Cargando…

Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder consistently show a male bias in prevalence, but it remains unclear why males and females are affected with different frequency. While many behavioral studies of transgenic NDD models have focused only o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mossa, Adele, Manzini, M. Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24577
_version_ 1783626169455738880
author Mossa, Adele
Manzini, M. Chiara
author_facet Mossa, Adele
Manzini, M. Chiara
author_sort Mossa, Adele
collection PubMed
description Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder consistently show a male bias in prevalence, but it remains unclear why males and females are affected with different frequency. While many behavioral studies of transgenic NDD models have focused only on males, the requirement by the National Institutes of Health to consider sex as a biological variable has promoted the comparison of male and female performance in wild‐type and mutant animals. Here, we review examples of rodent models of NDDs in which sex‐specific deficits were identified in molecular, physiological, and/or behavioral responses, showing sex differences in susceptibility to disruption of genes mutated in NDDs. Haploinsufficiency in genes involved in mechanisms such as synaptic function (GABRB3 and NRXN1), chromatin remodeling (CHD8, EMHT1, and ADNP), and intracellular signaling (CC2D1A and ERK1) lead to more severe behavioral outcomes in males. However, in the absence of behavioral deficits, females can still present with cellular and electrophysiological changes that could be due to compensatory mechanisms or differential allocation of molecular and cellular functions in the two sexes. By contrasting these findings with mouse models where females are more severely affected (MTHFR and AMBRA1), we propose a framework to approach the study of sex‐specific deficits possibly leading to sex bias in NDDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77543272020-12-23 Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders Mossa, Adele Manzini, M. Chiara J Neurosci Res Neurodevelopment/Early Life Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder consistently show a male bias in prevalence, but it remains unclear why males and females are affected with different frequency. While many behavioral studies of transgenic NDD models have focused only on males, the requirement by the National Institutes of Health to consider sex as a biological variable has promoted the comparison of male and female performance in wild‐type and mutant animals. Here, we review examples of rodent models of NDDs in which sex‐specific deficits were identified in molecular, physiological, and/or behavioral responses, showing sex differences in susceptibility to disruption of genes mutated in NDDs. Haploinsufficiency in genes involved in mechanisms such as synaptic function (GABRB3 and NRXN1), chromatin remodeling (CHD8, EMHT1, and ADNP), and intracellular signaling (CC2D1A and ERK1) lead to more severe behavioral outcomes in males. However, in the absence of behavioral deficits, females can still present with cellular and electrophysiological changes that could be due to compensatory mechanisms or differential allocation of molecular and cellular functions in the two sexes. By contrasting these findings with mouse models where females are more severely affected (MTHFR and AMBRA1), we propose a framework to approach the study of sex‐specific deficits possibly leading to sex bias in NDDs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7754327/ /pubmed/31872500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24577 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Neuroscience Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Neurodevelopment/Early Life
Mossa, Adele
Manzini, M. Chiara
Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title_full Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title_fullStr Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title_full_unstemmed Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title_short Molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
title_sort molecular causes of sex‐specific deficits in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders
topic Neurodevelopment/Early Life
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24577
work_keys_str_mv AT mossaadele molecularcausesofsexspecificdeficitsinrodentmodelsofneurodevelopmentaldisorders
AT manzinimchiara molecularcausesofsexspecificdeficitsinrodentmodelsofneurodevelopmentaldisorders