Cargando…
Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine
Using quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM), studies can investigate clinically relevant microstructural changes with high reliability over time and across subjects and sites. However, long acquisition times (20 min for the standard 1-mm isotropic protocol) limit its translational potential. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 |
_version_ | 1783625494917283840 |
---|---|
author | Cooper, Graham Hirsch, Sebastian Scheel, Michael Brandt, Alexander U. Paul, Friedemann Finke, Carsten Boehm-Sturm, Philipp Hetzer, Stefan |
author_facet | Cooper, Graham Hirsch, Sebastian Scheel, Michael Brandt, Alexander U. Paul, Friedemann Finke, Carsten Boehm-Sturm, Philipp Hetzer, Stefan |
author_sort | Cooper, Graham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM), studies can investigate clinically relevant microstructural changes with high reliability over time and across subjects and sites. However, long acquisition times (20 min for the standard 1-mm isotropic protocol) limit its translational potential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity gain of a fast 1.6-mm isotropic MPM protocol including post-processing optimized for longitudinal clinical studies. 6 healthy volunteers (35±7 years old; 3 female) were scanned at 3T to acquire the following whole-brain MPM maps with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution: proton density (PD), magnetization transfer saturation (MT), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2(*)). MPM maps were generated using two RF transmit field (B1+) correction methods: (1) using an acquired B1+ map and (2) using a data-driven approach. Maps were generated with and without Gibb's ringing correction. The intra-/inter-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) of all maps in the gray and white matter, as well as in all anatomical regions of a fine-grained brain atlas, were compared between the different post-processing methods using Student's t-test. The intra-subject stability of the 1.6-mm MPM protocol is 2–3 times higher than for the standard 1-mm sequence and can be achieved in less than half the scan duration. Intra-subject variability for all four maps in white matter ranged from 1.2–5.3% and in gray matter from 1.8 to 9.2%. Bias-field correction using an acquired B1+ map significantly improved intra-subject variability of PD and R1 in the gray (42%) and white matter (54%) and correcting the raw images for the effect of Gibb's ringing further improved intra-subject variability in all maps in the gray (11%) and white matter (10%). Combining Gibb's ringing correction and bias field correction using acquired B1+ maps provides excellent stability of the 7-min MPM sequence with 1.6 mm resolution suitable for the clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7750476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77504762020-12-22 Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine Cooper, Graham Hirsch, Sebastian Scheel, Michael Brandt, Alexander U. Paul, Friedemann Finke, Carsten Boehm-Sturm, Philipp Hetzer, Stefan Front Neurosci Neuroscience Using quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM), studies can investigate clinically relevant microstructural changes with high reliability over time and across subjects and sites. However, long acquisition times (20 min for the standard 1-mm isotropic protocol) limit its translational potential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity gain of a fast 1.6-mm isotropic MPM protocol including post-processing optimized for longitudinal clinical studies. 6 healthy volunteers (35±7 years old; 3 female) were scanned at 3T to acquire the following whole-brain MPM maps with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution: proton density (PD), magnetization transfer saturation (MT), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2(*)). MPM maps were generated using two RF transmit field (B1+) correction methods: (1) using an acquired B1+ map and (2) using a data-driven approach. Maps were generated with and without Gibb's ringing correction. The intra-/inter-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) of all maps in the gray and white matter, as well as in all anatomical regions of a fine-grained brain atlas, were compared between the different post-processing methods using Student's t-test. The intra-subject stability of the 1.6-mm MPM protocol is 2–3 times higher than for the standard 1-mm sequence and can be achieved in less than half the scan duration. Intra-subject variability for all four maps in white matter ranged from 1.2–5.3% and in gray matter from 1.8 to 9.2%. Bias-field correction using an acquired B1+ map significantly improved intra-subject variability of PD and R1 in the gray (42%) and white matter (54%) and correcting the raw images for the effect of Gibb's ringing further improved intra-subject variability in all maps in the gray (11%) and white matter (10%). Combining Gibb's ringing correction and bias field correction using acquired B1+ maps provides excellent stability of the 7-min MPM sequence with 1.6 mm resolution suitable for the clinical routine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7750476/ /pubmed/33364921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 Text en Copyright © 2020 Cooper, Hirsch, Scheel, Brandt, Paul, Finke, Boehm-Sturm and Hetzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Cooper, Graham Hirsch, Sebastian Scheel, Michael Brandt, Alexander U. Paul, Friedemann Finke, Carsten Boehm-Sturm, Philipp Hetzer, Stefan Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title | Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title_full | Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title_short | Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine |
title_sort | quantitative multi-parameter mapping optimized for the clinical routine |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364921 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.611194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coopergraham quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT hirschsebastian quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT scheelmichael quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT brandtalexanderu quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT paulfriedemann quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT finkecarsten quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT boehmsturmphilipp quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine AT hetzerstefan quantitativemultiparametermappingoptimizedfortheclinicalroutine |