Cargando…

Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND: Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health‐care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haste, Anna, Lambert, Mark, Sharp, Linda, Thomson, Richard, Sowden, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13136
_version_ 1783625809224794112
author Haste, Anna
Lambert, Mark
Sharp, Linda
Thomson, Richard
Sowden, Sarah
author_facet Haste, Anna
Lambert, Mark
Sharp, Linda
Thomson, Richard
Sowden, Sarah
author_sort Haste, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health‐care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment within the recommended 62 days of referral. OBJECTIVE: We explored patients’ experiences to identify areas for service improvement. DESIGN: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients who were referred through the urgent (two‐week) GP referral route and were within six months of receiving first treatment were recruited. DATA ANALYSIS: Data from the interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Four themes were developed: organization of care; diagnosis; support; and views and expectations of the NHS. Patients described cross‐cutting issues such as complex and varied pathways and uncertainty about what would happen next. They felt daunted by the intensity and speed of investigations. They were presented with a recommended course of action rather than options and had little involvement in decision making. They were grateful for care, reluctant to complain and resigned to the status quo. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In order to meet patient needs, the NHS needs to improve communication and streamline pathways. Future cancer pathways also need to be designed to support shared decision making, be truly person‐centred and informed by patient experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7752202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77522022020-12-23 Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer Haste, Anna Lambert, Mark Sharp, Linda Thomson, Richard Sowden, Sarah Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Timeliness is viewed as a key feature of health‐care quality. Internationally, this is challenging. In England, cancer waiting time targets are currently not being met. For example, between 2015 and 2018 only 71% of patients with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer started treatment within the recommended 62 days of referral. OBJECTIVE: We explored patients’ experiences to identify areas for service improvement. DESIGN: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients who were referred through the urgent (two‐week) GP referral route and were within six months of receiving first treatment were recruited. DATA ANALYSIS: Data from the interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Four themes were developed: organization of care; diagnosis; support; and views and expectations of the NHS. Patients described cross‐cutting issues such as complex and varied pathways and uncertainty about what would happen next. They felt daunted by the intensity and speed of investigations. They were presented with a recommended course of action rather than options and had little involvement in decision making. They were grateful for care, reluctant to complain and resigned to the status quo. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In order to meet patient needs, the NHS needs to improve communication and streamline pathways. Future cancer pathways also need to be designed to support shared decision making, be truly person‐centred and informed by patient experience. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-28 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7752202/ /pubmed/32989907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13136 Text en © 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Haste, Anna
Lambert, Mark
Sharp, Linda
Thomson, Richard
Sowden, Sarah
Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title_full Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title_fullStr Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title_short Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—Can the NHS do better? Semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
title_sort patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway—can the nhs do better? semi‐structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13136
work_keys_str_mv AT hasteanna patientexperiencesoftheurgentcancerreferralpathwaycanthenhsdobettersemistructuredinterviewswithpatientswithuppergastrointestinalcancer
AT lambertmark patientexperiencesoftheurgentcancerreferralpathwaycanthenhsdobettersemistructuredinterviewswithpatientswithuppergastrointestinalcancer
AT sharplinda patientexperiencesoftheurgentcancerreferralpathwaycanthenhsdobettersemistructuredinterviewswithpatientswithuppergastrointestinalcancer
AT thomsonrichard patientexperiencesoftheurgentcancerreferralpathwaycanthenhsdobettersemistructuredinterviewswithpatientswithuppergastrointestinalcancer
AT sowdensarah patientexperiencesoftheurgentcancerreferralpathwaycanthenhsdobettersemistructuredinterviewswithpatientswithuppergastrointestinalcancer