Cargando…

Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manley, James, Balarajan, Yarlini, Malm, Shahira, Harman, Luke, Owens, Jessica, Murthy, Sheila, Stewart, David, Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena, Khurshid, Atif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621
_version_ 1783625623296540672
author Manley, James
Balarajan, Yarlini
Malm, Shahira
Harman, Luke
Owens, Jessica
Murthy, Sheila
Stewart, David
Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena
Khurshid, Atif
author_facet Manley, James
Balarajan, Yarlini
Malm, Shahira
Harman, Luke
Owens, Jessica
Murthy, Sheila
Stewart, David
Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena
Khurshid, Atif
author_sort Manley, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants. METHODS: We searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes. RESULTS: Out of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI −3.5% to −0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (−2.7%, 95% CI −5.4% to −0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: −0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: We found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7751217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77512172020-12-29 Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Manley, James Balarajan, Yarlini Malm, Shahira Harman, Luke Owens, Jessica Murthy, Sheila Stewart, David Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena Khurshid, Atif BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Cash transfer (CT) programmes are implemented widely to alleviate poverty and provide safety nets to vulnerable households with children. However, evidence on the effects of CTs on child health and nutrition outcomes has been mixed. We systematically reviewed evidence of the impact of CTs on child nutritional status and selected proximate determinants. METHODS: We searched articles published between January 1997 and September 2018 using Agris, Econlit, Eldis, IBSS, IDEAS, IFPRI, Google Scholar, PubMed and World Bank databases. We included studies using quantitative impact evaluation methods of CTs with sample sizes over 300, targeted to households with children under 5 years old conducted in countries with gross domestic product per capita below US$10 000 at baseline. We conducted meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess the impact of CT programmes on selected child nutrition outcomes and meta-regression analysis to examine the association of programme characteristics with effect sizes. RESULTS: Out of 2862 articles identified, 74 articles were eligible for inclusion. We find that CTs have significant effects of 0.03±0.03 on height-for-age z-scores (p<0.03) and a decrease of 2.1% in stunting (95% CI −3.5% to −0.7%); consumption of animal-source foods (4.5%, 95% CI 2.9% to 6.0%); dietary diversity (0.73, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19) and diarrhoea incidence (−2.7%, 95% CI −5.4% to −0.0%; p<0.05). The effects of CTs on weight-for-age z-scores and wasting were not significant (0.02, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.08; p<0.42) and (1.2%, 95% CI: −0.1% to 2.5%; p<0.07), respectively. We found that specific programme characteristics differentially modified the effect on the nutrition outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: We found that CT programmes targeted to households with young children improved linear growth and contributed to reduced stunting. We found that the likely pathways were through increased dietary diversity, including through the increased consumption of animal-source foods and reduced incidence of diarrhoea. With heightened interest in nutrition-responsive social protection programmes to improve child nutrition, we make recommendations to inform the design and implementation of future programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7751217/ /pubmed/33355262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Manley, James
Balarajan, Yarlini
Malm, Shahira
Harman, Luke
Owens, Jessica
Murthy, Sheila
Stewart, David
Winder-Rossi, Natalia Elena
Khurshid, Atif
Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort cash transfers and child nutritional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003621
work_keys_str_mv AT manleyjames cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT balarajanyarlini cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malmshahira cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harmanluke cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT owensjessica cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT murthysheila cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stewartdavid cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT winderrossinataliaelena cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khurshidatif cashtransfersandchildnutritionaloutcomesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis