Cargando…

Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of health professional graduates transitioning into the workforce. This study evaluated changes in these EBP domains in physiotherapists after one year of working. METHOD: A mixed methods design w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McEvoy, Maureen, Luker, Julie, Fryer, Caroline, Lewis, Lucy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33347468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244190
_version_ 1783625758635196416
author McEvoy, Maureen
Luker, Julie
Fryer, Caroline
Lewis, Lucy K
author_facet McEvoy, Maureen
Luker, Julie
Fryer, Caroline
Lewis, Lucy K
author_sort McEvoy, Maureen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of health professional graduates transitioning into the workforce. This study evaluated changes in these EBP domains in physiotherapists after one year of working. METHOD: A mixed methods design was used. Participants completed two psychometrically-tested EBP questionnaires at two timepoints. The Evidence-Based Practice Profile questionnaire collected self-report EBP data (Terminology, Relevance, Confidence, Practice, Sympathy) and the Knowledge of Research Evidence Competencies collected objective data (Actual Knowledge). Changes were calculated using descriptive statistics (paired t-tests, 95% CI, effect sizes). Qualitative interview data collected at one timepoint were analysed using a descriptive approach and thematic analysis, to examine the lived experience of participants in the context of their first employment. The aim of the mixed methods approach was a broader and deeper understanding of participants’ first year of employment and using EBP. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 50 participants who completed both questionnaires at the two timepoints. After one year in the workforce, there was a significant decrease in participants’ perceptions of Relevance (p<0.001) and Confidence with EBP (p<0.001) and non-significant decreases in the other domains. Effect sizes showed medium decreases for Relevance (0.69) and Confidence (0.57), small decreases in Terminology (0.28) and Practice (0.23), and very small decreases in Sympathy (0.08) and Actual Knowledge (0.11). Seven themes described participants experience of using EBP in their first working year. CONCLUSIONS: After a year in the workplace, confidence and perceptions of relevance of EBP were significantly reduced. A subtle interplay of features related to workplace culture, competing demands to develop clinical skills, internal and external motivators to use EBP and patient expectations, together with availability of resources and time, may impact early graduates’ perceptions of EBP. Workplace role models who immersed themselves in evidence discussion and experience were inspiring to early graduates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7751960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77519602021-01-05 Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study McEvoy, Maureen Luker, Julie Fryer, Caroline Lewis, Lucy K PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored evidence-based practice (EBP) knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of health professional graduates transitioning into the workforce. This study evaluated changes in these EBP domains in physiotherapists after one year of working. METHOD: A mixed methods design was used. Participants completed two psychometrically-tested EBP questionnaires at two timepoints. The Evidence-Based Practice Profile questionnaire collected self-report EBP data (Terminology, Relevance, Confidence, Practice, Sympathy) and the Knowledge of Research Evidence Competencies collected objective data (Actual Knowledge). Changes were calculated using descriptive statistics (paired t-tests, 95% CI, effect sizes). Qualitative interview data collected at one timepoint were analysed using a descriptive approach and thematic analysis, to examine the lived experience of participants in the context of their first employment. The aim of the mixed methods approach was a broader and deeper understanding of participants’ first year of employment and using EBP. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 50 participants who completed both questionnaires at the two timepoints. After one year in the workforce, there was a significant decrease in participants’ perceptions of Relevance (p<0.001) and Confidence with EBP (p<0.001) and non-significant decreases in the other domains. Effect sizes showed medium decreases for Relevance (0.69) and Confidence (0.57), small decreases in Terminology (0.28) and Practice (0.23), and very small decreases in Sympathy (0.08) and Actual Knowledge (0.11). Seven themes described participants experience of using EBP in their first working year. CONCLUSIONS: After a year in the workplace, confidence and perceptions of relevance of EBP were significantly reduced. A subtle interplay of features related to workplace culture, competing demands to develop clinical skills, internal and external motivators to use EBP and patient expectations, together with availability of resources and time, may impact early graduates’ perceptions of EBP. Workplace role models who immersed themselves in evidence discussion and experience were inspiring to early graduates. Public Library of Science 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7751960/ /pubmed/33347468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244190 Text en © 2020 McEvoy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McEvoy, Maureen
Luker, Julie
Fryer, Caroline
Lewis, Lucy K
Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title_full Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title_short Changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: A mixed-methods study
title_sort changes in physiotherapists’ perceptions of evidence-based practice after a year in the workforce: a mixed-methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33347468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244190
work_keys_str_mv AT mcevoymaureen changesinphysiotherapistsperceptionsofevidencebasedpracticeafterayearintheworkforceamixedmethodsstudy
AT lukerjulie changesinphysiotherapistsperceptionsofevidencebasedpracticeafterayearintheworkforceamixedmethodsstudy
AT fryercaroline changesinphysiotherapistsperceptionsofevidencebasedpracticeafterayearintheworkforceamixedmethodsstudy
AT lewislucyk changesinphysiotherapistsperceptionsofevidencebasedpracticeafterayearintheworkforceamixedmethodsstudy