Cargando…

Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TANIDA, KONSTANTIN, HAHN, ANDREAS, FRICKMANN, HAGEN
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akadémiai Kiadó 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33279885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030
_version_ 1783626098330828800
author TANIDA, KONSTANTIN
HAHN, ANDREAS
FRICKMANN, HAGEN
author_facet TANIDA, KONSTANTIN
HAHN, ANDREAS
FRICKMANN, HAGEN
author_sort TANIDA, KONSTANTIN
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. METHODS: Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes (“Ringversuche”) were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen’s kappa were assessed. RESULTS: In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75–100% for strongly positive samples, 20–100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen’s kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1–3 to 1–4 Ct values. CONCLUSION: Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7753976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Akadémiai Kiadó
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77539762021-01-06 Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis TANIDA, KONSTANTIN HAHN, ANDREAS FRICKMANN, HAGEN Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) Original Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. METHODS: Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes (“Ringversuche”) were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen’s kappa were assessed. RESULTS: In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75–100% for strongly positive samples, 20–100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen’s kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1–3 to 1–4 Ct values. CONCLUSION: Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches. Akadémiai Kiadó 2020-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7753976/ /pubmed/33279885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030 Text en © 2020, The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes - if any – are indicated.
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
TANIDA, KONSTANTIN
HAHN, ANDREAS
FRICKMANN, HAGEN
Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title_full Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title_fullStr Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title_short Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
title_sort comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time pcr assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7753976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33279885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030
work_keys_str_mv AT tanidakonstantin comparisonoftwocommercialandoneinhouserealtimepcrassaysforthediagnosisofbacterialgastroenteritis
AT hahnandreas comparisonoftwocommercialandoneinhouserealtimepcrassaysforthediagnosisofbacterialgastroenteritis
AT frickmannhagen comparisonoftwocommercialandoneinhouserealtimepcrassaysforthediagnosisofbacterialgastroenteritis