Cargando…

Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy for patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) progressing after first or subsequent-line therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 67 patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Ting, Zhang, Qun, Jin, Qi-Feng, Hua, Yong-Hong, Chen, Xiao-Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33341487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100989
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) progressing after first or subsequent-line therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 67 patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma from our hospital were included. All patients were sorted into two arms: anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm and anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm. We retrospectively estimated objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients of both arms. Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier methodology were used to analyze. RESULTS: From September 2018 to March 2020, this research included 67 patients. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm, partial response and stable disease were observed in fourteen and 11 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 53.8%. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm, complete response and partial response were observed in one and 5 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 14.6%. The incidence of hyperprogressive disease was higher in the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor group compared with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy group (39.0% vs 3.8%, p<0.05). Univariable analyses discovered that 6-month PFS and OS benefits were observed for anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm compared to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm (65.4% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.001; 100.0% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: In present study, we revealed that adding chemotherapy to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor significantly improved 6-month PFS and OS for patients with R/M NPC progressing after first-line therapy. It warrants further study.