Cargando…

Masticatory muscle tendon-aponeurosis hyperplasia diagnosed as temporomandibular joint disorder: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION: Masticatory muscle tendon-aponeurosis hyperplasia (MMTAH) is a new clinical entity that presents mainly with trismus due to hyperplasia of the masseter aponeurosis and temporalis muscle tendon. However, the etiological factors of this disease are unknown; it is often mistreated as temp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsayed, Nagwan, Shimo, Tsuyoshi, Harada, Fumiya, Takeda, Shigehiro, Hiraki, Daichi, Abiko, Yoshihiro, Nakayama, Eiji, Nagayasu, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.150
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Masticatory muscle tendon-aponeurosis hyperplasia (MMTAH) is a new clinical entity that presents mainly with trismus due to hyperplasia of the masseter aponeurosis and temporalis muscle tendon. However, the etiological factors of this disease are unknown; it is often mistreated as temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD). PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 32-year-old female patient complaining of bilateral pain in her jaw and difficulty opening her mouth. She was first diagnosed as TMD and treated with a splint; however, her symptoms did not improve. Clinical examination revealed a square mandible, tenderness in the left and right temporalis muscles and masseter muscles, and tenderness along the anterior border of the masseter muscle. Her maximum mouth-opening was 30 mm. Short TI inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging showed areas of low intensity at the anterior border of the masseter muscle and around the coronoid process where the temporalis muscle tendon attaches. Consequently, the diagnosis made based on the clinical and radiographic findings was MMTAH. Bilateral coronoidectomy was performed, followed by a rehabilitation program for six months. The maximum opening was maintained at 48 mm two years after the operation. DISCUSSION: MMTAH was treated as type 1 TMD until it was recognized as a new disease at the conference for the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Since then, many clinicians have become aware of this particular condition, and different treatment modalities have been proposed. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider MMTAH as a differential diagnosis when the patient’s chief complaint is gradually decreasing mouth-opening.