Cargando…

Asymmetric Thickness Intracorneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus

PURPOSE: To describe the anatomical and functional results of the implantation of asymmetric thickness intracorneal ring segments (AS-ICRS) in eyes with keratoconus and asymmetric/irregular astigmatism (type 2 – Duck – and type 3 – Snowman – phenotypes, Fernandez-Vega/Alfonso morphologic Keratoconus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baptista, Pedro Manuel, Marques, João Heitor, Neves, Miguel Mesquita, Gomes, Miguel, Oliveira, Luís
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364746
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S283387
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To describe the anatomical and functional results of the implantation of asymmetric thickness intracorneal ring segments (AS-ICRS) in eyes with keratoconus and asymmetric/irregular astigmatism (type 2 – Duck – and type 3 – Snowman – phenotypes, Fernandez-Vega/Alfonso morphologic Keratoconus classification). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study including 19 consecutive patients (21 eyes) with keratoconus who underwent manual implantation of the Keraring(®) Asymmetric ICRS (AS). Analysis included demographic and clinical data and Pentacam (Oculus(®)) measurements: topographic astigmatism; topographic flat meridian (K1), steepest meridian (K2) and the maximum keratometric point (Kmax); total root mean square (RMS) and high order RMS (HOA) aberrations and comatic Zernike coefficients (Z3(1);Z3(−1)) at 0º and 90º meridians. RESULTS: Overall mean age was 35.3±11.7 years and median follow-up was 7.1 months (range 6–12). At the end of follow-up, a significant improvement from baseline was achieved in both UDVA (0.24±0.22; p=0.017) and CDVA (0.21±0.17; p<0.001). Regarding topographic measurements, the greatest decrease was observed in K2 (2.76±1.9D; p<0.001) and astigmatism (1.97±1.5; p<0.001). Aberrometry analysis showed a reduction of 1.27±3.2µm in the total RMS (p=0.085), 0.24±0.9µm in HOA (p=0.227) and 0.78±0.5 (p<0.001) in the 90º component of comatic aberration. The procedure effects in the CDVA, topographic and aberrometric parameters were higher in type 2 cones without statistical significance (p>0.05 in all). CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Keraring(®) Asymmetric ICRS in keratoconus with asymmetric/irregular astigmatism allowed an improvement of several clinical, topographic and aberrometric parameters, with clinical efficacy and safety, with a tendency to a greater effect in the type 2 cones.