Cargando…

#IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions

In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham, Timothy, Bruns, Axel, Angus, Daniel, Hurcombe, Edward, Hames, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754160/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780
_version_ 1783626138985168896
author Graham, Timothy
Bruns, Axel
Angus, Daniel
Hurcombe, Edward
Hames, Sam
author_facet Graham, Timothy
Bruns, Axel
Angus, Daniel
Hurcombe, Edward
Hames, Sam
author_sort Graham, Timothy
collection PubMed
description In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative content analysis, network analysis, computational sentiment analysis and social bot detection, we reveal how a small number of hyper-partisan pro- and anti-government campaigners were able to mobilise ad hoc communities on Twitter, and – in the case of the anti-government hashtag campaign – co-opt journalists and politicians through a multi-step flow process to amplify their message. Our comprehensive analysis of Twitter data from these campaigns offers insights into the evolution of political hashtag campaigns, how actors involved in these specific campaigns were able to exploit specific dynamics of Twitter and the broader media and political establishment to progress their hyper-partisan agendas, and the utility of mixed-method approaches in helping render the dynamics of such campaigns visible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77541602020-12-22 #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions Graham, Timothy Bruns, Axel Angus, Daniel Hurcombe, Edward Hames, Sam Media International Australia Articles In this article, we examine two interrelated hashtag campaigns that formed in response to the Victorian State Government’s handling of Australia’s most significant COVID-19 second wave of mid-to-late 2020. Through a mixed-methods approach that includes descriptive statistical analysis, qualitative content analysis, network analysis, computational sentiment analysis and social bot detection, we reveal how a small number of hyper-partisan pro- and anti-government campaigners were able to mobilise ad hoc communities on Twitter, and – in the case of the anti-government hashtag campaign – co-opt journalists and politicians through a multi-step flow process to amplify their message. Our comprehensive analysis of Twitter data from these campaigns offers insights into the evolution of political hashtag campaigns, how actors involved in these specific campaigns were able to exploit specific dynamics of Twitter and the broader media and political establishment to progress their hyper-partisan agendas, and the utility of mixed-method approaches in helping render the dynamics of such campaigns visible. SAGE Publications 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7754160/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Graham, Timothy
Bruns, Axel
Angus, Daniel
Hurcombe, Edward
Hames, Sam
#IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title_full #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title_fullStr #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title_full_unstemmed #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title_short #IStandWithDan versus #DictatorDan: the polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions
title_sort #istandwithdan versus #dictatordan: the polarised dynamics of twitter discussions about victoria’s covid-19 restrictions
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754160/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20981780
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamtimothy istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions
AT brunsaxel istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions
AT angusdaniel istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions
AT hurcombeedward istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions
AT hamessam istandwithdanversusdictatordanthepolariseddynamicsoftwitterdiscussionsaboutvictoriascovid19restrictions