Cargando…

Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) involves complex remodelling leading to electrical and mechanical dysfunction. We hypothesized that machine learning approaches incorporating data obtained from different investigative modalities including atrial and ventricular measurements from electrocardiography and echo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Gary, Zhou, Jiandong, Woo, Samuel Won Dong, Ko, Ching Ho, Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen, Liu, Tong, Liu, Yingzhi, Leung, Keith Sai Kit, Li, Andrew, Lee, Sharen, Li, Ka Hou Christien, Lakhani, Ishan, Zhang, Qingpeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12929
_version_ 1783626253504348160
author Tse, Gary
Zhou, Jiandong
Woo, Samuel Won Dong
Ko, Ching Ho
Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen
Liu, Tong
Liu, Yingzhi
Leung, Keith Sai Kit
Li, Andrew
Lee, Sharen
Li, Ka Hou Christien
Lakhani, Ishan
Zhang, Qingpeng
author_facet Tse, Gary
Zhou, Jiandong
Woo, Samuel Won Dong
Ko, Ching Ho
Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen
Liu, Tong
Liu, Yingzhi
Leung, Keith Sai Kit
Li, Andrew
Lee, Sharen
Li, Ka Hou Christien
Lakhani, Ishan
Zhang, Qingpeng
author_sort Tse, Gary
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Heart failure (HF) involves complex remodelling leading to electrical and mechanical dysfunction. We hypothesized that machine learning approaches incorporating data obtained from different investigative modalities including atrial and ventricular measurements from electrocardiography and echocardiography, blood inflammatory marker [neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) will improve risk stratification for adverse outcomes in HF compared to logistic regression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive Chinese patients referred to our centre for transthoracic echocardiography and subsequently diagnosed with HF, between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, were included in this study. Two machine learning techniques, multilayer perceptron and multi‐task learning, were compared with logistic regression for their ability to predict incident atrial fibrillation (AF), transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke, and all‐cause mortality. This study included 312 HF patients [mean age: 64 (55–73) years, 75% male]. There were 76 cases of new‐onset AF, 62 cases of incident TIA/stroke, and 117 deaths during follow‐up. Univariate analysis revealed that age, left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) and contractile strain (LACS) were significant predictors of new‐onset AF. Age and smoking predicted incident stroke. Age, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, mitral or aortic regurgitation, P‐wave terminal force in V1, the presence of partial inter‐atrial block, left atrial diameter, ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, serum creatinine and albumin, high NLR, low PNI, and LARS and LACS predicted all‐cause mortality. Machine learning techniques achieved better prediction performance than logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Multi‐modality assessment is important for risk stratification in HF. A machine learning approach provides additional value for improving outcome prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77547442020-12-23 Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% Tse, Gary Zhou, Jiandong Woo, Samuel Won Dong Ko, Ching Ho Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen Liu, Tong Liu, Yingzhi Leung, Keith Sai Kit Li, Andrew Lee, Sharen Li, Ka Hou Christien Lakhani, Ishan Zhang, Qingpeng ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Heart failure (HF) involves complex remodelling leading to electrical and mechanical dysfunction. We hypothesized that machine learning approaches incorporating data obtained from different investigative modalities including atrial and ventricular measurements from electrocardiography and echocardiography, blood inflammatory marker [neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR)], and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) will improve risk stratification for adverse outcomes in HF compared to logistic regression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive Chinese patients referred to our centre for transthoracic echocardiography and subsequently diagnosed with HF, between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, were included in this study. Two machine learning techniques, multilayer perceptron and multi‐task learning, were compared with logistic regression for their ability to predict incident atrial fibrillation (AF), transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke, and all‐cause mortality. This study included 312 HF patients [mean age: 64 (55–73) years, 75% male]. There were 76 cases of new‐onset AF, 62 cases of incident TIA/stroke, and 117 deaths during follow‐up. Univariate analysis revealed that age, left atrial reservoir strain (LARS) and contractile strain (LACS) were significant predictors of new‐onset AF. Age and smoking predicted incident stroke. Age, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, mitral or aortic regurgitation, P‐wave terminal force in V1, the presence of partial inter‐atrial block, left atrial diameter, ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, serum creatinine and albumin, high NLR, low PNI, and LARS and LACS predicted all‐cause mortality. Machine learning techniques achieved better prediction performance than logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Multi‐modality assessment is important for risk stratification in HF. A machine learning approach provides additional value for improving outcome prediction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7754744/ /pubmed/33094925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12929 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Tse, Gary
Zhou, Jiandong
Woo, Samuel Won Dong
Ko, Ching Ho
Lai, Rachel Wing Chuen
Liu, Tong
Liu, Yingzhi
Leung, Keith Sai Kit
Li, Andrew
Lee, Sharen
Li, Ka Hou Christien
Lakhani, Ishan
Zhang, Qingpeng
Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title_full Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title_fullStr Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title_full_unstemmed Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title_short Multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
title_sort multi‐modality machine learning approach for risk stratification in heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12929
work_keys_str_mv AT tsegary multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT zhoujiandong multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT woosamuelwondong multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT kochingho multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT lairachelwingchuen multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT liutong multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT liuyingzhi multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT leungkeithsaikit multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT liandrew multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT leesharen multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT likahouchristien multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT lakhaniishan multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45
AT zhangqingpeng multimodalitymachinelearningapproachforriskstratificationinheartfailurewithleftventricularejectionfraction45