outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial AT homburgroy outcomeofmockembryotransferbeforethefirstivfcyclearandomizedcontroltrial |