Cargando…
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines
Stroke prevention is one of the cornerstones of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As part of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway (A: Avoid stroke/Anticoagulation; B: Better symptom control; C: Cardiovascular risk and comorbidity optimisation), stroke risk assessment...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa180 |
_version_ | 1783626066067193856 |
---|---|
author | Chao, Tze-Fan Nedeljkovic, Milan A Lip, Gregory Y H Potpara, Tatjana S |
author_facet | Chao, Tze-Fan Nedeljkovic, Milan A Lip, Gregory Y H Potpara, Tatjana S |
author_sort | Chao, Tze-Fan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stroke prevention is one of the cornerstones of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As part of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway (A: Avoid stroke/Anticoagulation; B: Better symptom control; C: Cardiovascular risk and comorbidity optimisation), stroke risk assessment and appropriate thromboprophylaxis is emphasised. Various guidelines have addressed stroke prevention. In this review, we compared the 2017 APHRS, 2018 ACCP, 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS, and 2020 ESC AF guidelines regarding the stroke/bleeding risk assessment and recommendations about the use of OAC. We also aimed to highlight some unique points for each of those guidelines. All four guidelines recommend the use of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score for stroke risk assessment, and OAC (preferably NOACs in all NOAC-eligible patients) is recommended for AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (males) or ≥3 (females). Guidelines also emphasize the importance of stroke risk reassessments at periodic intervals (e.g. 4–6 months) to inform treatment decisions (e.g. initiation of OAC in patients no longer at low risk of stroke) and address potentially modifiable bleeding risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7753747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77537472020-12-29 Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines Chao, Tze-Fan Nedeljkovic, Milan A Lip, Gregory Y H Potpara, Tatjana S Eur Heart J Suppl Articles Stroke prevention is one of the cornerstones of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As part of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway (A: Avoid stroke/Anticoagulation; B: Better symptom control; C: Cardiovascular risk and comorbidity optimisation), stroke risk assessment and appropriate thromboprophylaxis is emphasised. Various guidelines have addressed stroke prevention. In this review, we compared the 2017 APHRS, 2018 ACCP, 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS, and 2020 ESC AF guidelines regarding the stroke/bleeding risk assessment and recommendations about the use of OAC. We also aimed to highlight some unique points for each of those guidelines. All four guidelines recommend the use of the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score for stroke risk assessment, and OAC (preferably NOACs in all NOAC-eligible patients) is recommended for AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (males) or ≥3 (females). Guidelines also emphasize the importance of stroke risk reassessments at periodic intervals (e.g. 4–6 months) to inform treatment decisions (e.g. initiation of OAC in patients no longer at low risk of stroke) and address potentially modifiable bleeding risk factors. Oxford University Press 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7753747/ /pubmed/33380944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa180 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles Chao, Tze-Fan Nedeljkovic, Milan A Lip, Gregory Y H Potpara, Tatjana S Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title | Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title_full | Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title_fullStr | Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title_short | Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
title_sort | stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suaa180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaotzefan strokepreventioninatrialfibrillationcomparisonofrecentinternationalguidelines AT nedeljkovicmilana strokepreventioninatrialfibrillationcomparisonofrecentinternationalguidelines AT lipgregoryyh strokepreventioninatrialfibrillationcomparisonofrecentinternationalguidelines AT potparatatjanas strokepreventioninatrialfibrillationcomparisonofrecentinternationalguidelines |