Cargando…

The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions

This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klusmann, Verena, Notthoff, Nanna, Beyer, Ann-Kristin, Blawert, Anne, Gabrian, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9
_version_ 1783625964678283264
author Klusmann, Verena
Notthoff, Nanna
Beyer, Ann-Kristin
Blawert, Anne
Gabrian, Martina
author_facet Klusmann, Verena
Notthoff, Nanna
Beyer, Ann-Kristin
Blawert, Anne
Gabrian, Martina
author_sort Klusmann, Verena
collection PubMed
description This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people’s own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of Ecosystem, Balance, Stability, Dynamics, and Complexity. It becomes apparent, however, that approaches to measure views on ageing should be extended to more specifically target the implicit level as well as affective, physiological, and behavioural manifestations. Additionally, means for capturing views on ageing on the societal level and tools with a distinct time reference are needed. This is particularly important when one wants to account for the lifelong dynamics of views on ageing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7752934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77529342020-12-28 The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions Klusmann, Verena Notthoff, Nanna Beyer, Ann-Kristin Blawert, Anne Gabrian, Martina Eur J Ageing Review This is a review of existing self-report measures for assessing views on ageing. It provides an overview of instruments, for which basic psychometric properties are available and describes them according to the purposes for which they are suitable. Literature search resulted in the inclusion of 89 instruments which were categorised along eight dimensions. The majority of measures focus on explicit cognitions about people’s own age and ageing or other (older) people. A substantial amount of tools account for the multidimensionality and multidirectionality of views on ageing, i.e. the idea that ageing is accompanied by both gains and losses in several different domains. To some extent, measures reflect that ageing is a long-term process and that views on ageing are malleable, rather than just stable traits. Cluster analysis revealed heterogeneity in instruments regarding the dimensions of Ecosystem, Balance, Stability, Dynamics, and Complexity. It becomes apparent, however, that approaches to measure views on ageing should be extended to more specifically target the implicit level as well as affective, physiological, and behavioural manifestations. Additionally, means for capturing views on ageing on the societal level and tools with a distinct time reference are needed. This is particularly important when one wants to account for the lifelong dynamics of views on ageing. Springer Netherlands 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7752934/ /pubmed/33376461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Klusmann, Verena
Notthoff, Nanna
Beyer, Ann-Kristin
Blawert, Anne
Gabrian, Martina
The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title_full The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title_fullStr The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title_full_unstemmed The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title_short The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
title_sort assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00556-9
work_keys_str_mv AT klusmannverena theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT notthoffnanna theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT beyerannkristin theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT blawertanne theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT gabrianmartina theassessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT klusmannverena assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT notthoffnanna assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT beyerannkristin assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT blawertanne assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions
AT gabrianmartina assessmentofviewsonageingareviewofselfreportmeasuresandinnovativeextensions