Cargando…
Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621 |
_version_ | 1783625623296540672 |
---|---|
author | Manley, James Balarajan, Yarlini Malm, Shahira Harman, Luke Owens, Jessica Murthy, Sheila Stewart, David Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena Khurshid, Atif |
author_facet | Manley, James Balarajan, Yarlini Malm, Shahira Harman, Luke Owens, Jessica Murthy, Sheila Stewart, David Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena Khurshid, Atif |
author_sort | Manley, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants. METHODS: We searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes. RESULTS: Out of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI −3.5% to −0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (−2.7%, 95% CI −5.4% to −0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: −0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: We found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7751217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77512172020-12-29 Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Manley, James Balarajan, Yarlini Malm, Shahira Harman, Luke Owens, Jessica Murthy, Sheila Stewart, David Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena Khurshid, Atif BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants. METHODS: We searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes. RESULTS: Out of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI −3.5% to −0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (−2.7%, 95% CI −5.4% to −0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: −0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: We found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7751217/ /pubmed/33355262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Manley, James Balarajan, Yarlini Malm, Shahira Harman, Luke Owens, Jessica Murthy, Sheila Stewart, David Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena Khurshid, Atif Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manleyjames cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT balarajanyarlini cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malmshahira cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT harmanluke cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT owensjessica cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murthysheila cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stewartdavid cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT winderrossinataliaelena cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khurshidatif cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |