Cargando…

Latent class trajectories: U.S. adolescents’ nicotine use and its association with nicotine dependence

INTRODUCTION: Twenty-seven percent of adolescents used a nicotine/tobacco product in 2018. Our study analyzed three waves from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study and examined adolescent nicotine/tobacco use trajectories over time to determine which latent classes were assoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyd, Carol J., Veliz, Philip, Evans-Polce, Rebecca, Eisman, Andria B., Esteban McCabe, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100303
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Twenty-seven percent of adolescents used a nicotine/tobacco product in 2018. Our study analyzed three waves from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study and examined adolescent nicotine/tobacco use trajectories over time to determine which latent classes were associated with symptoms of nicotine dependence. METHODS: The PATH Study used a four-stage, stratified area probability sample and annual household interviews with adolescents (12–17 years). Adolescents who indicated past 30-day nicotine/tobacco use at least once were included (n = 1101). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify nicotine/tobacco trajectories across three waves of PATH data and their association with six symptoms consistent with nicotine dependence from the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68). RESULTS: All types of past 30-day nicotine/tobacco use increased across the three waves. An LCA model fit was assessed using both the CIV and entropy measures in conjunction with the Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin LRT. A five latent class solution had the lowest BIC value (BIC = 9784.272), and resulted in: (1) “Stable/consistent multiproduct use trajectory”, (2) “Increasing cigarette use trajectory”, (3) “Increasing e-cigarette use trajectory”, (4) “Experimental (poly-nicotine/tobacco) use trajectory”, and (5) “Increasing other nicotine/tobacco use trajectory”. The most prevalent was the “Experimental (poly-nicotine/tobacco) use trajectory” (33.8%) although sex, race, and social class were associated with different trajectories. Those represented by the “Increasing cigarette use trajectory” (19.4%) reported significantly more past-year nicotine dependence symptoms (b = 1.73, p < 0.001) compared to the “Increasing e-cigarette use trajectory”. Findings varied by sex and race. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the relationship between e-cigarette use and other forms of nicotine/tobacco and substance use is complex and that adolescent nicotine/tobacco users are a heterogenous group with different risks for nicotine dependence. Findings can inform tailored prevention education and messaging for different groups of youth.