Cargando…

Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Objective: Coil embolization of aortic side branches has been additionally performed to prevent type II endoleak during EVAR in our institute. In this study, we evaluated the predictive factors of the possibility for coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoki, Atsushi, Maruta, Kazuto, Hosaka, Norifumi, Masuda, Tomoaki, Omoto, Tadashi, Horikawa, Yui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00115
_version_ 1783625602905931776
author Aoki, Atsushi
Maruta, Kazuto
Hosaka, Norifumi
Masuda, Tomoaki
Omoto, Tadashi
Horikawa, Yui
author_facet Aoki, Atsushi
Maruta, Kazuto
Hosaka, Norifumi
Masuda, Tomoaki
Omoto, Tadashi
Horikawa, Yui
author_sort Aoki, Atsushi
collection PubMed
description Objective: Coil embolization of aortic side branches has been additionally performed to prevent type II endoleak during EVAR in our institute. In this study, we evaluated the predictive factors of the possibility for coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) during EVAR. Methods: Seventy-four EVAR patients during June 2015 and April 2019 were included in the study. The coil embolization procedural time for one vessel is limited to 10 min. Aortic side branches were selected with 4 Fr Shepherd hook type catheter (Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) and were embolized with Interlock (Boston Scientific, MA, USA) via microcatheter. As predictive factors, internal diameter of aortic side branches and the aortic diameter perpendicular to the origin of LA (aortic diameter) were evaluated. Results: Coil embolization was tried for 52 patent IMAs and all IMAs except two IMAs with ostial stenosis were successfully coil embolized (96.2%). Totally 190 LAs were patent and coil embolization was tried for 144 LAs. Among 144 LAs, 106 LAs (73.6%) were successfully coil embolized and the diameter was significantly longer (2.30±0.51 mm vs. 2.04±0.41 mm, p=0.007) and aortic dimeter was significantly shorter (30.0±8.1 mm vs. 40.5±11.6 mm, p<0.001) in successfully embolized LAs. Cut off value of successful LA coil embolization was 2.06 mm for internal diameter and 36.1 mm for aortic diameter by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Successful coil embolization rate for LAs with internal diameter longer than 2.0 mm and aortic diameter less than 36.2 mm was 90% (72 among 80 LAs). Conclusion: Coil embolization during EVAR for IMA was highly successful, if there was no calcified ostial stenosis. LA embolization was feasible especially for LAs with internal diameter ≥2.0 mm and aortic diameter ≤36.1 mm. This information would be useful to select the target vessel for aortic side branches coil embolization during EVAR. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 389–396.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7751085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77510852020-12-30 Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Aoki, Atsushi Maruta, Kazuto Hosaka, Norifumi Masuda, Tomoaki Omoto, Tadashi Horikawa, Yui Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objective: Coil embolization of aortic side branches has been additionally performed to prevent type II endoleak during EVAR in our institute. In this study, we evaluated the predictive factors of the possibility for coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar artery (LA) during EVAR. Methods: Seventy-four EVAR patients during June 2015 and April 2019 were included in the study. The coil embolization procedural time for one vessel is limited to 10 min. Aortic side branches were selected with 4 Fr Shepherd hook type catheter (Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) and were embolized with Interlock (Boston Scientific, MA, USA) via microcatheter. As predictive factors, internal diameter of aortic side branches and the aortic diameter perpendicular to the origin of LA (aortic diameter) were evaluated. Results: Coil embolization was tried for 52 patent IMAs and all IMAs except two IMAs with ostial stenosis were successfully coil embolized (96.2%). Totally 190 LAs were patent and coil embolization was tried for 144 LAs. Among 144 LAs, 106 LAs (73.6%) were successfully coil embolized and the diameter was significantly longer (2.30±0.51 mm vs. 2.04±0.41 mm, p=0.007) and aortic dimeter was significantly shorter (30.0±8.1 mm vs. 40.5±11.6 mm, p<0.001) in successfully embolized LAs. Cut off value of successful LA coil embolization was 2.06 mm for internal diameter and 36.1 mm for aortic diameter by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Successful coil embolization rate for LAs with internal diameter longer than 2.0 mm and aortic diameter less than 36.2 mm was 90% (72 among 80 LAs). Conclusion: Coil embolization during EVAR for IMA was highly successful, if there was no calcified ostial stenosis. LA embolization was feasible especially for LAs with internal diameter ≥2.0 mm and aortic diameter ≤36.1 mm. This information would be useful to select the target vessel for aortic side branches coil embolization during EVAR. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 389–396.) Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2020-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7751085/ /pubmed/33384725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00115 Text en © 2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aoki, Atsushi
Maruta, Kazuto
Hosaka, Norifumi
Masuda, Tomoaki
Omoto, Tadashi
Horikawa, Yui
Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title_full Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title_fullStr Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title_short Predictive Factor of the Possibility for Aortic Side Branches Coil Embolization during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
title_sort predictive factor of the possibility for aortic side branches coil embolization during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00115
work_keys_str_mv AT aokiatsushi predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair
AT marutakazuto predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair
AT hosakanorifumi predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair
AT masudatomoaki predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair
AT omototadashi predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair
AT horikawayui predictivefactorofthepossibilityforaorticsidebranchescoilembolizationduringendovascularabdominalaorticaneurysmrepair