Cargando…
Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity
BACKGROUND: The REACT DX registry evaluates standard therapies to episodes of long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias and assesses the quality of sensing and stability of the lead and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (BIOTRONIK Lumax VR-T DX and successors) over at least a 1-year follow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.596844 |
_version_ | 1783625946562035712 |
---|---|
author | Wessel, Niels Berg, Karsten Kraemer, Jan F. Gapelyuk, Andrej Rietsch, Katrin Hauser, Tino Kurths, Jürgen Wenzel, Dave Klein, Norbert Kolb, Christof Belke, Roberto Schirdewan, Alexander Kääb, Stefan |
author_facet | Wessel, Niels Berg, Karsten Kraemer, Jan F. Gapelyuk, Andrej Rietsch, Katrin Hauser, Tino Kurths, Jürgen Wenzel, Dave Klein, Norbert Kolb, Christof Belke, Roberto Schirdewan, Alexander Kääb, Stefan |
author_sort | Wessel, Niels |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The REACT DX registry evaluates standard therapies to episodes of long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias and assesses the quality of sensing and stability of the lead and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (BIOTRONIK Lumax VR-T DX and successors) over at least a 1-year follow-up period. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between the risk of de novo device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF), the autonomic perturbations before the onset of paroxysmal AF and a 7-days heart rate variability (7dHRV) 1 month after ICD implantation. METHODS: The registry consists of 234 patients implanted with an ICD, including 10 with de novo long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias with no prior history of AF. The patients were matched via the propensity-score methodology as well as for properties directly influencing the ECGs recorded using GE CardioMem CM 3000. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed using standard parameters from time- and frequency-domains, and from non-linear dynamics. RESULTS: No linear HRV was associated with an increased risk of AF (p = n.s.). The only significant approach was derived from symbolic dynamics with the parameter “forbidden words” which distinguished both groups on all 7 days of measurements (p < 0.05), thereby quantifying the heart rate complexity (HRC) as drastically lower in the de novo AF group. CONCLUSION: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction denoted by low HRC may be associated with higher AF incidence. For patients with mild to moderate heart failure, standard HRV parameters are not appropriate to quantify cardiac autonomic perturbations before the onset of AF. Further studies are needed to determine the individual risk for AF that would enable interventions to restore autonomic balance in the general population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77528082020-12-23 Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity Wessel, Niels Berg, Karsten Kraemer, Jan F. Gapelyuk, Andrej Rietsch, Katrin Hauser, Tino Kurths, Jürgen Wenzel, Dave Klein, Norbert Kolb, Christof Belke, Roberto Schirdewan, Alexander Kääb, Stefan Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: The REACT DX registry evaluates standard therapies to episodes of long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias and assesses the quality of sensing and stability of the lead and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (BIOTRONIK Lumax VR-T DX and successors) over at least a 1-year follow-up period. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between the risk of de novo device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF), the autonomic perturbations before the onset of paroxysmal AF and a 7-days heart rate variability (7dHRV) 1 month after ICD implantation. METHODS: The registry consists of 234 patients implanted with an ICD, including 10 with de novo long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias with no prior history of AF. The patients were matched via the propensity-score methodology as well as for properties directly influencing the ECGs recorded using GE CardioMem CM 3000. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed using standard parameters from time- and frequency-domains, and from non-linear dynamics. RESULTS: No linear HRV was associated with an increased risk of AF (p = n.s.). The only significant approach was derived from symbolic dynamics with the parameter “forbidden words” which distinguished both groups on all 7 days of measurements (p < 0.05), thereby quantifying the heart rate complexity (HRC) as drastically lower in the de novo AF group. CONCLUSION: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction denoted by low HRC may be associated with higher AF incidence. For patients with mild to moderate heart failure, standard HRV parameters are not appropriate to quantify cardiac autonomic perturbations before the onset of AF. Further studies are needed to determine the individual risk for AF that would enable interventions to restore autonomic balance in the general population. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7752808/ /pubmed/33363477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.596844 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wessel, Berg, Kraemer, Gapelyuk, Rietsch, Hauser, Kurths, Wenzel, Klein, Kolb, Belke, Schirdewan and Kääb. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Wessel, Niels Berg, Karsten Kraemer, Jan F. Gapelyuk, Andrej Rietsch, Katrin Hauser, Tino Kurths, Jürgen Wenzel, Dave Klein, Norbert Kolb, Christof Belke, Roberto Schirdewan, Alexander Kääb, Stefan Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title | Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title_full | Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title_short | Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity |
title_sort | cardiac autonomic dysfunction and incidence of de novo atrial fibrillation: heart rate variability vs. heart rate complexity |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.596844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesselniels cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT bergkarsten cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT kraemerjanf cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT gapelyukandrej cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT rietschkatrin cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT hausertino cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT kurthsjurgen cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT wenzeldave cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT kleinnorbert cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT kolbchristof cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT belkeroberto cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT schirdewanalexander cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity AT kaabstefan cardiacautonomicdysfunctionandincidenceofdenovoatrialfibrillationheartratevariabilityvsheartratecomplexity |