Cargando…

Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?

AIM: The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the risks, both direct and indirect, to the foetus from the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Direct and indirect risks were defined as (a) vertical infection (congenital or intrapartum), (b) maternal infection and its sequelae, and (c) sources of mate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iqbal, Aysha, Burrin, Charlotte, Aydin, Ezra, Beardsall, Kathryn, Wong, Hilary, Austin, Topun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15693
_version_ 1783626070550904832
author Iqbal, Aysha
Burrin, Charlotte
Aydin, Ezra
Beardsall, Kathryn
Wong, Hilary
Austin, Topun
author_facet Iqbal, Aysha
Burrin, Charlotte
Aydin, Ezra
Beardsall, Kathryn
Wong, Hilary
Austin, Topun
author_sort Iqbal, Aysha
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the risks, both direct and indirect, to the foetus from the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Direct and indirect risks were defined as (a) vertical infection (congenital or intrapartum), (b) maternal infection and its sequelae, and (c) sources of maternal stress during lockdown, including social isolation and altered healthcare provision. RESULTS: Early studies suggest that vertical viral transmission is low; however, there may be an important effect of maternal infection on foetal growth and development. The impact of various degrees of lockdown on prospective mothers’ health, habits and healthcare provision is of concern. In particular, increased maternal stress has been shown to have a significant effect on foetal brain development increasing the risk of mental health, and cognitive and behavioural disorders in later life. CONCLUSION: From the evidence available to date, direct risks to the foetus from the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus are low. Indirect effects of the pandemic, particularly resulting from the effect of maternal stress on the developing brain, can have lifelong detrimental impacts for this generation of children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7753784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77537842020-12-22 Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried? Iqbal, Aysha Burrin, Charlotte Aydin, Ezra Beardsall, Kathryn Wong, Hilary Austin, Topun Acta Paediatr Review Articles AIM: The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the risks, both direct and indirect, to the foetus from the COVID‐19 pandemic. METHODS: Direct and indirect risks were defined as (a) vertical infection (congenital or intrapartum), (b) maternal infection and its sequelae, and (c) sources of maternal stress during lockdown, including social isolation and altered healthcare provision. RESULTS: Early studies suggest that vertical viral transmission is low; however, there may be an important effect of maternal infection on foetal growth and development. The impact of various degrees of lockdown on prospective mothers’ health, habits and healthcare provision is of concern. In particular, increased maternal stress has been shown to have a significant effect on foetal brain development increasing the risk of mental health, and cognitive and behavioural disorders in later life. CONCLUSION: From the evidence available to date, direct risks to the foetus from the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus are low. Indirect effects of the pandemic, particularly resulting from the effect of maternal stress on the developing brain, can have lifelong detrimental impacts for this generation of children. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-10 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7753784/ /pubmed/33253455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15693 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley © Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Iqbal, Aysha
Burrin, Charlotte
Aydin, Ezra
Beardsall, Kathryn
Wong, Hilary
Austin, Topun
Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title_full Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title_fullStr Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title_full_unstemmed Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title_short Generation COVID‐19 – Should the foetus be worried?
title_sort generation covid‐19 – should the foetus be worried?
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15693
work_keys_str_mv AT iqbalaysha generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried
AT burrincharlotte generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried
AT aydinezra generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried
AT beardsallkathryn generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried
AT wonghilary generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried
AT austintopun generationcovid19shouldthefoetusbeworried