Cargando…

Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feedback‐dependent vocal control in cochlear implant patients using pitch‐shifted auditory feedback. METHODS: Twenty‐three CI recipients with at least 6 months of implant experience were enrolled. Vocal recordings were performed while subjects repeated the vowel /e/ and vocal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gautam, Anirudh, Brant, Jason A., Ruckenstein, Michael J., Eliades, Steven J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.481
_version_ 1783625778933530624
author Gautam, Anirudh
Brant, Jason A.
Ruckenstein, Michael J.
Eliades, Steven J.
author_facet Gautam, Anirudh
Brant, Jason A.
Ruckenstein, Michael J.
Eliades, Steven J.
author_sort Gautam, Anirudh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feedback‐dependent vocal control in cochlear implant patients using pitch‐shifted auditory feedback. METHODS: Twenty‐three CI recipients with at least 6 months of implant experience were enrolled. Vocal recordings were performed while subjects repeated the vowel /e/ and vocal signals were altered in real‐time using a digital effects processor to introduce a pitch‐shift, presented back to subjects using headphones. Recordings were analyzed to determine pitch changes following the pitch‐shifted feedback, and results compared to the magnitude of the shift as well as patient demographics. RESULTS: Consistent with previous results, CI patients' voices had higher pitches with their implant turned off, a change explainable by increases in vocal loudness without the CI. CI patients rapidly compensated for pitch‐shifted feedback by changing their vocal pitch, but only for larger shifts. Considerable inter‐subject variability was present, and weakly correlated with the duration of implant experience and implant sound thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: CI patients, like normal hearing individuals, are capable of real‐time feedback‐dependent control of their vocal pitch. However, CI patients are less sensitive to small feedback changes, possibly a result of courser CI frequency precision, and may explain poorer than normal vocal control in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7752050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77520502020-12-23 Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients Gautam, Anirudh Brant, Jason A. Ruckenstein, Michael J. Eliades, Steven J. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feedback‐dependent vocal control in cochlear implant patients using pitch‐shifted auditory feedback. METHODS: Twenty‐three CI recipients with at least 6 months of implant experience were enrolled. Vocal recordings were performed while subjects repeated the vowel /e/ and vocal signals were altered in real‐time using a digital effects processor to introduce a pitch‐shift, presented back to subjects using headphones. Recordings were analyzed to determine pitch changes following the pitch‐shifted feedback, and results compared to the magnitude of the shift as well as patient demographics. RESULTS: Consistent with previous results, CI patients' voices had higher pitches with their implant turned off, a change explainable by increases in vocal loudness without the CI. CI patients rapidly compensated for pitch‐shifted feedback by changing their vocal pitch, but only for larger shifts. Considerable inter‐subject variability was present, and weakly correlated with the duration of implant experience and implant sound thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: CI patients, like normal hearing individuals, are capable of real‐time feedback‐dependent control of their vocal pitch. However, CI patients are less sensitive to small feedback changes, possibly a result of courser CI frequency precision, and may explain poorer than normal vocal control in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7752050/ /pubmed/33364407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.481 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Gautam, Anirudh
Brant, Jason A.
Ruckenstein, Michael J.
Eliades, Steven J.
Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title_full Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title_fullStr Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title_short Real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
title_sort real‐time feedback control of voice in cochlear implant recipients
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.481
work_keys_str_mv AT gautamanirudh realtimefeedbackcontrolofvoiceincochlearimplantrecipients
AT brantjasona realtimefeedbackcontrolofvoiceincochlearimplantrecipients
AT ruckensteinmichaelj realtimefeedbackcontrolofvoiceincochlearimplantrecipients
AT eliadesstevenj realtimefeedbackcontrolofvoiceincochlearimplantrecipients