Cargando…
The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9 |
_version_ | 1783625964678283264 |
---|---|
author | Klusmann, Verena Notthoff, Nanna Beyer, Ann-Kristin Blawert, Anne Gabrian, Martina |
author_facet | Klusmann, Verena Notthoff, Nanna Beyer, Ann-Kristin Blawert, Anne Gabrian, Martina |
author_sort | Klusmann, Verena |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people’s own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of Ecosystem, Balance, Stability, Dynamics, and Complexity. It becomes apparent, however, that approaches to measure views on ageing should be extended to more specifically target the implicit level as well as affective, physiological, and behavioural manifestations. Additionally, means for capturing views on ageing on the societal level and tools with a distinct time reference are needed. This is particularly important when one wants to account for the lifelong dynamics of views on ageing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7752934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77529342020-12-28 The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions Klusmann, Verena Notthoff, Nanna Beyer, Ann-Kristin Blawert, Anne Gabrian, Martina Eur J Ageing Review This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people’s own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of Ecosystem, Balance, Stability, Dynamics, and Complexity. It becomes apparent, however, that approaches to measure views on ageing should be extended to more specifically target the implicit level as well as affective, physiological, and behavioural manifestations. Additionally, means for capturing views on ageing on the societal level and tools with a distinct time reference are needed. This is particularly important when one wants to account for the lifelong dynamics of views on ageing. Springer Netherlands 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7752934/ /pubmed/33376461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Klusmann, Verena Notthoff, Nanna Beyer, Ann-Kristin Blawert, Anne Gabrian, Martina The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title | The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title_full | The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title_fullStr | The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title_full_unstemmed | The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title_short | The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
title_sort | assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klusmannverena theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT notthoffnanna theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT beyerannkristin theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT blawertanne theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT gabrianmartina theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT klusmannverena assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT notthoffnanna assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT beyerannkristin assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT blawertanne assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions AT gabrianmartina assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions |