Cargando…
Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis
BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that social media–based public health campaigns are often targeted by countercampaigns. OBJECTIVE: Using reactance theory as the theoretical framework, this research characterizes the nature of public response to tobacco prevention messages disseminated via a soci...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284120 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20649 |
_version_ | 1783625882168983552 |
---|---|
author | Majmundar, Anuja Le, NamQuyen Moran, Meghan Bridgid Unger, Jennifer B Reuter, Katja |
author_facet | Majmundar, Anuja Le, NamQuyen Moran, Meghan Bridgid Unger, Jennifer B Reuter, Katja |
author_sort | Majmundar, Anuja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that social media–based public health campaigns are often targeted by countercampaigns. OBJECTIVE: Using reactance theory as the theoretical framework, this research characterizes the nature of public response to tobacco prevention messages disseminated via a social media–based campaign. We also examine whether agreement with the prevention messages is associated with comment tone and nature of the contribution to the overall discussion. METHODS: User comments to tobacco prevention messages, posted between April 19, 2017 and July 12, 2017, were extracted from Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Two coders categorized comments in terms of tone, agreement with message, nature of contribution, mentions of government agency and regulation, promotional or spam comments, and format of comment. Chi-square analyses tested associations between agreement with the message and tone of the public response and the nature of contributions to the discussions. RESULTS: Of the 1242 comments received (Twitter: n=1004; Facebook: n=176; Instagram: n=62), many comments used a negative tone (42.75%) and disagreed with the health messages (39.77%), while the majority made healthy contributions to the discussions (84.38%). Only 0.56% of messages mentioned government agencies, and only 0.48% of the comments were antiregulation. Comments employing a positive tone (84.13%) or making healthy contributions (69.11%) were more likely to agree with the campaign messages (P=0.01). Comments employing a negative tone (71.25%) or making toxic contributions (36.26%) generally disagreed with the messages (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of user comments in response to a tobacco prevention campaign made healthy contributions. Our findings encourage the use of social media to promote dialogue about controversial health topics such as smoking. However, toxicity was characteristic of comments that disagreed with the health messages. Managing negative and toxic comments on social media is a crucial issue for social media–based tobacco prevention campaigns to consider. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77525232020-12-30 Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis Majmundar, Anuja Le, NamQuyen Moran, Meghan Bridgid Unger, Jennifer B Reuter, Katja JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that social media–based public health campaigns are often targeted by countercampaigns. OBJECTIVE: Using reactance theory as the theoretical framework, this research characterizes the nature of public response to tobacco prevention messages disseminated via a social media–based campaign. We also examine whether agreement with the prevention messages is associated with comment tone and nature of the contribution to the overall discussion. METHODS: User comments to tobacco prevention messages, posted between April 19, 2017 and July 12, 2017, were extracted from Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Two coders categorized comments in terms of tone, agreement with message, nature of contribution, mentions of government agency and regulation, promotional or spam comments, and format of comment. Chi-square analyses tested associations between agreement with the message and tone of the public response and the nature of contributions to the discussions. RESULTS: Of the 1242 comments received (Twitter: n=1004; Facebook: n=176; Instagram: n=62), many comments used a negative tone (42.75%) and disagreed with the health messages (39.77%), while the majority made healthy contributions to the discussions (84.38%). Only 0.56% of messages mentioned government agencies, and only 0.48% of the comments were antiregulation. Comments employing a positive tone (84.13%) or making healthy contributions (69.11%) were more likely to agree with the campaign messages (P=0.01). Comments employing a negative tone (71.25%) or making toxic contributions (36.26%) generally disagreed with the messages (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of user comments in response to a tobacco prevention campaign made healthy contributions. Our findings encourage the use of social media to promote dialogue about controversial health topics such as smoking. However, toxicity was characteristic of comments that disagreed with the health messages. Managing negative and toxic comments on social media is a crucial issue for social media–based tobacco prevention campaigns to consider. JMIR Publications 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7752523/ /pubmed/33284120 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20649 Text en ©Anuja Majmundar, NamQuyen Le, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Jennifer B Unger, Katja Reuter. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 07.12.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Majmundar, Anuja Le, NamQuyen Moran, Meghan Bridgid Unger, Jennifer B Reuter, Katja Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title | Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title_full | Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title_fullStr | Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title_short | Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis |
title_sort | public response to a social media tobacco prevention campaign: content analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284120 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/20649 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majmundaranuja publicresponsetoasocialmediatobaccopreventioncampaigncontentanalysis AT lenamquyen publicresponsetoasocialmediatobaccopreventioncampaigncontentanalysis AT moranmeghanbridgid publicresponsetoasocialmediatobaccopreventioncampaigncontentanalysis AT ungerjenniferb publicresponsetoasocialmediatobaccopreventioncampaigncontentanalysis AT reuterkatja publicresponsetoasocialmediatobaccopreventioncampaigncontentanalysis |