Cargando…

Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance

PURPOSE: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigmatic outcomes for trifocal toric IOL (TTI) cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining 137 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and TTI implantation using femtosecond laser, digital registration, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blaylock, John F, Hall, Brad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363357
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285711
_version_ 1783626153956737024
author Blaylock, John F
Hall, Brad
author_facet Blaylock, John F
Hall, Brad
author_sort Blaylock, John F
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigmatic outcomes for trifocal toric IOL (TTI) cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining 137 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and TTI implantation using femtosecond laser, digital registration, and IA. Final cylinder power and axis of placement were determined by IA. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and refractive data were collected at 3 months. Postoperative residual astigmatism (PRA) determined by manifest refraction was compared to back-calculated residual astigmatism (BRA) using the cylinder power calculated preoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 97.8% of eyes had IA PRA ≤ 0.50D and 80.3% had BRA ≤ 0.50 D, a difference of 17.5%. Mean PRA for IA was 0.07 D ± 0.19 (range 0.00–1.00 D) compared to BRA 0.31 D ± 0.33 (range 0.00–1.34 D) (P < 0.001). Cylinder power was changed in 50.4% of cases based upon IA. Postoperative mean UDVA (LogMAR) was 0.04 ± 0.09 (range −0.12–0.30 logMAR), and 65% of eyes were ≤ 0.0, 85% ≤ 0.1, and 99% ≤ 0.18. CONCLUSION: The proportion of eyes with PRA ≤ 0.50 D and mean PRA was significantly lower using IA versus the preoperative planned cylinder power.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77542592020-12-23 Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance Blaylock, John F Hall, Brad Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigmatic outcomes for trifocal toric IOL (TTI) cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining 137 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and TTI implantation using femtosecond laser, digital registration, and IA. Final cylinder power and axis of placement were determined by IA. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and refractive data were collected at 3 months. Postoperative residual astigmatism (PRA) determined by manifest refraction was compared to back-calculated residual astigmatism (BRA) using the cylinder power calculated preoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 97.8% of eyes had IA PRA ≤ 0.50D and 80.3% had BRA ≤ 0.50 D, a difference of 17.5%. Mean PRA for IA was 0.07 D ± 0.19 (range 0.00–1.00 D) compared to BRA 0.31 D ± 0.33 (range 0.00–1.34 D) (P < 0.001). Cylinder power was changed in 50.4% of cases based upon IA. Postoperative mean UDVA (LogMAR) was 0.04 ± 0.09 (range −0.12–0.30 logMAR), and 65% of eyes were ≤ 0.0, 85% ≤ 0.1, and 99% ≤ 0.18. CONCLUSION: The proportion of eyes with PRA ≤ 0.50 D and mean PRA was significantly lower using IA versus the preoperative planned cylinder power. Dove 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7754259/ /pubmed/33363357 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285711 Text en © 2020 Blaylock and Hall. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Blaylock, John F
Hall, Brad
Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_full Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_fullStr Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_full_unstemmed Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_short Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_sort astigmatic results of a diffractive trifocal toric iol following intraoperative aberrometry guidance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33363357
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S285711
work_keys_str_mv AT blaylockjohnf astigmaticresultsofadiffractivetrifocaltoriciolfollowingintraoperativeaberrometryguidance
AT hallbrad astigmaticresultsofadiffractivetrifocaltoriciolfollowingintraoperativeaberrometryguidance