Cargando…
Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task
Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w |
_version_ | 1783625962108223488 |
---|---|
author | Rosenberger, K. Simmler, M. Nawroth, C. Langbein, J. Keil, N. |
author_facet | Rosenberger, K. Simmler, M. Nawroth, C. Langbein, J. Keil, N. |
author_sort | Rosenberger, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and whether breeding for productivity traits has altered its occurrence. In a manipulation task, we compared two selection lines: 27 Nigerian dwarf goats, not bred for productivity traits, and 30 dairy goats, bred for high milk yield. Over 10 trials, each goat could perform one of three behaviours: not participating in the trial, feeding for free from an open door, or opening a sliding door for a feed of similar value. The results were analysed using an Item Response Tree (IRTree) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The fitted probabilities to participate were > 0.87 over all trials in both selection lines. For dwarf goats, the probability of choosing the closed door, and thereby demonstrating CFL, increased from 0.30 in Trial 1 to 0.53 in Trial 10. For dairy goats, this probability was constant at approximately 0.43. Unlike dwarf goats, dairy goats were faster to approach the closed compared to the open door. Overall, our results suggest that both selection lines were similarly interested in CFL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77529182020-12-22 Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task Rosenberger, K. Simmler, M. Nawroth, C. Langbein, J. Keil, N. Sci Rep Article Contrafreeloading (CFL) is the phenomenon when animals work for a resource although an identical resource is available for free. Possible explanations for CFL are that animals seek context for species-specific behaviours or to control their environments. We investigated whether goats show CFL and whether breeding for productivity traits has altered its occurrence. In a manipulation task, we compared two selection lines: 27 Nigerian dwarf goats, not bred for productivity traits, and 30 dairy goats, bred for high milk yield. Over 10 trials, each goat could perform one of three behaviours: not participating in the trial, feeding for free from an open door, or opening a sliding door for a feed of similar value. The results were analysed using an Item Response Tree (IRTree) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). The fitted probabilities to participate were > 0.87 over all trials in both selection lines. For dwarf goats, the probability of choosing the closed door, and thereby demonstrating CFL, increased from 0.30 in Trial 1 to 0.53 in Trial 10. For dairy goats, this probability was constant at approximately 0.43. Unlike dwarf goats, dairy goats were faster to approach the closed compared to the open door. Overall, our results suggest that both selection lines were similarly interested in CFL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7752918/ /pubmed/33349649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosenberger, K. Simmler, M. Nawroth, C. Langbein, J. Keil, N. Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title | Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title_full | Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title_fullStr | Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title_full_unstemmed | Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title_short | Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
title_sort | goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenbergerk goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask AT simmlerm goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask AT nawrothc goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask AT langbeinj goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask AT keiln goatsworkforfoodinacontrafreeloadingtask |