Cargando…
#IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780 |
_version_ | 1783626138985168896 |
---|---|
author | Graham, Timothy Bruns, Axel Angus, Daniel Hurcombe, Edward Hames, Sam |
author_facet | Graham, Timothy Bruns, Axel Angus, Daniel Hurcombe, Edward Hames, Sam |
author_sort | Graham, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative content analysis, network analysis, computational sentiment analysis and social bot detection, we reveal how a small number of hyper-partisan pro- and anti-government campaigners were able to mobilise ad hoc communities on Twitter, and – in the case of the anti-government hashtag campaign – co-opt journalists and politicians through a multi-step flow process to amplify their message. Our comprehensive analysis of Twitter data from these campaigns offers insights into the evolution of political hashtag campaigns, how actors involved in these specific campaigns were able to exploit specific dynamics of Twitter and the broader media and political establishment to progress their hyper-partisan agendas, and the utility of mixed-method approaches in helping render the dynamics of such campaigns visible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7754160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77541602020-12-22 #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions Graham, Timothy Bruns, Axel Angus, Daniel Hurcombe, Edward Hames, Sam Media International Australia Articles In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative content analysis, network analysis, computational sentiment analysis and social bot detection, we reveal how a small number of hyper-partisan pro- and anti-government campaigners were able to mobilise ad hoc communities on Twitter, and – in the case of the anti-government hashtag campaign – co-opt journalists and politicians through a multi-step flow process to amplify their message. Our comprehensive analysis of Twitter data from these campaigns offers insights into the evolution of political hashtag campaigns, how actors involved in these specific campaigns were able to exploit specific dynamics of Twitter and the broader media and political establishment to progress their hyper-partisan agendas, and the utility of mixed-method approaches in helping render the dynamics of such campaigns visible. SAGE Publications 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7754160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Graham, Timothy Bruns, Axel Angus, Daniel Hurcombe, Edward Hames, Sam #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title | #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter
discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title_full | #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter
discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title_fullStr | #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter
discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title_full_unstemmed | #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter
discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title_short | #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter
discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions |
title_sort | #istandwithdan versus #dictatordan: the polarised dynamics of twitter
discussions about victoria’s covid-19 restrictions |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahamtimothy istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions AT brunsaxel istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions AT angusdaniel istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions AT hurcombeedward istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions AT hamessam istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions |