Cargando…
Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission
OBJECTIVES: To assess the risks associated with relaxing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐related physical distancing restrictions and lockdown policies during a period of low viral transmission. DESIGN: Network‐based viral transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207390 http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50845 |
_version_ | 1783626061603405824 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Nick Palmer, Anna Delport, Dominic Abeysuriya, Romesh Stuart, Robyn M Kerr, Cliff C Mistry, Dina Klein, Daniel J Sacks‐Davis, Rachel Heath, Katie Hainsworth, Samuel W Pedrana, Alisa Stoove, Mark Wilson, David Hellard, Margaret E |
author_facet | Scott, Nick Palmer, Anna Delport, Dominic Abeysuriya, Romesh Stuart, Robyn M Kerr, Cliff C Mistry, Dina Klein, Daniel J Sacks‐Davis, Rachel Heath, Katie Hainsworth, Samuel W Pedrana, Alisa Stoove, Mark Wilson, David Hellard, Margaret E |
author_sort | Scott, Nick |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the risks associated with relaxing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐related physical distancing restrictions and lockdown policies during a period of low viral transmission. DESIGN: Network‐based viral transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces and activities were simulated in an agent‐based model, Covasim. SETTING: The model was calibrated for a baseline scenario reflecting the epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria during March–May 2020, a period of low community viral transmission. INTERVENTION: Policy changes for easing COVID‐19‐related restrictions from May 2020 were simulated in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including with a smartphone app), and quarantine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Increase in detected COVID‐19 cases following relaxation of restrictions. RESULTS: Policy changes that facilitate contact of individuals with large numbers of unknown people (eg, opening bars, increased public transport use) were associated with the greatest risk of COVID‐19 case numbers increasing; changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known contacts (eg, small social gatherings, opening schools) were associated with lower risks. In our model, the rise in case numbers following some policy changes was notable only two months after their implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Removing several COVID‐19‐related restrictions within a short period of time should be undertaken with care, as the consequences may not be apparent for more than two months. Our findings support continuation of work from home policies (to reduce public transport use) and strategies that mitigate the risk associated with re‐opening of social venues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7753668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77536682020-12-22 Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission Scott, Nick Palmer, Anna Delport, Dominic Abeysuriya, Romesh Stuart, Robyn M Kerr, Cliff C Mistry, Dina Klein, Daniel J Sacks‐Davis, Rachel Heath, Katie Hainsworth, Samuel W Pedrana, Alisa Stoove, Mark Wilson, David Hellard, Margaret E Med J Aust Research and Reviews OBJECTIVES: To assess the risks associated with relaxing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐related physical distancing restrictions and lockdown policies during a period of low viral transmission. DESIGN: Network‐based viral transmission risks in households, schools, workplaces, and a variety of community spaces and activities were simulated in an agent‐based model, Covasim. SETTING: The model was calibrated for a baseline scenario reflecting the epidemiological and policy environment in Victoria during March–May 2020, a period of low community viral transmission. INTERVENTION: Policy changes for easing COVID‐19‐related restrictions from May 2020 were simulated in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including with a smartphone app), and quarantine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Increase in detected COVID‐19 cases following relaxation of restrictions. RESULTS: Policy changes that facilitate contact of individuals with large numbers of unknown people (eg, opening bars, increased public transport use) were associated with the greatest risk of COVID‐19 case numbers increasing; changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known contacts (eg, small social gatherings, opening schools) were associated with lower risks. In our model, the rise in case numbers following some policy changes was notable only two months after their implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Removing several COVID‐19‐related restrictions within a short period of time should be undertaken with care, as the consequences may not be apparent for more than two months. Our findings support continuation of work from home policies (to reduce public transport use) and strategies that mitigate the risk associated with re‐opening of social venues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-18 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7753668/ /pubmed/33207390 http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50845 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Medical Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AMPCo Pty Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research and Reviews Scott, Nick Palmer, Anna Delport, Dominic Abeysuriya, Romesh Stuart, Robyn M Kerr, Cliff C Mistry, Dina Klein, Daniel J Sacks‐Davis, Rachel Heath, Katie Hainsworth, Samuel W Pedrana, Alisa Stoove, Mark Wilson, David Hellard, Margaret E Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title | Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title_full | Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title_fullStr | Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title_short | Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
title_sort | modelling the impact of relaxing covid‐19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission |
topic | Research and Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33207390 http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottnick modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT palmeranna modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT delportdominic modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT abeysuriyaromesh modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT stuartrobynm modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT kerrcliffc modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT mistrydina modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT kleindanielj modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT sacksdavisrachel modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT heathkatie modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT hainsworthsamuelw modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT pedranaalisa modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT stoovemark modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT wilsondavid modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission AT hellardmargarete modellingtheimpactofrelaxingcovid19controlmeasuresduringaperiodoflowviraltransmission |