Cargando…

Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19

OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso, Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón, Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria, Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo, López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra, Colin‐Martinez, Tania, Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis, Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo, Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio, Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe, Wacher Rodarte, Niels H., González‐Virla, Baldomero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482
_version_ 1783625776027926528
author Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso
Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón
Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria
Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo
López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra
Colin‐Martinez, Tania
Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis
Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo
Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio
Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe
Wacher Rodarte, Niels H.
González‐Virla, Baldomero
author_facet Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso
Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón
Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria
Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo
López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra
Colin‐Martinez, Tania
Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis
Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo
Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio
Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe
Wacher Rodarte, Niels H.
González‐Virla, Baldomero
author_sort Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as screening tool for COVID‐19. METHODS: Cross‐sectional, observational, and pro‐elective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital from May 25th to June 30th, 2020. One hundred and thirty‐nine patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected from anamnesis. A Self‐Perception Questionnaire and psychophysical olfactory test (POT) were applied to all participants. The presence of SARS‐CoV2, was detected by RT‐PCR methods. RESULTS: 51.7% of patients were SARS‐CoV‐2 positive. A sensitivity of 50% was obtained for the self‐perception questionnaire as a screening tool for SARS‐CoV2, with a specificity of 80.59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was of 73.46%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was of 60%. The POT as a screening tool had a PPV of 82.35%, a NPV of 52.45%, a LR+ of 4.34, a LR‐ 0.84. The combination of anosmia (according to the POT) plus cough and asthenia got an OR of 8.25 for the SARS CoV‐2 infection. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between olfactory dysfunction and COVID‐19. However, it is not really efficient in the screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and thus, they should not be considered as a single diagnostic instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7752039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77520392020-12-23 Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra Colin‐Martinez, Tania Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe Wacher Rodarte, Niels H. González‐Virla, Baldomero Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as screening tool for COVID‐19. METHODS: Cross‐sectional, observational, and pro‐elective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital from May 25th to June 30th, 2020. One hundred and thirty‐nine patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected from anamnesis. A Self‐Perception Questionnaire and psychophysical olfactory test (POT) were applied to all participants. The presence of SARS‐CoV2, was detected by RT‐PCR methods. RESULTS: 51.7% of patients were SARS‐CoV‐2 positive. A sensitivity of 50% was obtained for the self‐perception questionnaire as a screening tool for SARS‐CoV2, with a specificity of 80.59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was of 73.46%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was of 60%. The POT as a screening tool had a PPV of 82.35%, a NPV of 52.45%, a LR+ of 4.34, a LR‐ 0.84. The combination of anosmia (according to the POT) plus cough and asthenia got an OR of 8.25 for the SARS CoV‐2 infection. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between olfactory dysfunction and COVID‐19. However, it is not really efficient in the screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and thus, they should not be considered as a single diagnostic instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7752039/ /pubmed/33364386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology
Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso
Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón
Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria
Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo
López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra
Colin‐Martinez, Tania
Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis
Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo
Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio
Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe
Wacher Rodarte, Niels H.
González‐Virla, Baldomero
Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title_full Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title_fullStr Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title_short Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
title_sort evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for covid‐19
topic Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482
work_keys_str_mv AT romerogameroscarlosalfonso evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT waizelhaiatsalomon evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT mendozazubietavictoria evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT anayadyckalfredo evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT lopezmorenomayraalejandra evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT colinmartineztania evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT martinezordazjoseluis evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT feratosorioeduardo evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT vivaracevedoeulalio evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT vargasortegaguadalupe evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT wacherrodartenielsh evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19
AT gonzalezvirlabaldomero evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19