Cargando…

Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE: To determine whether range of motion (ROM) varies with the location and extent of labral tear seen in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization who were enrolled in the Multicenter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houck, Darby A., Dunn, Robin H., Hettrich, Carolyn M., Wolf, Brian R., Frank, Rachel M., McCarty, Eric C., Bravman, Jonathan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.014
_version_ 1783626215737786368
author Houck, Darby A.
Dunn, Robin H.
Hettrich, Carolyn M.
Wolf, Brian R.
Frank, Rachel M.
McCarty, Eric C.
Bravman, Jonathan T.
author_facet Houck, Darby A.
Dunn, Robin H.
Hettrich, Carolyn M.
Wolf, Brian R.
Frank, Rachel M.
McCarty, Eric C.
Bravman, Jonathan T.
author_sort Houck, Darby A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether range of motion (ROM) varies with the location and extent of labral tear seen in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization who were enrolled in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Shoulder Instability database underwent a preoperative physical examination and intraoperative examination under anesthesia in which ROM was recorded. Intraoperatively, the location and extent of the labral tear was recorded using conventional clock-face coordinates. Patients were grouped by combinations of quadrants involved in the labral tear (G1-G7): G1 = anterior only, G2 = anterior + inferior, G3 = anterior + inferior + posterior, G4 = all quadrants, G5 = superior + anterior, G6 = superior + anterior + inferior, and G7 = posterior + superior + anterior. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test. When P < .05, a post-hoc Dunn’s test was performed. For categorical variables, the χ(2) test was performed. We performed a series of bivariate negative binomial regression models testing pairwise combinations of ROM parameters predicting the count of labral tear locations (possible: 0-5) within each quadrant. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, with 13 (2.8%) in G1, 221 (47.3%) in G2, 40 (8.6%) in G3, 51 (10.9%) in G4, 18 (3.9%) in G5, 121 (25.9%) in G6, and 3 (0.6%) in G7. Multiple statistically significant differences were noted in ROM, specifically active internal rotation at side (IRS) (P = .005), active abduction (P = .02), passive IRS (P = .02), and passive external rotation in abduction (P = .0007). Regression modeling revealed a positive correlation between passive abduction and predicted count of labral tear locations in the superior quadrant and between passive IRS and predicted count of labral tear location in the inferior quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for anterior instability, ROM varies with location and extent of labral tear. However, the clinical relevance of such small ROM differences remains undetermined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective comparative study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77545262020-12-23 Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability Houck, Darby A. Dunn, Robin H. Hettrich, Carolyn M. Wolf, Brian R. Frank, Rachel M. McCarty, Eric C. Bravman, Jonathan T. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether range of motion (ROM) varies with the location and extent of labral tear seen in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization who were enrolled in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Shoulder Instability database underwent a preoperative physical examination and intraoperative examination under anesthesia in which ROM was recorded. Intraoperatively, the location and extent of the labral tear was recorded using conventional clock-face coordinates. Patients were grouped by combinations of quadrants involved in the labral tear (G1-G7): G1 = anterior only, G2 = anterior + inferior, G3 = anterior + inferior + posterior, G4 = all quadrants, G5 = superior + anterior, G6 = superior + anterior + inferior, and G7 = posterior + superior + anterior. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test. When P < .05, a post-hoc Dunn’s test was performed. For categorical variables, the χ(2) test was performed. We performed a series of bivariate negative binomial regression models testing pairwise combinations of ROM parameters predicting the count of labral tear locations (possible: 0-5) within each quadrant. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included, with 13 (2.8%) in G1, 221 (47.3%) in G2, 40 (8.6%) in G3, 51 (10.9%) in G4, 18 (3.9%) in G5, 121 (25.9%) in G6, and 3 (0.6%) in G7. Multiple statistically significant differences were noted in ROM, specifically active internal rotation at side (IRS) (P = .005), active abduction (P = .02), passive IRS (P = .02), and passive external rotation in abduction (P = .0007). Regression modeling revealed a positive correlation between passive abduction and predicted count of labral tear locations in the superior quadrant and between passive IRS and predicted count of labral tear location in the inferior quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for anterior instability, ROM varies with location and extent of labral tear. However, the clinical relevance of such small ROM differences remains undetermined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective comparative study. Elsevier 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7754526/ /pubmed/33364609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.014 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Houck, Darby A.
Dunn, Robin H.
Hettrich, Carolyn M.
Wolf, Brian R.
Frank, Rachel M.
McCarty, Eric C.
Bravman, Jonathan T.
Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title_full Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title_fullStr Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title_short Estimation of Location and Extent of Labral Tear Based on Preoperative Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability
title_sort estimation of location and extent of labral tear based on preoperative range of motion in patients undergoing arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33364609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.014
work_keys_str_mv AT houckdarbya estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT dunnrobinh estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT hettrichcarolynm estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT wolfbrianr estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT frankrachelm estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT mccartyericc estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability
AT bravmanjonathant estimationoflocationandextentoflabraltearbasedonpreoperativerangeofmotioninpatientsundergoingarthroscopicstabilizationforanteriorshoulderinstability