Cargando…
Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19
OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482 |
_version_ | 1783625776027926528 |
---|---|
author | Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra Colin‐Martinez, Tania Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe Wacher Rodarte, Niels H. González‐Virla, Baldomero |
author_facet | Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra Colin‐Martinez, Tania Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe Wacher Rodarte, Niels H. González‐Virla, Baldomero |
author_sort | Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as screening tool for COVID‐19. METHODS: Cross‐sectional, observational, and pro‐elective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital from May 25th to June 30th, 2020. One hundred and thirty‐nine patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected from anamnesis. A Self‐Perception Questionnaire and psychophysical olfactory test (POT) were applied to all participants. The presence of SARS‐CoV2, was detected by RT‐PCR methods. RESULTS: 51.7% of patients were SARS‐CoV‐2 positive. A sensitivity of 50% was obtained for the self‐perception questionnaire as a screening tool for SARS‐CoV2, with a specificity of 80.59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was of 73.46%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was of 60%. The POT as a screening tool had a PPV of 82.35%, a NPV of 52.45%, a LR+ of 4.34, a LR‐ 0.84. The combination of anosmia (according to the POT) plus cough and asthenia got an OR of 8.25 for the SARS CoV‐2 infection. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between olfactory dysfunction and COVID‐19. However, it is not really efficient in the screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and thus, they should not be considered as a single diagnostic instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77520392020-12-23 Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra Colin‐Martinez, Tania Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe Wacher Rodarte, Niels H. González‐Virla, Baldomero Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology OBJECTIVES: At the end of 2019, SARS‐CoV‐2 was identified, the one responsible for the COVID‐19 disease. Between a 5.1% and a 98% of COVID‐19 patients present some form of alteration in their sense of smell. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic yield of the smell dysfunction as screening tool for COVID‐19. METHODS: Cross‐sectional, observational, and pro‐elective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital from May 25th to June 30th, 2020. One hundred and thirty‐nine patients were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected from anamnesis. A Self‐Perception Questionnaire and psychophysical olfactory test (POT) were applied to all participants. The presence of SARS‐CoV2, was detected by RT‐PCR methods. RESULTS: 51.7% of patients were SARS‐CoV‐2 positive. A sensitivity of 50% was obtained for the self‐perception questionnaire as a screening tool for SARS‐CoV2, with a specificity of 80.59%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was of 73.46%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was of 60%. The POT as a screening tool had a PPV of 82.35%, a NPV of 52.45%, a LR+ of 4.34, a LR‐ 0.84. The combination of anosmia (according to the POT) plus cough and asthenia got an OR of 8.25 for the SARS CoV‐2 infection. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between olfactory dysfunction and COVID‐19. However, it is not really efficient in the screening of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and thus, they should not be considered as a single diagnostic instrument. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7752039/ /pubmed/33364386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology Romero‐Gameros, Carlos Alfonso Waizel‐Haiat, Salomón Mendoza‐Zubieta, Victoria Anaya‐Dyck, Alfredo López‐Moreno, Mayra Alejandra Colin‐Martinez, Tania Martínez‐Ordaz, José Luis Ferat‐Osorio, Eduardo Vivar‐Acevedo, Eulalio Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe Wacher Rodarte, Niels H. González‐Virla, Baldomero Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title | Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title_full | Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title_short | Evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for COVID‐19 |
title_sort | evaluation of predictive value of olfactory dysfunction, as a screening tool for covid‐19 |
topic | Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romerogameroscarlosalfonso evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT waizelhaiatsalomon evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT mendozazubietavictoria evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT anayadyckalfredo evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT lopezmorenomayraalejandra evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT colinmartineztania evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT martinezordazjoseluis evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT feratosorioeduardo evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT vivaracevedoeulalio evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT vargasortegaguadalupe evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT wacherrodartenielsh evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 AT gonzalezvirlabaldomero evaluationofpredictivevalueofolfactorydysfunctionasascreeningtoolforcovid19 |