Cargando…
Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians
Recent research points to considerable rates of preventable perioperative patient harm and anaesthesiologists’ concerns about eroding patient safety. Anaesthesia has always been at the forefront of patient safety improvement initiatives. However, factual local safety improvement requires local measu...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000930 |
_version_ | 1783625818825555968 |
---|---|
author | Wacker, Johannes |
author_facet | Wacker, Johannes |
author_sort | Wacker, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent research points to considerable rates of preventable perioperative patient harm and anaesthesiologists’ concerns about eroding patient safety. Anaesthesia has always been at the forefront of patient safety improvement initiatives. However, factual local safety improvement requires local measurement, which may be afflicted by barriers to data collection and improvement activities. Because many of these barriers are related to mandatory reporting, the focus of this review is on measurement methods that can be used by practicing anaesthesiologists as self-improvement tools, even independently from mandatory reporting, and using basic techniques widely available in most institutions. RECENT FINDINGS: Four mutually complementary measurement approaches may be suited for local patient safety learning: incident and rate-based measurements, staff surveys and patient surveys. Reportedly, individual methods have helped to tailor problem solutions and to reduce patient harm, morbidity, and mortality. SUMMARY: Considering the potential for perioperative patient safety measurements to improve patient outcomes, the absence of a generally accepted measurement standard and manifold barriers to reporting, a pragmatic approach to locally measuring patient safety appears advisable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77522442020-12-22 Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians Wacker, Johannes Curr Opin Anaesthesiol TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND SAFETY: Edited by Keith J. Ruskin Recent research points to considerable rates of preventable perioperative patient harm and anaesthesiologists’ concerns about eroding patient safety. Anaesthesia has always been at the forefront of patient safety improvement initiatives. However, factual local safety improvement requires local measurement, which may be afflicted by barriers to data collection and improvement activities. Because many of these barriers are related to mandatory reporting, the focus of this review is on measurement methods that can be used by practicing anaesthesiologists as self-improvement tools, even independently from mandatory reporting, and using basic techniques widely available in most institutions. RECENT FINDINGS: Four mutually complementary measurement approaches may be suited for local patient safety learning: incident and rate-based measurements, staff surveys and patient surveys. Reportedly, individual methods have helped to tailor problem solutions and to reduce patient harm, morbidity, and mortality. SUMMARY: Considering the potential for perioperative patient safety measurements to improve patient outcomes, the absence of a generally accepted measurement standard and manifold barriers to reporting, a pragmatic approach to locally measuring patient safety appears advisable. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7752244/ /pubmed/33002960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000930 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND SAFETY: Edited by Keith J. Ruskin Wacker, Johannes Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title | Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title_full | Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title_fullStr | Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title_short | Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
title_sort | measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians |
topic | TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND SAFETY: Edited by Keith J. Ruskin |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wackerjohannes measuringandmonitoringperioperativepatientsafetyabasicapproachforclinicians |