Cargando…

Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa

The US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Jaehyung, Mikhaylov, Alexey, Richter, Ulf H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05693
_version_ 1783625469755654144
author An, Jaehyung
Mikhaylov, Alexey
Richter, Ulf H.
author_facet An, Jaehyung
Mikhaylov, Alexey
Richter, Ulf H.
author_sort An, Jaehyung
collection PubMed
description The US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures to US-China trade. Moreover, this paper fills the gap in literature about deglobalization in Energy and Resources Sectors in Africa. This paper proves the idea that US companies that are more dependent on exports and imports from China have lower stock and bond returns, and, at the same time, higher default risks in the short time aspect. The article found Trade War effects in energy and resources companies in Africa in the last years: on ownership rank, on credit country rank, on default risks and on their profitability. The paper also demonstrates that companies’ indirect exposure to US-China trade through domestic input-output links affects their responses to news on the subject matter. These findings suggest that the state of US-China trade of energy and resources is much more complex than the simplistic view of global trade that was in the beginning of Trade War with China. As a result of the Trade War, the real changes in stock prices of China companies (-0.07%) in energy and resource sectors is less than the same changes in US companies in Africa (-0.32%) in 2019. Also, the probability of default of Chinese companies (average default probability changed in -0.08%) in energy and resource sectors changed less than the same rank of US companies in Africa (average default probability changed by -0.84%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7750368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77503682020-12-23 Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa An, Jaehyung Mikhaylov, Alexey Richter, Ulf H. Heliyon Research Article The US government proposes to impose tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese imports leading to significant concerns over the Trade War between the US and China. The article evaluates and examines the market responses of companies in both countries, depending on their direct and indirect exposures to US-China trade. Moreover, this paper fills the gap in literature about deglobalization in Energy and Resources Sectors in Africa. This paper proves the idea that US companies that are more dependent on exports and imports from China have lower stock and bond returns, and, at the same time, higher default risks in the short time aspect. The article found Trade War effects in energy and resources companies in Africa in the last years: on ownership rank, on credit country rank, on default risks and on their profitability. The paper also demonstrates that companies’ indirect exposure to US-China trade through domestic input-output links affects their responses to news on the subject matter. These findings suggest that the state of US-China trade of energy and resources is much more complex than the simplistic view of global trade that was in the beginning of Trade War with China. As a result of the Trade War, the real changes in stock prices of China companies (-0.07%) in energy and resource sectors is less than the same changes in US companies in Africa (-0.32%) in 2019. Also, the probability of default of Chinese companies (average default probability changed in -0.08%) in energy and resource sectors changed less than the same rank of US companies in Africa (average default probability changed by -0.84%). Elsevier 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7750368/ /pubmed/33364483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05693 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Jaehyung
Mikhaylov, Alexey
Richter, Ulf H.
Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_full Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_fullStr Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_short Trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in Africa
title_sort trade war effects: evidence from sectors of energy and resources in africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05693
work_keys_str_mv AT anjaehyung tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica
AT mikhaylovalexey tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica
AT richterulfh tradewareffectsevidencefromsectorsofenergyandresourcesinafrica