Cargando…

Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function

AIMS: Increasing attention is being given to patients with heart failure and ‘mid‐range’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥40% and <50%) for whom there are no approved therapies that improve prognosis. We aim to assess for the first time the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tschöpe, Carsten, Butler, Javed, Farmakis, Dimitrios, Morley, Deborah, Rao, Ishu, Filippatos, Gerasimos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13126
_version_ 1783626254216331264
author Tschöpe, Carsten
Butler, Javed
Farmakis, Dimitrios
Morley, Deborah
Rao, Ishu
Filippatos, Gerasimos
author_facet Tschöpe, Carsten
Butler, Javed
Farmakis, Dimitrios
Morley, Deborah
Rao, Ishu
Filippatos, Gerasimos
author_sort Tschöpe, Carsten
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Increasing attention is being given to patients with heart failure and ‘mid‐range’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥40% and <50%) for whom there are no approved therapies that improve prognosis. We aim to assess for the first time the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the effects of 6‐  month CCM therapy on functional status, exercise tolerance and quality of life in a subgroup of 53 patients with a LVEF of 40–45% recruited in previous CCM studies, including 37 patients in the CCM group and 16 in the control group. New York Heart Association classification improved by ≥1 class from baseline to 24 weeks in 80.6% (95% confidence interval [62.5%, 92.5%]) of patients in the CCM group compared with 57.1% in the control group (95% confidence interval [28.9%, 82.3%], P = 0.15). Six‐minute walk distance increased significantly in the CCM group with a net between‐group treatment effect of 53.9 ± 74.2 m (P = 0.05). Peak VO(2) improved in the CCM group with a net between‐group treatment effect of 2.0 ± 2.8 mL/kg/min (P = 0.02). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score decreased from baseline to 24 weeks with a net between‐group treatment effect of −13.1 ± 21.0 (P = 0.10). There were no significant differences in the adverse event rate between the CCM and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that CCM exerts favourable effects on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with LVEF in the range of 40–45% with an acceptable safety profile. Further randomized controlled studies are planned to prove these effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7754749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77547492020-12-23 Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function Tschöpe, Carsten Butler, Javed Farmakis, Dimitrios Morley, Deborah Rao, Ishu Filippatos, Gerasimos ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Increasing attention is being given to patients with heart failure and ‘mid‐range’ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, ≥40% and <50%) for whom there are no approved therapies that improve prognosis. We aim to assess for the first time the effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the effects of 6‐  month CCM therapy on functional status, exercise tolerance and quality of life in a subgroup of 53 patients with a LVEF of 40–45% recruited in previous CCM studies, including 37 patients in the CCM group and 16 in the control group. New York Heart Association classification improved by ≥1 class from baseline to 24 weeks in 80.6% (95% confidence interval [62.5%, 92.5%]) of patients in the CCM group compared with 57.1% in the control group (95% confidence interval [28.9%, 82.3%], P = 0.15). Six‐minute walk distance increased significantly in the CCM group with a net between‐group treatment effect of 53.9 ± 74.2 m (P = 0.05). Peak VO(2) improved in the CCM group with a net between‐group treatment effect of 2.0 ± 2.8 mL/kg/min (P = 0.02). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score decreased from baseline to 24 weeks with a net between‐group treatment effect of −13.1 ± 21.0 (P = 0.10). There were no significant differences in the adverse event rate between the CCM and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that CCM exerts favourable effects on exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with LVEF in the range of 40–45% with an acceptable safety profile. Further randomized controlled studies are planned to prove these effects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7754749/ /pubmed/33274601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13126 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Tschöpe, Carsten
Butler, Javed
Farmakis, Dimitrios
Morley, Deborah
Rao, Ishu
Filippatos, Gerasimos
Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title_full Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title_fullStr Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title_short Clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
title_sort clinical effects of cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with mildly reduced systolic function
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7754749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13126
work_keys_str_mv AT tschopecarsten clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction
AT butlerjaved clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction
AT farmakisdimitrios clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction
AT morleydeborah clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction
AT raoishu clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction
AT filippatosgerasimos clinicaleffectsofcardiaccontractilitymodulationinheartfailurewithmildlyreducedsystolicfunction