Cargando…

Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task

Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberger, K., Simmler, M., Nawroth, C., Langbein, J., Keil, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w
_version_ 1783625962108223488
author Rosenberger, K.
Simmler, M.
Nawroth, C.
Langbein, J.
Keil, N.
author_facet Rosenberger, K.
Simmler, M.
Nawroth, C.
Langbein, J.
Keil, N.
author_sort Rosenberger, K.
collection PubMed
description Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and whether breeding for productivity traits has altered its occurrence. In a manipulation task, we compared two selection lines: 27 Nigerian dwarf goats, not bred for productivity traits, and 30 dairy goats, bred for high milk yield. Over 10 trials, each goat could perform one of three behaviours: not participating in the trial, feeding for free from an open door, or opening a sliding door for a feed of similar value. The results were analysed using an Item Response Tree (IRTree) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The fitted probabilities to participate were > 0.87 over all trials in both selection lines. For dwarf goats, the probability of choosing the closed door, and thereby demonstrating CFL, increased from 0.30 in Trial 1 to 0.53 in Trial 10. For dairy goats, this probability was constant at approximately 0.43. Unlike dwarf goats, dairy goats were faster to approach the closed compared to the open door. Overall, our results suggest that both selection lines were similarly interested in CFL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7752918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77529182020-12-22 Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task Rosenberger, K. Simmler, M. Nawroth, C. Langbein, J. Keil, N. Sci Rep Article Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and whether breeding for productivity traits has altered its occurrence. In a manipulation task, we compared two selection lines: 27 Nigerian dwarf goats, not bred for productivity traits, and 30 dairy goats, bred for high milk yield. Over 10 trials, each goat could perform one of three behaviours: not participating in the trial, feeding for free from an open door, or opening a sliding door for a feed of similar value. The results were analysed using an Item Response Tree (IRTree) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The fitted probabilities to participate were > 0.87 over all trials in both selection lines. For dwarf goats, the probability of choosing the closed door, and thereby demonstrating CFL, increased from 0.30 in Trial 1 to 0.53 in Trial 10. For dairy goats, this probability was constant at approximately 0.43. Unlike dwarf goats, dairy goats were faster to approach the closed compared to the open door. Overall, our results suggest that both selection lines were similarly interested in CFL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7752918/ /pubmed/33349649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rosenberger, K.
Simmler, M.
Nawroth, C.
Langbein, J.
Keil, N.
Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title_full Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title_fullStr Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title_full_unstemmed Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title_short Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
title_sort goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenbergerk goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask
AT simmlerm goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask
AT nawrothc goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask
AT langbeinj goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask
AT keiln goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask