Cargando…

Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives

When people answer the question “How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?”, they usually respond with “two,” although Moses does not appear in the biblical story of the Ark. We investigated this “Moses illusion” in a multiple-choice format and tested the influence of monetary incenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speckmann, Felix, Unkelbach, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z
_version_ 1783625718949740544
author Speckmann, Felix
Unkelbach, Christian
author_facet Speckmann, Felix
Unkelbach, Christian
author_sort Speckmann, Felix
collection PubMed
description When people answer the question “How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?”, they usually respond with “two,” although Moses does not appear in the biblical story of the Ark. We investigated this “Moses illusion” in a multiple-choice format and tested the influence of monetary incentives on the illusion’s strength. Thereby, we addressed the role of a cooperative communication context for the illusion’s emergence, as well as the role of participants’ motivation. In four experiments (total N = 914), we found that the Moses illusion persists in a multiple-choice format. As the multiple-choice format realizes a cooperative context in which the correct answer is always available, we exclude a cooperative context explanation for the illusion. Monetary incentives reduced the strength of the illusion. However, the reduction was numerically and statistically small. We thereby show that the illusion is not due to violations of cooperative communications, and not due to a lack of motivation. The multiple-choice approach will facilitate further research on the Moses illusion and the data provide additional evidence for the Moses illusion’s empirical robustness and constrain its theoretical explanations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7751745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77517452020-12-22 Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives Speckmann, Felix Unkelbach, Christian Mem Cognit Article When people answer the question “How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?”, they usually respond with “two,” although Moses does not appear in the biblical story of the Ark. We investigated this “Moses illusion” in a multiple-choice format and tested the influence of monetary incentives on the illusion’s strength. Thereby, we addressed the role of a cooperative communication context for the illusion’s emergence, as well as the role of participants’ motivation. In four experiments (total N = 914), we found that the Moses illusion persists in a multiple-choice format. As the multiple-choice format realizes a cooperative context in which the correct answer is always available, we exclude a cooperative context explanation for the illusion. Monetary incentives reduced the strength of the illusion. However, the reduction was numerically and statistically small. We thereby show that the illusion is not due to violations of cooperative communications, and not due to a lack of motivation. The multiple-choice approach will facilitate further research on the Moses illusion and the data provide additional evidence for the Moses illusion’s empirical robustness and constrain its theoretical explanations. Springer US 2020-12-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7751745/ /pubmed/33349898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Speckmann, Felix
Unkelbach, Christian
Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title_full Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title_fullStr Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title_full_unstemmed Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title_short Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
title_sort moses, money, and multiple-choice: the moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z
work_keys_str_mv AT speckmannfelix mosesmoneyandmultiplechoicethemosesillusioninamultiplechoiceformatwithhighincentives
AT unkelbachchristian mosesmoneyandmultiplechoicethemosesillusioninamultiplechoiceformatwithhighincentives