Cargando…
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. METHODS: We held 55 individual intervie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y |
_version_ | 1783625403844263936 |
---|---|
author | Ladds, Emma Rushforth, Alex Wieringa, Sietse Taylor, Sharon Rayner, Clare Husain, Laiba Greenhalgh, Trisha |
author_facet | Ladds, Emma Rushforth, Alex Wieringa, Sietse Taylor, Sharon Rayner, Clare Husain, Laiba Greenhalgh, Trisha |
author_sort | Ladds, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. METHODS: We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. RESULTS: Of 114 participants aged 27–73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services. CONCLUSION: Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04435041. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7750006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77500062020-12-21 Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services Ladds, Emma Rushforth, Alex Wieringa, Sietse Taylor, Sharon Rayner, Clare Husain, Laiba Greenhalgh, Trisha BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3–4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document such patients’ lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. METHODS: We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. RESULTS: Of 114 participants aged 27–73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services. CONCLUSION: Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04435041. BioMed Central 2020-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7750006/ /pubmed/33342437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ladds, Emma Rushforth, Alex Wieringa, Sietse Taylor, Sharon Rayner, Clare Husain, Laiba Greenhalgh, Trisha Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_full | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_fullStr | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_full_unstemmed | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_short | Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
title_sort | persistent symptoms after covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long covid” patients and draft quality principles for services |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33342437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laddsemma persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT rushforthalex persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT wieringasietse persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT taylorsharon persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT raynerclare persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT husainlaiba persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices AT greenhalghtrisha persistentsymptomsaftercovid19qualitativestudyof114longcovidpatientsanddraftqualityprinciplesforservices |